The Effect of Preexisting and Shoulder-Specific Depression and Anxiety on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (13) ◽  
pp. 3073-3079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Lau ◽  
Melissa Scribani ◽  
Jocelyn Wittstein
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
History Of ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
History Of Depression

Background: Few studies have considered the potential effect of depression or anxiety on outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a preexisting diagnosis of depression or anxiety, as well as the feeling of depression and anxiety directly related to the shoulder, on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were evaluated by the ASES score preoperatively and at a minimum 12 months postoperatively as part of the senior author’s shoulder registry. Preexisting diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety were recorded, and questions from the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index directed at feelings of depression or anxiety related to the shoulder were also evaluated. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare ASES scores between patients with and without anxiety and/or depression. Spearman correlation was used to correlate questions on depression and anxiety with ASES scores. Results: A total of 187 patients (63 females, 124 males; mean age, 58.6 years, SD, 8.7 years) undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 47.5 months (SD, 17.4 months; range, 12-77 months). Fifty-three patients (mean age, 60 years; SD, 8.6 years) had preexisting diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety and 134 patients (mean age, 58.1 years; SD, 8.7 years) did not. Patients with depression and/or anxiety had significantly lower preoperative and postoperative ASES scores (60.7 vs 67.8, P = .014; and 74.6 vs 87.1, P = .008, respectively). The change in ASES scores from preoperative to postoperative, however, was not significantly different (18.0 vs 14.9). A higher score of depression or anxiety related to the shoulder had a negative correlation with the preoperative ( r = −0.76, P < .0001; and r = −0.732, P < .0001, respectively) and postoperative ( r = −0.31, P = .0001; and r = −0.31, P = .0003, respectively) ASES scores, but a positive correlation ( r = 0.50, P < .0001; and r = 0.43, P < .0001, respectively) with the change in ASES scores. Conclusion: Patients with a history of depression and/or anxiety have lower outcome scores preoperatively and postoperatively; however, they should expect the same amount of relief from arthroscopic rotator cuff repair as those without a history of depression or anxiety. Stronger feelings of depression or anxiety directly related to the shoulder correlated with lower preoperative and postoperative outcome scores, but a greater amount of improvement from surgery. The results from this study suggest that a preexisting diagnosis of depression or anxiety, as well as feelings of depression or anxiety directly related to the shoulder, should be considered during the management of patients with rotator cuff tears.

Recall Bias in Retrospective Assessment of Preoperative Patient-Reported American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1471-1475
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Gotlin ◽  
Matthew T. Kingery ◽  
Samuel L. Baron ◽  
Joseph McCafferty ◽  
Laith M. Jazrawi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Recall Bias ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Shoulder Dysfunction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: The gold-standard method for collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is the prospective assessment of preoperative to postoperative change. However, this method is not always feasible because of unforeseen cases or emergencies, logistical and infrastructure barriers, and cost issues. In such cases, a retrospective approach serves as a potential alternative, but there are conflicting conclusions regarding the reliability of the recalled preoperative PROs after orthopaedic procedures. Purpose: To assess the agreement between prospectively and retrospectively collected PROs for a common, low-risk procedure. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between May 2012 and September 2017 at the study institution were identified. All of the patients completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standard Shoulder Assessment Form preoperatively at their preassessment appointment. Patients were then contacted in the postoperative period and asked to recall their preoperative condition while completing another ASES form. Results: A total of 84 patients completed the telephone survey and were included in this analysis (mean age, 57.40 ± 9.96 years). The mean duration of time from onset of shoulder symptoms to surgery was 9.13 ± 9.08 months. The mean duration of time between surgery and recall ASES administration was 39.12 ± 17.37 months. The mean recall ASES score was significantly lower than the preoperative ASES score (30.69 ± 16.93 vs 51.42 ± 19.14; P < .001). There was poor test-retest reliability between preoperative ASES and recall ASES (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.292; 95% CI, –0.07, 0.57; P = .068). Greater age at the time of recall, a shorter symptomatic period before surgery, and less severe preoperative shoulder dysfunction were associated with a greater difference between preoperative ASES and recall ASES. Conclusion: Retrospectively reported PROs are subject to significant recall bias. Recalled PROs were almost always lower than their prospectively recorded counterparts. Recalled PROs are more likely to be accurate when reported by younger patients, those with a longer duration of symptoms, and those with more severe preoperative conditions.

