When Should We Repair Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears? Outcome Comparison Between Immediate Surgical Repair Versus Delayed Repair After 6-Month Period of Nonsurgical Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1091-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang-Soo Kim ◽  
Hyo-Jin Lee ◽  
Jong-Ho Kim ◽  
Dong-Young Noh
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Delayed Repair ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Repair Group ◽  
Group 1

Background: Patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) can be treated nonoperatively and/or undergo operative treatment, but the ideal time for surgical intervention is unclear. Purpose: To compare the results of immediate arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with repair after 6 months of nonoperative care of PTRCTs involving more than 50% of the tendon thickness. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The authors prospectively randomized and analyzed 78 consecutive patients diagnosed with either isolated bursal-side or articular-side PTRCTs (supraspinatus only). Group 1 (n = 44) received immediate rotator cuff repair. Group 2 (n = 34) received delayed rotator cuff repair after 6 months of nonoperative treatment. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and range of motion at initial visit; months 3, 6, and 12 postoperatively; and the last visit after 24 months were used for the evaluation. Cuff integrity was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging at 12 months postoperatively. Results: There were no significant differences in age, sex (18/26 vs 13/21, male/female), symptom duration, composition of PTRCTs, or clinical outcomes between groups 1 and 2 ( P > .05). In group 2, 10 patients voluntarily dropped out from the study due to improvement of symptoms during the 6 months of preoperative nonoperative treatment. The mean follow-up period in groups 1 and 2 was 31.9 ± 1.5 months and 37.0 ± 2.2 months, respectively. At the end of the study, both groups showed significant improvements in terms of functional scores and pain VAS scores compared with the initial period. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups, except for lower pain VAS score and higher ASES Score in group 2 at 6 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively, 1 patient from group 1 and 2 patients from group 2 experienced a retear. Conclusion: Both immediate surgical repair and delayed repair after nonsurgical care for PTRCTs were effective in improving clinical outcomes, and there was a very low incidence of retears in both groups. However, at 6 months postoperatively, superior functional outcomes were observed in the delayed repair group compared with the immediate repair group. A trial period of preoperative nonsurgical care is reasonable, and immediate surgical repair is not crucial for the treatment of PTRCT.

Equivalent Clinical Results of Arthroscopic Single-Row and Double-Row Suture Anchor Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1254-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Franceschi ◽  
Laura Ruzzini ◽  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Francesca Maria Martina ◽  
Bruno Beomonte Zobel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Repair Group ◽  
Group 1

Background Restoring the anatomical footprint may improve the healing and mechanical strength of repaired tendons. A double row of suture anchors increases the tendon-bone contact area, reconstituting a more anatomical configuration of the rotator cuff footprint. Hypothesis There is no difference in clinical and imaging outcome between single-row and double-row suture anchor technique repairs of rotator cuff tears. Study Design Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods The authors recruited 60 patients. In 30 patients, rotator cuff repair was performed with a single-row suture anchor technique (group 1). In the other 30 patients, rotator cuff repair was performed with a double-row suture anchor technique (group 2). Results Eight patients (4 in the single-row anchor repair group and 4 in the double-row anchor repair group) did not return at the final follow-up. At the 2-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the University of California, Los Angeles score and range of motion values. At 2-year follow-up, postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography in group 1 showed intact tendons in 14 patients, partial-thickness defects in 10 patients, and full-thickness defects in 2 patients. In group 2, magnetic resonance arthrography showed an intact rotator cuff in 18 patients, partial-thickness defects in 7 patients, and full-thickness defects in 1 patient. Conclusion Single- and double-row techniques provide comparable clinical outcome at 2 years. A double-row technique produces a mechanically superior construct compared with the single-row method in restoring the anatomical footprint of the rotator cuff, but these mechanical advantages do not translate into superior clinical performance.

Defining Indications for Rotator Cuff Repair: Predictors of Failure of Nonoperative Treatment of Chronic, Symptomatic, Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. e28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren R. Dunn ◽  
John E. (Jed) Kuhn ◽  
Keith Baumgarten ◽  
Julie Y. Bishop ◽  
Robert H. Brophy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Cuff Repair

No Advantages in Repairing a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior (SLAP) Lesion When Associated with Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients over Age 50

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Franceschi ◽  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Laura Ruzzini ◽  
Giacomo Rizzello ◽  
Nicola Maffulli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tear ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Slap Lesion ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Cuff Tear ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Group 1

