scholarly journals Risk Factors for Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tears in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knee: An Epidemiological Analysis of 3956 Patients From the SANTI Study Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 598-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar Praz ◽  
Thais Dutra Vieira ◽  
Adnan Saithna ◽  
Nikolaus Rosentiel ◽  
Vikram Kandhari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Posterior Root ◽  
Medial Meniscal Tear ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) result in loss of hoop forces and significant increases in tibiofemoral contact pressures. Preoperative imaging lacks reliability; therefore, holding an appropriate index of suspicion, based on the epidemiology of and risk factors for LMPRT, may reduce the rate of missed diagnoses. Purpose: The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for lateral meniscus root lesions in a large series of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients who underwent primary or revision ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon between January 2011 and April 2018 were considered for study eligibility. From this overall population, all patients who underwent repair of an LMPRT were identified. The epidemiology of LMPRT was defined by the incidence within the study population, stratified by key demographic parameters. Potentially important risk factors for the presence of LMPRT were evaluated in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 3956 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were included in the study. An LMPRT was identified and repaired in 262 patients (6.6%). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that significant risk factors for LMPRT included a contact sports injury mechanism (7.8% incidence with contact sport mechanism vs 4.5% with noncontact mechanism; odds ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.266-2.285; P < .001) and the presence of a medial meniscal tear (7.9% incidence with medial meniscal tear vs 5.8% without; odds ratio, 1.532; 95% CI, 1.185-1.979; P < .001). Although the incidence of LMPRT in male patients (7.3%) was higher than in females (4.8%), this was not significant in multivariate analysis ( P = .270). Patient age, revision ACL reconstruction, and a preoperative side-to-side laxity difference ≥6 mm were not significant risk factors for LMPRT. Conclusion: The incidence of LMPRT was 6.6% in a large series of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Participation in contact sports and the presence of a concomitant medial meniscal tear were demonstrated to be important independent risk factors. Their presence should raise the index of suspicion for this injury pattern.

scholarly journals THE RATE OF MENISCUS TEARS IN ASSOCIATION WITH ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURIES INCREASES WITH AGE

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Christino ◽  
S. Clifton Willimon ◽  
Crystal Perkins ◽  
Belinda Schaafsma ◽  
Michael Busch
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequently associated with meniscal injury. Numerous authors have described associations between the presence of a meniscal tear at the time of ACL reconstruction and time to surgery and number of instability episodes1-3. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between age and the presence of a meniscal tear at the time of ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of consecutive pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent ACL reconstruction over a 3.5-year period at a single institution. Inclusion criteria were age less than 20 years and an ACL injury treated with knee arthroscopy and ACL reconstruction. Patients with multiligament knee injuries were excluded. A chart review was performed to obtain demographic information and intra-operative findings. Meniscus tears were defined as tears documented during diagnostic arthroscopy. Results: Four hundred sixty-one patients met inclusion criteria, including 226 males (49%) and 235 females (51%) with a mean age of 15 years (range 7 – 20 years). The right and left knees were affected equally. Two hundred seventy patients (80%) had intra-operative evidence of a meniscal tear, including 215 lateral meniscus tears (56%) and 119 medial meniscus tears (44%). Sixty-four patients (14%) had both medial and lateral meniscus tears. Age at surgery was found to be a statistically significant independent predictor of the presence of a meniscus tear, odds ratio=1.14, 95% CI (1.05 – 1.25), p=0.003. For every 1-year increase in age, there is a 14% increase in the odds of having a meniscus tear and this is depicted in the figure below. Among patients 13 years of age and younger (n = 89), 47% had a meniscus tear. In contrast, 62% of patients 14 – 19 years of age (n = 301) had a meniscus tear, which was significantly greater (p = 0.01). Age was also a statistically significant independent predictor following subgroup analysis of medial and lateral meniscus tears. For every one year increase in age at surgery, there was a 21% increase in the odds of having a medial meniscus tear (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% CI: (1.08 – 1.35), p<0.001) and a 13% increase in the odds of having a lateral meniscus tear (odds ratio = 1.13, 95% CI: (1.04 – 1.24), p=0.01. Conclusions: Among children and adolescents with anterior cruciate ligament tears, for every 1-year increase in age, there is a 14% increase in the odds of having a meniscus tear. Adolescents over the age of 13 years had a significantly greater rate of meniscus tears than did those 13 years of age and younger. A complete arthroscopic examination with close attention to the menisci is required to diagnose and treat meniscal tears. Surgeons should be comfortable with all meniscus repair techniques, including inside-out, outside-in, all-inside, radial, and transosseous root repairs as the majority of children and adolescent patients with ACL tears also have an associated meniscus tear. Anderson AF, Anderson CN. Correlation of meniscal and articular cartilage injuries in children and adolescents with timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2015;43(2):275-281. Millett PJ, Willis AA, Warren RF. Associated injuries in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament tears: does a delay in treatment increase the risk of meniscal tear? Arthroscopy 2002;18(9):955-959. Shieh A, Bastrom T, Roocroft J, et al. Meniscus tear patterns in relation to skeletal immaturity: children versus adolescents. Am J Sports Med 2013;41(12):2779-2783.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF SKELETAL MATURITY ON INCIDENCE OF ASSOCIATED MENISCAL AND CHONDRAL INJURIES IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURED KNEES

