The Impact of Radiological Assessment Schedules on Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 102293
Author(s):  
Dor Reuven Dabush ◽  
Daniel Shepshelovich ◽  
Tzippy Shochat ◽  
Ariadna Tibau ◽  
Eitan Amir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Radiological Assessment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

The impact of radiological assessment schedules on progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1086-1086
Author(s):  
Dor Reuven Dabush ◽  
Daniel Shepshelovich ◽  
Tzippy Shochat ◽  
Eitan Amir ◽  
Ariadna Tibau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Radiological Assessment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

1086 Background: The impact of the interval of radiological assessment on the magnitude of benefit observed in randomized trials (RCTs) in metastatic breast cancer is undefined. Methods: All RCTs investigating anti-neoplastic drugs for metastatic breast cancer published between 2006 and 2019 were identified. Intervals for restaging were categorized as short ( < 9 weeks) or long (≥9 weeks). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS) were pooled in a meta-analysis and compared between trials employing short and long restaging intervals assessed as subgroup analyses. Analyses were repeated for pre-specified subgroups according to disease subtype, drug type, whether experimental therapy was added to or replaced standard treatment and whether HR for PFS was < 1 or ≥1. Results: Eighty-nine studies comprising 95 comparisons and 44,901 patients were included. The magnitude of PFS benefit was non-significantly larger in trials which employed short compared to long restaging intervals (HR 0.79 vs. 0.86, p = 0.15). Short restaging interval was associated with significantly higher magnitude of effect on PFS in pre-specified subgroups including non-first line studies (HR 0.78 vs. 0.92, p = 0.04), studies with drugs replacing standard treatment (HR 0.86 vs. 1.04, p = 0.02) and studies performed exclusively in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive disease (HR 0.72 vs. 0.90, p = 0.02). Restaging interval was not associated with OS for all included studies (HR 0.92 vs. 0.93, p = 0.66) or for any of the pre-specified subgroups. Conclusions: Shorter restaging intervals are associated with a higher magnitude of effect of PFS, but not OS. Awareness of the impact of the restaging interval on quantification of intermediate endpoints such as PFS is important for the design and interpretation of RCTs.

scholarly journals Network meta-analysis of eribulin versus other chemotherapies used as second- or later-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Zhao ◽  
Rachel Hughes ◽  
Binod Neupane ◽  
Kristin Mickle ◽  
Yun Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Eribulin mesylate (ERI; Halaven®) is a microtubule inhibitor approved in the United States for metastatic breast cancer patients with at least two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer, and in the European Union in locally advanced breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer patients who progressed after at least one chemotherapy for advanced disease. This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of ERI versus other chemotherapies in this setting. Methods Systematic searches conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials identified randomized controlled trials of locally advanced breast cancer/metastatic breast cancer chemotherapies in second- or later-line settings. Efficacy assessment included pre-specified subgroup analysis of breast cancer subtypes. Included studies were assessed for quality using the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis estimated primary outcomes of overall survival and progression-free survival using fixed-effect models. Comparators included: capecitabine (CAP), gemcitabine (GEM), ixabepilone (IXA), utidelone (UTI), treatment by physician’s choice (TPC), and vinorelbine (VIN). Results The network meta-analysis included seven trials. Results showed that second- or later-line patients treated with ERI had statistically longer overall survival versus TPC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81; credible interval [CrI]: 0.66–0.99) or GEM+VIN (0.62; 0.42–0.90) and statistically longer progression-free survival versus TPC (0.76; 0.64–0.90), but statistically shorter progression-free survival versus CAP+IXA (1.40; 1.17–1.67) and CAP+UTI (1.61; 1.23–2.12). In triple negative breast cancer, ERI had statistically longer overall survival versus CAP (0.70; 0.54–0.90); no statistical differences in progression-free survival were observed in triple negative breast cancer. Conclusions This network meta-analysis suggests that ERI may provide an overall survival benefit in the overall locally advanced breast cancer/metastatic breast cancer populations and triple negative breast cancer subgroup compared to standard treatments. These findings support the use of ERI in second- or later-line treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer/metastatic breast cancer.

scholarly journals Deep exploration of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer: monotherapy and combination therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052199101
Author(s):  
Zheling Chen ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Xiao Li ◽  
Yucheng Zhou ◽  
Ke Chen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Free Survival

Objective Nearly 5% of patients with breast cancer carry germline BRCA mutations, which are more common in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous clinical trials demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) against BRCA-mutated metastatic breast cancer. The current study conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficiency and safety of PARPis, either alone or combined with chemotherapy, in patients with TNBC. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials comparing PARPi therapy with chemotherapy, and comparisons of chemotherapy plus PARPis with chemotherapy alone were included. The study endpoints included the clinical response, progression-free survival, and adverse event rates. Results PARPi therapy was revealed to improve progression-free survival in patients with advanced breast cancer, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis illustrated that patients with mutant BRCA1 and mutant BRCA2 and those who had not been treated with platinum-based agents could specifically benefit from PARPis. Conclusion PARPi monotherapy can significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer, especially those with TNBC, those who had not previously received platinum therapy, and those with mutant BRCA1/2. PARPis combined with chemotherapy represent new treatment options for patients with advanced cancer.

scholarly journals Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival of CDK 4/6 Inhibitors Plus Endocrine Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 6400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Piezzo ◽  
Paolo Chiodini ◽  
Maria Riemma ◽  
Stefania Cocco ◽  
Roberta Caputo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Sites

The introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) represents the most relevant advance in the management of hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer over the last few years. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is aimed to better characterize the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in some relevant subgroups and to test heterogeneity between different compounds with a particular focus on their ability to improve overall survival (OS). Pooled estimates of hazard ratios (HRs) were computed for progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and objective response rate (ORR) analysis in predefined subgroups to better understand treatment effect concerning specific patients’ characteristics. To estimate the absolute benefit in terms of PFS, pooled survival curves were generated by pooling the data of all trials. A total of eight RCTs were included. Adding a CDK4/6 inhibitor to ET is beneficial in terms of PFS, irrespective of the presence or not of visceral metastases, the number of metastatic sites, and the length of the treatment-free interval (TFI). The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors produces a significant OS improvement, both in aromatase inhibitor (AI)-sensitive (HR 0.75, 95% CI) and AI-resistant patients (HR 0.77, 95% CI [0.67–0.89]). Pooled data from each single drug show that palbociclib remains the only class member not showing a statistically significant HR for OS (HR 0.83, 95% CI [0.68–1.02]).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document