Background Arthroscopic management has been recommended for some superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, but no studies have focused on patients over 50 years of age with rotator cuff tear and a type II SLAP lesion. Hypothesis In patients over 50 years of age with an arthroscopically confirmed lesion of the rotator cuff and a type II SLAP lesion, there is no difference between (1) repair of both lesions and (2) repair of the rotator cuff tear without repair of the SLAP II lesion but with a tenotomy of the long head of the biceps. Study Design Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods We recruited 63 patients. In 31 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and the type II SLAP lesion (group 1). In the other 32 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and tenotomized the long head of the biceps (group 2). Seven patients (2 in group 1 and 5 in group 2) were lost to final follow-up. Results At a minimum 2.9 years’ follow-up, statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score and range of motion values. In group 1 (SLAP repair and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a preoperative average rating of 10.4 (range, 6–14) to an average of 27.9 (range, 24–35) postoperatively ( P < .001). In group 2 (biceps tenotomy and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a preoperative average rating of 10.1 (range, 5–14) to an average of 32.1 (range, 30–35) postoperatively ( P < .001) There was a statistically significant difference in total postoperative UCLA scores and range of motion when comparing the 2 groups postoperatively ( P < .05). Conclusions There are no advantages in repairing a type II SLAP lesion when associated with a rotator cuff tear in patients over 50 years of age. The association of rotator cuff repair and biceps tenotomy provides better clinical outcome compared with repair of the type II SLAP lesion and the rotator cuff.

scholarly journals Surgical repairs of the Rotator Cuff Tears

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S M H Jafri ◽  
W A Khan ◽  
M Pervaiz ◽  
A Ghaffar ◽  
S Raziq
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Old Age ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Senior Author ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Cause Of Pain

Evaluation of 15 cases who underwent surgical rotator cuff repair is presented. This study extends from 1995 to 2001. Cases operated by senior author have been included in this study. The follow up ranges from 9 months to 4 years. Evaluation includes study as regard to pain relief, range of motion and strength achieved after surgery. In all cases acromion- plasty was done. Rotator cuff problem is a well-know cause of pain and disability in shoulder especially in old age. Good results after surgical repair of rupture rotator cuff have been well documented. To our best knowledge this is the first study in this country about results of surgical rotator cuff repair.

Defining Indications for Rotator Cuff Repair: Predictors of Failure of Nonoperative Treatment of Chronic, Symptomatic, Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. e23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren R. Dunn ◽  
John E. (Jed) Kuhn ◽  
Keith M. Baumgarten ◽  
Julie Y. Bishop ◽  
Robert H. Brophy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Cuff Repair

Is It Safe to Inject Corticosteroids Into the Glenohumeral Joint After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1694-1700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang-Soo Kim ◽  
Hong-Ki Jin ◽  
Hyo-Jin Lee ◽  
Hyung-Lae Cho ◽  
Wan-Seok Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Group 1

Background: Injection of intra-articular corticosteroids is effective for improving the recovery of range of motion (ROM) and pain in various conditions of the shoulder but its use is limited after rotator cuff repair owing to concern over the possible harmful effects of steroids on the repaired tendon. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of intra-articular corticosteroid injections on the clinical outcomes and cuff integrity of patients after rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Between March 2011 and April 2014, 80 patients with a small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tear were enrolled in this study and underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Forty patients received an injection of triamcinolone (40 mg) and lidocaine (1.5 mL) into the glenohumeral joint 8 weeks after surgery (group 1), while the remaining 40 patients received normal saline injection (group 2). Outcome measures—including ROM, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, pain visual analog scale, and Simple Shoulder Test score—were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and at the last follow-up. The integrity of the repaired tendon was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and classified per Sugaya classification at 8 weeks (before injection) and 12 months after surgery. Results: The mean follow-up period was 25.7 months. At 3 months postoperatively, patients in group 1 had a significantly higher ROM with respect to forward flexion ( P = .05), external rotation at the side ( P = .05), and external rotation at abduction ( P = .04) as compared with group 2, whereas no significant difference was noted between the groups for internal rotation behind the back ( P = .65). Patients in group 1 had significantly lower visual analog scale pain scores ( P = .02) and higher ASES scores (group 1, 68.90; group 2, 60.28; P = .02) at 3-month follow-up. However, there was no significant difference after 6 months with respect to ROM and ASES scores (group 1, 77.80; group 2, 75.88; P = .33). Retears (Sugaya classification IV and V) were determined by MRI at 12 months and observed in a total of 7 patients (8.8%): 3 from group 1 (7.5%) and 4 from group 2 (10%). No retears were observed on MRI in the remaining 73 patients (91.2%): 37 patients from group 1 and 36 patients from group 2. There was no statistically significant difference in rate of retears between groups ( P = .69). Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of corticosteroids after rotator cuff repair does not increase the risk of retears and is thus an effective and safe treatment method for increasing ROM (forward flexion, external rotation) and improving clinical score (ASES) during the early postoperative period of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.