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0010
Author(s):  
Brett Heldt ◽  
Elsayed Attia ◽  
Raymond Guo ◽  
Indranil Kushare ◽  
Theodore Shybut
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Skeletal Maturity ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Acute anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) rupture is associated with a significant incidence of concomitant meniscal and chondral injuries. However, to our knowledge, the incidence of these concomitant injuries in skeletally immature(SI) versus skeletally mature(SM) patients has not been directly compared. SI patients are a unique subset of ACL patients because surgical considerations are different, and subsequent re-tear rates are high. However, it is unclear if the rates and types of meniscal and chondral injuries differ. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare associated meniscal and chondral injury patterns between SI and SM patients under age 21, treated with ACL reconstruction for an acute ACL tear. We hypothesized that no significant differences would be seen. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of primary ACL reconstructions performed from January 2012 to April 2020. Patients were stratified by skeletal maturity status based on a review of records and imaging. Demographic data was recorded, including age, sex, and BMI. Associated intra-articular meniscal injury, including laterality, location, configuration, and treatment were determined. Articular cartilage injury location, grade, and treatments were determined. Revision rates, non-ACL reoperation rates, and time to surgery were also compared between the two groups. Results: 785 SM and 208 SI patients met inclusion criteria. Mean BMI and mean age were significantly different between groups. Meniscal tear rates were significantly greater in SM versus SI patients in medial meniscus tears(P<.001), medial posterior horn tears(P=.001), medial longitudinal tears configuration(P=.007), lateral Radial configuration(P=.002), and lateral complex tears(P=.011). Medial repairs(P<.001) and lateral partial meniscectomies(P=.004) were more likely in the SM group. There was a significantly greater number of chondral injuries in the SM versus SI groups in the Lateral(p=.007) and medial compartments(P<.001). SM patients had a significantly increased number of outerbridge grade 1 and 2 in the Lateral(P<.001) and Medial Compartments(P=.013). ACL revisions(P=.019) and Non-ACL reoperations(P=.002) were significantly greater in the SI patients compared to SM. No other significant differences were noted. Conclusion: SM ACL injured patients have a significantly higher rate of medial meniscus tears and medial longitudinal configurations treated with repair, and a significantly higher rate of radial and/or complex lateral meniscus tears treated with partial meniscectomy compared to the SI group. We also found a significantly higher rate of both medial and lateral compartment chondral injuries, mainly grades 1 and 2, in SM compared to SI patients. Conversely, SI ACL reconstruction patients had higher revision and subsequent non-ACL surgery rates.

Risk factors for progression of articular cartilage damage after anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (3) ◽  
pp. 285-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Nakamae ◽  
N. Adachi ◽  
M. Deie ◽  
M. Ishikawa ◽  
T. Nakasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cartilage Damage ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Articular Cartilage Damage ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Aims To investigate the risk factors for progression of articular cartilage damage after anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Patients and Methods A total of 174 patients who underwent second-look arthroscopic evaluation after anatomical ACL reconstruction were enrolled in this study. The graded condition of the articular cartilage at the time of ACL reconstruction was compared with that at second-look arthroscopy. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), ACL reconstruction technique, meniscal conditions, and other variables were assessed by regression analysis as risk factors for progression of damage to the articular cartilage. Results In the medial compartment, multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that partial medial meniscectomy (odds ratio (OR) 6.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.11 to 22.04, p = 0.001), pivot-shift test grade at the final follow-up (OR 3.53, CI 1.39 to 8.96, p = 0.008), BMI (OR 1.15, CI 1.03 to 1.28, p = 0.015) and medial meniscal repair (OR 3.19, CI 1.24 to 8.21, p = 0.016) were significant risk factors for progression of cartilage damage. In the lateral compartment, partial lateral meniscectomy (OR 10.94, CI 4.14 to 28.92, p < 0.001) and side-to-side differences in anterior knee laxity at follow-up (OR 0.63, p = 0.001) were significant risk factors. Conclusion Partial meniscectomy was found to be strongly associated with the progression of articular cartilage damage despite r anatomical ACL reconstruction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:285–93.

