Semantically Congruent Bimodal Presentation with Divided-Modality Attention Accelerates Unisensory Working Memory Retrieval

Perception ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 917-932
Author(s):  
Hongtao Yu* ◽  
Aijun Wang* ◽  
Qingqing Li ◽  
Yulong Liu ◽  
Jiajia Yang ◽  
...  

Although previous studies have shown that semantic multisensory integration can be differentially modulated by attention focus, it remains unclear whether attentionally mediated multisensory perceptual facilitation could impact further cognitive performance. Using a delayed matching-to-sample paradigm, the present study investigated the effect of semantically congruent bimodal presentation on subsequent unisensory working memory (WM) performance by manipulating attention focus. The results showed that unisensory WM retrieval was faster in the semantically congruent condition than in the incongruent multisensory encoding condition. However, such a result was only found in the divided-modality attention condition. This result indicates that a robust multisensory representation was constructed during semantically congruent multisensory encoding with divided-modality attention; this representation then accelerated unisensory WM performance, especially auditory WM retrieval. Additionally, an overall faster unisensory WM retrieval was observed under the modality-specific selective attention condition compared with the divided-modality condition, indicating that the division of attention to address two modalities demanded more central executive resources to encode and integrate crossmodal information and to maintain a constructed multisensory representation, leaving few resources for WM retrieval. Additionally, the present finding may support the amodal view that WM has an amodal central storage component that is used to maintain modal-based attention-optimized multisensory representations.

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Wingenfeld ◽  
M. Driessen ◽  
K. Terfehr ◽  
N. Schlosser ◽  
S. Carvalho Fernando ◽  
...  

BackgroundStress and cortisol administration are known to have impairing effects on memory retrieval in healthy humans. These effects are reported to be altered in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but they have not yet been investigated in borderline personality disorder (BPD).MethodIn a placebo-controlled cross-over study, 71 women with BPD and 40 healthy controls received either placebo or 10 mg of hydrocortisone orally before undertaking a declarative memory retrieval task (word list learning) and an autobiographical memory test (AMT). A working memory test was also applied.ResultsOverall, opposing effects of cortisol on memory were observed when comparing patients with controls. In controls, cortisol had impairing effects on memory retrieval whereas in BPD patients cortisol had enhancing effects on memory retrieval of words, autobiographical memory and working memory. These effects were most pronounced for specificity of autobiographical memory retrieval. Patients with BPD alone and those with co-morbid PTSD showed this effect. We also found that co-morbid MDD influenced the cortisol effects: in this subgroup (BPD + MDD) the effects of cortisol on memory were absent.ConclusionsThe present results demonstrate beneficial effects of acute cortisol elevations on hippocampal-mediated memory processes in BPD. The absence of these effects in patients with co-morbid MDD suggests that these patients differ from other BPD patients in terms of their sensitivity to glucocorticoids (GCs).


NeuroImage ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 472-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Zhang ◽  
Marieke van Vugt ◽  
Jelmer P. Borst ◽  
John R. Anderson

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Pearson ◽  
J. Raskevicius ◽  
P. M. Bays ◽  
Y. Pertzov ◽  
M. Husain

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nash Unsworth ◽  
Keisuke Fukuda ◽  
Edward Awh ◽  
Edward K. Vogel

1997 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Cabeza ◽  
Lars Nyberg

We review PET studies of higher-order cognitive processes, including attention (sustained and selective), perception (of objects, faces, and locations), language (word listening, reading, and production), working memory (phonological and visuo-spatial), semantic memory retrieval (intentional and incidental), episodic memory retrieval (verbal and nonverbal), priming, and procedural memory (conditioning and skill learning). For each process, we identify activation patterns including the most consistently involved regions. These regions constitute important components of the network of brain regions that underlie each function.


2017 ◽  
Vol 235 (3) ◽  
pp. 695-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marije Kaag ◽  
Anna E. Goudriaan ◽  
Taco J. De Vries ◽  
Tommy Pattij ◽  
Reinout W. Wiers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document