The formation of perianchor fluid associated with various suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1506-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sae H. Kim ◽  
Seok H. Yang ◽  
Sung-Min Rhee ◽  
Kwang J. Lee ◽  
Hyong S. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Polylactic Acid ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Fluid Collection ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Fluid Formation ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Fluid Signal ◽  
Group 1

Aims The aim of this study was to compare the osseous reactions elicited by all-suture, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and two different biodegradable anchors used during rotator cuff repair. Patients and Methods Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair was performed in 73 patients. The patients were divided into two groups, in both of which two different medial-row anchors were used. In group 1, anchor A comprised 30% β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) + 70% fast-absorbing poly lactic-co-glycolic acid copolymer (85% polylactic acid enantiomers + 15% polyglycolic acid) and anchor B comprised all-sutures. In group 2, anchor C comprised 23% micro β-TCP + 77% polylactic acid enantiomers and anchor D comprised PEEK polymer. There were 37 patients in group 1 and 36 patients in group 2. The presence and severity of fluid collection around anchors and healing of the rotator cuff were assessed using MRI scans, approximately one year postoperatively. The severity of the collection was graded as 0 (no perianchor fluid signal), 1 (minimal perianchor fluid), 2 (local collection of fluid), 3 (fluid collection around the whole length of the anchor but of a diameter less than twice the anchor diameter), or 4 (fluid collection around the whole length of the anchor and of a diameter greater than twice the anchor diameter). Results A perianchor fluid signal was seen in three patients (8.1%) with anchor A, four (10.8%) with anchor B, 15 (41.7%) with anchor C, and 15 (41.7%) with anchor D. The severity of the collection around anchor was grade 2:1:0:0 for anchor A, grade 2:2:0:0 for anchor B, grade 12:2:0:1 for anchor C, and grade 11:3:0:1 for anchor D (grade 1:2:3:4, respectively). The prevalence and severity of fluid formation was not significantly different between anchors A and B, and anchors C and D. However, on intergroup analysis, there were significant differences for the prevalence and severity of fluid formation between anchors in group 1 and group 2. The prevalence of failure to heal was not significant in group 1 (seven, 18.9%) or group 2 (nine, 25.0%). There was no relationship between the presence of perianchor fluid and each type of anchor, and the integrity of the rotator cuff repair, in either group. Conclusion Despite the nonabsorbable nature of all-suture and PEEK anchors, all-suture anchors produced less osseous reaction after rotator cuff repair. In deciding which kind of anchor to use, consideration should be given not only to the strength of the initial fixation, but also to the postoperative biological reaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1506–1511

Sustained Delivery of Transforming Growth Factor β1 by Use of Absorbable Alginate Scaffold Enhances Rotator Cuff Healing in a Rabbit Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1441-1450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Pil Yoon ◽  
Chang-Hwa Lee ◽  
Jae Wook Jung ◽  
Hyun-Joo Lee ◽  
Yong-Soo Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Sustained Release ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Alginate Scaffold ◽  
Tgf Β1 ◽  
Group 1

Background: The failure rate for healing after rotator cuff repair is relatively high. Purpose: To establish a system for sustained release of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) using an alginate scaffold and evaluate the effects of the sustained release of TGF-β1 on rotator cuff healing in a rabbit model. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Before the in vivo animal study, a standard MTS assay was performed to evaluate cell proliferation and metabolic activity on the alginate scaffold. Additionally, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to confirm the capacity of the sustained release of TGF-β1-containing alginate scaffold. Once the in vitro studies were completed, bilateral supraspinatus tendon repairs were performed in 48 rabbits that were allocated to 3 groups (n = 16 each) (group 1, supraspinatus repair only; group 2, supraspinatus repair with TGF-β1 single injection; group 3, supraspinatus repair with TGF-β1 sustained release via an alginate-based delivery system). Biomechanical and histological analyses were performed to evaluate the quality of tendon-to-bone healing at 12 weeks after rotator cuff repair. Results: The cell proliferation rate of the alginate scaffold was 122.30% compared with the control (fresh medium) group, which confirmed that the alginate sheet had no cytotoxicity and enhanced cell proliferation. Additionally, the level of TGF-β1 was found to increase with time on the alginate scaffold. Biomechanically, group 3 exhibited a significantly heightened ultimate failure load compared with groups 1 and 2 (group 1, 74.89 ± 29.82 N; group 2, 80.02 ± 34.42 N; group 3, 108.32 ± 32.48 N; P = .011) and more prevalent midsubstance tear compared with group 1 ( P = .028). However, no statistical differences were found in the cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus tendon (group 1, 32.74 ± 9.38; group 2, 33.76 ± 8.89; group 3, 34.80 ± 14.52; P = .882) and ultimate stress (group 1, 2.62 ± 1.13 MPa; group 2, 2.99 ± 1.81 MPa; group 3, 3.62 ± 2.24 MPa; P = .317). Histologically, group 3 exhibited a significantly heightened modified total Bonar score (group 1, 5.00 ± 1.54; group 2, 6.12 ± 1.85; group 3, 7.50 ± 1.31; P = .001). In addition, the tendon-to-bone interface for group 3 demonstrated better collagen orientation, continuity, and organization, and the area of new fibrocartilage formation was more evident in group 3. Conclusion: At 12 weeks after rotator cuff repair, the authors found improved biomechanical and histological outcomes for sustained release of TGF-β1 using alginate scaffold in a rabbit model. Clinical Relevance: The alginate-bound growth factor delivery system might improve healing after rotator cuff repair in humans.