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kraus Schmitz ◽  
V. Lindgren ◽  
P-M. Janarv ◽  
M. Forssblad ◽  
A. Stålman
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Knee Ligament ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in a nationwide cohort. Patients and Methods All ACL reconstructions, primary and revision, that were recorded in the Swedish Knee Ligament Register (SKLR) between 2006 and 2013 were linked with data from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. The incidence of VTE was determined by entries between the day of surgery until 90 days postoperatively based on diagnosis codes and the prescription of anticoagulants. Risk factors, outcome, and the use of thromboprophylaxis were analyzed. Descriptive statistics with multivariate analysis were used to describe the findings. Results The cohort consisted of 26 014 primary and revision ACL reconstructions. There were 89 deep venous thromboses (DVTs) and 12 pulmonary emboli (PEs) with a total of 95 VTEs (0.4 %). Six patients with a PE had a simultaneous DVT. The only independent risk factor for VTE was age greater than or equal to 40 years (odds ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval 1.45 to 3.70; p < 0.001). Thromboprophylaxis was prescribed to 9461 patients (36%) and was equally distributed between those with and those without a VTE (37.9% vs 36.4%). All patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) one and two years postoperatively were significantly lower in those with VTE. Conclusion The incidence of VTE following ACL reconstruction is 0.4%, and the only significant risk factor is age. Patients with VTE had worse postoperative clinical outcome than patients without VTE. We recommend against the routine use of thromboprophylaxis, but it should be considered in older patients.

Effect of Delayed Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Medial Compartment Cartilage and Meniscal Health

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1816-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua S. Everhart ◽  
J. Caid Kirven ◽  
Moneer M. Abouljoud ◽  
Alex C. DiBartola ◽  
Christopher C. Kaeding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Medial Compartment ◽  
Meniscal Injury ◽  
Chondral Injury ◽  
Medial Meniscal Tear ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Outerbridge Grade

Background: The time required to develop a secondary cartilage or meniscal injury in the medial compartment after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is not well understood. Purpose: To determine the association between time delay until ACL reconstruction and the presence of medial compartment Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 chondral injury or medial meniscal tear requiring treatment. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 609 patients underwent primary ACL reconstruction at a single institution at a median 46 days between injury and surgery (61.4% male; mean age, 26.5 years [SD, 11.1]). Chondral status was graded according to Outerbridge criteria at the time of surgery. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between time delay until surgery and medial compartment chondral injury or meniscal injury requiring treatment. Adjustment was performed as needed for patient demographics, sporting activity, and prior knee injuries. Time until surgery had a nonlinear association with medial compartment health and was more effectively described in discrete intervals rather than as a continuous variable. The optimal time intervals to predict medial compartment health were determined by comparison of Bayes information criterion values between fully adjusted regression models. Results: After controlling for relevant confounders, delay of surgery >8 weeks had an increased likelihood of a medial meniscal tear requiring partial meniscectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.30; 95% CI, 1.04-5.12; P = .04) and a decreased likelihood of a meniscal tear requiring repair (aOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32-0.76; P = .001). Delay of surgery >5 months had an increased likelihood of a medial Outerbridge grade ≥3 chondral defect (aOR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.64-5.87; P = .001) or a grade 4 defect (aOR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.75-8.45; P = .001). Conclusion: From the time of ACL injury, risk of an irreparable medial meniscal tear found at the time of ACL reconstruction is significantly increased by 8 weeks, and risk of high-grade medial chondral damage is increased by 5 months.

scholarly journals Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in National Basketball Association Players

