scholarly journals Association of Positive Fluid Balance and Mortality in Sepsis and Septic Shock in An Australian Cohort

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 737-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Pittard ◽  
S. J. Huang ◽  
A. S. McLean ◽  
S. R. Orde

In patients with septic shock, a correlation between positive fluid balance and worsened outcomes has been reported in multiple observational studies worldwide. No published data exists in an Australasian cohort. We set out to explore this association in our institution. We conducted a retrospective audit of patient records from August 2012 to May 2015 in a single-centre, 24-bed surgical and medical intensive care unit (ICU) in Sydney, Australia. All patients with septic shock were included. Exclusion criteria included length of stay less than 24 hours or vasopressors needed for less than six hours. Data was gathered on fluid balance for the first seven days of ICU admission, biochemical data and other clinical indices. The primary outcome measure was survival to hospital discharge. One hundred and eighty-six patients with septic shock were included, with an overall hospital mortality of 23.7%. Seventy-five percent of patients required mechanical ventilation, and 27.4% required haemodialysis. The mean daily fluid balance on the first day of admission was positive 1,424 ml and 1,394 ml for ICU and hospital survivors, respectively. On average, the daily fluid balance for non-survivors was higher than the survivors: ICU non-survivors were 602 (95% confidence intervals 230, 974) ml (P=0.0015) and hospital non-survivors were 530 [95% confidence intervals 197, 863] ml (P=0.0017) higher than the survivors. In line with other recently published data, after adjustment for confounders (severity of illness based on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score) we found a correlation between positive fluid balance and worsened hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock. Further research investigating rational use of fluids in this patient group is needed.

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Saes Vilaça de Oliveira ◽  
Flavio Geraldo Resende Freitas ◽  
Elaine Maria Ferreira ◽  
Isac de Castro ◽  
Antonio Toneti Bafi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bereket Molla Tigabu ◽  
Majid Davari ◽  
Abbas Kebriaeezadeh ◽  
Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh

Brain Injury ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-217
Author(s):  
Yanfei Shen ◽  
Xinmei Huang ◽  
Yongxia Hu ◽  
Weimin Zhang ◽  
Liquan Huang

2020 ◽  
pp. 106002802098072
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Durst ◽  
Elizabeth A. Eitzen ◽  
Scott T. Benken

Background Patients with cirrhosis have immune dysfunction, altered inflammatory response, and hemodynamic changes which increase risk of septic shock and potentially prolong management with fluids, vasopressors, and other therapies. Due to limited available guidance, this study aimed to characterize vasopressor use in patients with cirrhosis in relation to patients without cirrhosis in septic shock. Methods This was a retrospective matched cohort analysis of 122 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic medical center from January 2015 to November 2017. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of cirrhosis and matched based on severity of illness scoring. The primary outcome was vasopressor duration. Secondary comparisons included total vasopressor requirement, length of hospital and ICU stay, in-hospital mortality, change in organ function, and discharge disposition. Results The group with cirrhosis had significantly longer median (interquartile range [IQR]) durations of vasopressor therapy compared with the group without cirrhosis (86.0 [42.0-164.5] vs 39.0 [14.5-82.0] hours; P = 0.003) leading to increased median (IQR) vasopressor exposure (71.7 [15.5-239.5] vs 24.7 [5.3-77.9] mg norepinephrine [NE] equivalents; P = 0.003). No difference was found in in-hospital mortality between groups. However, regression analysis showed vasopressor exposure was associated with in-hospital mortality. Conclusion and Relevance Patients with cirrhosis in septic shock have increased vasopressor durations and overall requirements compared with patients without cirrhosis. Increased durations and requirements is associated with poorer outcomes independent of presence of cirrhosis. Future studies are needed to improve vasopressor treatment strategies and end points utilized in cirrhosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Kumar Mandal ◽  
Primo B. Valenzuela

Background: Neutrophil-Lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), a readily accessible biomarker, has become increasingly useful as predictive and prognostic tools in patients with various medical conditions. NLCR has also been reported to represent disease severity effectively.Aims and Objectives: To investigate NLCR on admission as a prognostic marker of bacteremia and in-hospital mortality in patients diagnosed with Sepsis and Septic Shock.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective study involves one-hundred twenty (120) adult patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock admitted to the IMCU and ICU from January 2015 to December 2016. Laboratory data and clinical outcomes were retrieved and documented from the laboratory and patients’ charts. A cut-off point of >10 was used to be a marker for bacteremia and hence, patients were stratified into two groups based on this cut-off. Out of 120, 78 patients (with mean age of 60) has NLCR of at least 10 while only 42 patients (with mean age of 55) has NCLR of at most 10.Results: A significant, strong and positive association between NLCR and in-hospital mortality was found (P=0.0001) indicating that an increased rate of mortality is observed for patients with persistently high NCLR. Results also indicated that NLCR is a significant predictor (P=0.0002) of in-hospital mortality via a logistic model. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for NLCR predicting in-hospital mortality showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8007 which is an indicative of high predictive power. Its sensitivity and specificity is calculated to be 97.37% and 93.18, respectively. Overall, the performance of NCLR as a predictor based on its computed hit rate is found to be approximately 93.33%.Conclusion: Increased NLCR levels were independently associated with unfavorable clinical prognosis in patients with sepsis. A high NLCR (>10) is significantly associated with in- hospital mortality. NCLR predicts in-hospital mortality with high accuracy, high precision and small misclassification.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.9(3) 2018 6-9


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 795-795
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sohaib ◽  
Hashmi Madiha ◽  
Faisal Shamim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document