scholarly journals Repair Integrity and Functional Outcomes Between Knot-Tying and Knotless Suture-Bridge Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712110024
Author(s):  
Koray Şahin ◽  
Fatih Şentürk ◽  
Mehmet Ersin ◽  
Ufuk Arzu ◽  
Mechmet Chodza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Knot Tying ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Group 1

Background: Knot-tying suture-bridge (SB) rotator cuff repair may compromise the vascularity of the repaired tendon, causing tendon strangulation and medial repair failure. The knotless SB repair technique has been proposed to overcome this possibility and decrease retear rates. Purpose: To compare clinical and structural outcomes and retear patterns between the knot-tying and knotless SB techniques. We hypothesized that the knotless technique would result in lower retear rates owing to the preservation of intratendinous vascularity. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 104 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were randomly and prospectively allocated to undergo knot-tying (group 1) or knotless (group 2) SB repair. Clinical outcome measures included range of motion, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the Constant score for function. Repair integrity was evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging scans using the Sugaya classification. Retears were also classified according to their pattern as type 1 (lateral) or type 2 (medial). Results: Overall, 88 patients (group 1: n = 42 [mean ± SD age, 54.3 ± 9.8 years]; group 2: n = 46 [mean ± SD age, 55.8 ± 8.2 years]) were included in the final analysis. The mean ± SD follow-up period was 25.4 ± 8.3 and 23.3 ± 7.2 months for groups 1 and 2, respectively. From preoperatively to postoperatively, the mean VAS pain score improved significantly in both groups (group 1: from 7.4 ± 1.7 to 1.0 ± 1.7; group 2: from 7.1 ± 1.9 to 1.3 ± 2.0; P < .0001 for both), as did the mean ± SD Constant score (group 1: from 51.7 ± 13.4 to 86.0 ± 11.5; group 2: from 49.4 ± 18.4 to 87.2 ± 14.8; P < .0001 for both). There was no significant difference between the groups for the postoperative VAS or Constant score. The retear rate was not significantly different between the groups (19.0% [8/42] in group 1 and 28.3% [13/46] in group 2; P > .05). There was a significant difference in the type 2 failure rate (75.0% [6/8] in group 1 and 23.1% [3/13] in group 2; P = .03). Conclusion: Both techniques showed excellent improvement and comparable clinical outcomes, and there was no significant difference in retear rates. Consistent with previously published data, the type 2 failure rate was significantly higher with the knot-tying technique. Registration: NCT03982108 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

scholarly journals Evaluation of 3 different rehabilitation protocols after rotator cuff repair, and the effectiveness of pool therapy: a randomized control study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0000
Author(s):  
Alex Laedermann ◽  
Fayssal Kadri ◽  
Alec Cikes
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
The Self ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Independent Observer ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Objectives: Exercises performed in water have shown to improve strength and range of motion in various joint pathologies. This study aims to identify the best rehabilitation protocol for patients who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and the effectiveness of a pool therapy protocol. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for small to medium sized rotator cuff tears, with small to moderate retraction of the affected tendon and who underwent surgery between 2013 and 2016, were randomized in 3 different groups at the time of surgical indication. Groups: 1. Patients who had rehabilitation with physical therapy and no aquatic protocol; The "Dry group", 2. Patients who had rehabilitation with physical therapy, including an aquatic protocol; The "Pool Group", 3. Patients who had self-rehabilitation alone, with no physical therapist. The "Self Group" follow-up: all patients were assessed by an independent observer. The mean outcome measures consisted of pre and postoperative SSV, Constant score, and patient satisfaction. Patients were followed-up at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively, as well as in 1 and 2 years. Results: Group 1 (Dry group) and Group 2 (Pool group) showed better Constant scores 2 months postoperatively, although this was not statistically significant. However, patients in group 2 (Pool group) showed statistically better Constant scores and overall satisfaction 3 months postoperatively. All the groups had similar results 6 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, with slightly better outcomes for the Dry and Pool groups compared to the Self group. Conclusion: Water therapy after rotator cuff repair provides better early results compared to traditional "dry" rehabilitation or self-exercise therapy. The results remain better for patients who had pool or dry rehabilitation 1 and 2 years postoperatively, although the difference is not statistically significant in the long term.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document