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596712098164
Author(s):  
Steven F. DeFroda ◽  
Devan D. Patel ◽  
John Milner ◽  
Daniel S. Yang ◽  
Brett D. Owens
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Case Series ◽  
National Basketball Association ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in National Basketball Association (NBA) players can have a significant impact on player longevity and performance. Current literature reports a high rate of return to play, but there are limited data on performance after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine return to play and player performance in the first and second seasons after ACLR in NBA players. We hypothesized that players would return at a high rate. However, we also hypothesized that performance in the first season after ACLR would be worse as compared with the preinjury performance, with a return to baseline by postoperative year 2. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: An online database of NBA athlete injuries between 2010 and 2019 was queried using the term ACL reconstruction. For the included players, the following data were recorded: name; age at injury; position; height, weight, and body mass index; handedness; NBA experience; dates of injury, surgery, and return; knee affected; and postoperative seasons played. Regular season statistics for 1 preinjury season and 2 postoperative seasons were compiled and included games started and played, minutes played, and player efficiency rating. Kaplan-Meier survivorship plots were computed for athlete return-to-play and retirement endpoints. Results: A total of 26 athletes underwent ACLR; of these, 84% (95% CI, 63.9%-95.5%) returned to play at a mean 372.5 days (95% CI, 323.5-421.5 days) after surgery. Career length after injury was a mean of 3.36 seasons (95% CI, 2.27-4.45 seasons). Factors that contributed to an increased probability of return to play included younger age at injury (odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.47-0.92]; P = .0337) and fewer years of experience in the NBA before injury (odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.45-0.93]; P = .0335). Postoperatively, athletes played a significantly lower percentage of total games in the first season (48.4%; P = .0004) and second season (62.1%; P = .0067) as compared with the preinjury season (78.5%). Player efficiency rating in the first season was 19.3% less than that in the preinjury season ( P = .0056). Performance in the second postoperative season was not significantly different versus preinjury. Conclusion: NBA players have a high rate of RTP after ACLR. However, it may take longer than a single season for elite NBA athletes to return to their full preinjury performance. Younger players and those with less NBA experience returned at higher rates.

scholarly journals DELAY TO ACL RECONSTRUCTION IN PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT PATIENTS IS ASSOCIATED WITH A LINEAR INCREASE IN THE RISK OF MEDIAL MENISCAL TEARS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0004
Author(s):  
David A. Kolin ◽  
Brody Dawkins ◽  
Joshua Park ◽  
Peter D. Fabricant ◽  
Allison Gilmore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Linear Increase ◽  
Meniscal Injury ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Text Figure ◽  
Time From Injury

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequently associated with meniscal tears. Previous studies have shown that secondary meniscal tears—occurring after the initial ACL injury—are associated with greater delays from injury to ACL reconstruction (ACLR), but frequently use dichotomous categories of acute versus delayed ACLR. Purpose: As meniscal damage is likely accrued constantly over time, we investigated the variability of concurrent meniscal injuries as a function of time from injury to ACLR in a pediatric and adolescent population. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients ≤18 years who underwent an ACLR between 2014 and 2018 at one of two tertiary academic hospitals. Outliers were excluded if time from injury to ACLR was greater than 78 weeks. Records were reviewed to assess patients’ dates of injury and surgery. The prevalence of concurrent medial and/or lateral meniscal injury was evaluated at the time of surgery for each patient. Adjusted relative risks (ARRs) of meniscal injury were calculated using Poisson regression models adjusted for age, sex, and body-mass index. Logistic regression was used to model the predicted probability of medial meniscal tears. Results: 546 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age of participants was 15.3 years (S.D., 1.6), and 277 (50.7%) patients were male. Overall, 344 (63.0%) patients had a meniscal tear. 169 (49.1%) tears occurred at the medial meniscus, and 257 (74.7%) occurred at the lateral meniscus (Table 1). Compared to females, males had a greater risk of lateral meniscal injury (ARR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.20-1.77) but not medial meniscal injury (ARR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.77-1.31) (Figure 1). When considering all meniscal tears, time from injury to ACLR was not associated with increased risk of a tear (ARR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01). However, for medial meniscal tears, there was a significant association between time from injury to ACLR, in weeks, and meniscal tears (ARR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03, P = 0.003). A ten-week delay was associated with a 20% increased risk of medial meniscal injury (Figure 2). Conclusion: In pediatric and adolescent ACLR patients, the risk of any meniscal injury was not associated with delay from injury to surgery. However, the risk of medial meniscal injury increased by 2% each week from injury to surgery. [Table: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

The Incidence of Subsequent Meniscal Surgery Is Higher in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Reconstructed Knee Than in the Contralateral Knee

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (14) ◽  
pp. 3216-3222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent R. Davis ◽  
Jason Chen ◽  
Maria C.S. Inacio ◽  
Rebecca Love ◽  
Heather A. Prentice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Contralateral Knee ◽  
Meniscal Surgery ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Reconstructed Knee

Background: A goal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to provide a meniscal protective effect for the knee. Purpose: (1) To evaluate whether there was a different likelihood of subsequent meniscal surgery in the ACL-reconstructed knee or in the normal contralateral knee and (2) to compare the risk factors associated with subsequent meniscal surgery in the ACL-reconstructed knee and contralateral knee. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Using an integrated health care system’s ACL reconstruction registry, patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction, with no meniscal injury at the time of index surgery and a normal contralateral knee, were evaluated. Subsequent meniscal tears associated with ACL graft revision were excluded. Subsequent meniscal surgery in either knee was the outcome of interest. Sex, age, and graft type were assessed as potential risk factors. Survival analysis was used to compare meniscal surgery–free survival rates and to assess risk factors of subsequent meniscal surgery. Results: Of 4087 patients, there were 32 (0.78%) patients who underwent subsequent meniscal surgery in the index knee and 9 (0.22%) in the contralateral knee. The meniscal surgery–free survival rate at 4 years was 99.08% (95% CI, 98.64%-99.37%) in the index knee and 99.65% (95% CI, 99.31%-99.82%) in the contralateral knee. There was a 3.73 (95% CI, 1.73-8.04; P < .001) higher risk of subsequent meniscal surgery in the index knee compared with the contralateral knee, or a 0.57% absolute risk difference. After adjustments, allografts (hazard ratio [HR], 5.06; 95% CI, 1.80-14.23; P = .002) and hamstring autografts (HR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.06-9.10; P = .038) were risk factors for subsequent meniscal surgery in the index knee compared with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autografts. Conclusion: After ACL reconstruction, the overall risk of subsequent meniscal surgery was low. However, the relative risk of subsequent meniscal surgery in the ACL-reconstructed knee was higher compared with the contralateral knee. Only graft type was found to be a risk factor for subsequent meniscal surgery in the ACL-reconstructed knee, with a higher risk for allografts and hamstring autografts compared with BPTB autografts.

Ten-Year Risk Factors for Inferior Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study of 874 Patients From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 2851-2858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Hamrin Senorski ◽  
Eleonor Svantesson ◽  
Kurt P. Spindler ◽  
Eduard Alentorn-Geli ◽  
David Sundemo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Knee Injury ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Ligament ◽  
Related Risk ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Factors relating to the patient and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may help to identify prognostic factors of long-term outcome after reconstruction. Purpose: To determine 10-year risk factors for inferior knee function after ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register were extracted for patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2006. Patients who had no data at the 10-year follow-up for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were excluded. Multivariable proportional odds regression modeling was used to assess 10-year patient- and surgery-related risk factors across all the KOOS subscales and the KOOS4 (mean score of 4 subscales: pain, knee-related symptoms, function in sport and recreation, and knee-related quality of life). Results: A total of 874 (41%) patients were included (male, 51.5%; median age at the time of ACL reconstruction, 27.5 years [range, 11.2-61.5 years]). An increase in the severity of concomitant articular cartilage injuries resulted in a reduced KOOS on 4 subscales (odds ratio, 0.64-0.80; P < .05). A higher preoperative KOOS pain score increased the odds of a higher score on the pain, symptoms, and sport subscales and the KOOS4. In addition, a higher preoperative body mass index was a significant risk factor for lower scores on 3 KOOS subscales and the KOOS4. No patient- or surgery-related predictor was significant across all KOOS subscales. Conclusion: This 10-year risk factor analysis identified several factors that can affect long-term knee function after ACL reconstruction. Most risk factors were related to preoperative patient-reported outcome and potentially modifiable. On the other hand, most of the surgery-related risk factors were nonmodifiable. Nevertheless, this information may be helpful to physicians and physical therapists counseling patients on their expectations of outcome after ACL reconstruction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document