scholarly journals Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Robert Waterman ◽  
Jonathan Newgren ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Brandon C. Cabarcas ◽  
Bernard R. Bach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Objectives: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. Methods: Between 2007-2011, prospectively-enrolled patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears were previously randomized into either acromioplasty or non-acromioplasty groups. Patients with death, advanced neurologic conditions, or subsequent shoulder arthroplasty were excluded. Baseline and long-term follow-up questionnaires, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and Constant scores were obtained. Rates of revision rotator cuff surgery, or secondary reoperation were recorded. Averages with standard deviation (SD) were calculated, and t-tests were utilized to compare outcomes of interest between cohorts. Results: After exclusion of 5 additional patients from the short-term follow-up study, 66 of 90 patients (73.3%) were available at 92.4 months (±10.5). Comparison of baseline demographics and intraoperative information revealed no significant differences, including age, gender, workers compensation, acute mechanism of injury, tear size, degree of retraction, and surgical technique (e.g. single- vs. double-row). At final follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences according to ASES (p=0.33), VAS pain (p=0.79), Constant (p=0.17), SST (p=0.05), UCLA (p=0.19), and SF-12 (p=0.79) in patients with and without acromioplasty (Figure 1). One patient with acromioplasty (2.9%) and two patients without acromioplasty (6.3%) sustained atraumatic recurrent rotator cuff tear with secondary repair (p=0.99). Conclusion: Combined acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair offer no significant long-term benefits in patient-reported outcomes or secondary surgery when compared to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone. [Figure: see text]

scholarly journals Sex-Based Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711988195
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Daniels ◽  
Cory M. Stewart ◽  
Kirsten D. Garvey ◽  
Emily M. Brook ◽  
Laurence D. Higgins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Rotator cuff repair is one of the most common surgical procedures performed on the shoulder. Previous studies have indicated that pain and disability can vary significantly between patients with similarly appearing rotator cuff tears on diagnostic imaging. Prior literature has compared functional outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatments as well as variability in surgical techniques. However, few studies have examined postoperative outcomes based on patient factors such as sex. Purpose: To compare patient-reported outcomes after rotator cuff repair between men and women. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 283 patients (153 male, 130 female) who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were included in this study; of those, 275 patients (97.2%) completed 1-year follow-up. Patient-reported pain visual analog scale (VAS), Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12 mental and physical components), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were collected preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively using an electronic outcomes system. Results: Women reported higher VAS pain scores when compared with men preoperatively ( P < .01) and at 2 weeks ( P < .01), 6 weeks ( P < .01), and 3 months ( P = .02) postoperatively. Additionally, women experienced a greater overall change in the mean VAS score preoperatively when compared with 1 year postoperatively ( P < .01). The use of narcotic pain medication 2 weeks after surgery was greater in women ( P = .032). Women had significantly lower preoperative VR-12 mental scores ( P = .03) and experienced a greater increase in the mean VR-12 mental score preoperatively when compared with 1 year postoperatively ( P < .01). Men had higher ASES scores preoperatively ( P < .01) and at 3 months postoperatively ( P < .01). Women experienced a greater overall change in the ASES score preoperatively when compared with 1 year postoperatively ( P < .01). Conclusion: Women reported greater pain and decreased shoulder function compared with men during the initial 3 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. There were no sex-based differences in patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up. The results of this study indicate that there are sex-related differences in the early postoperative recovery of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair, contributing to postoperative expectations for both clinicians and patients alike.

Establishing Maximal Medical Improvement After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1000-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Zuke ◽  
Timothy S. Leroux ◽  
Bonnie P. Gregory ◽  
Austin Black ◽  
Brian Forsythe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Orthopaedic Care ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: As health care transitions from a pay-for-service to a pay-for-performance infrastructure, the value of orthopaedic care must be defined accurately. Significant efforts have been made in defining quality and cost in arthroplasty; however, there remains a lag in ambulatory orthopaedic care. Purpose: Two-year follow-up has been a general requirement for reporting outcomes after rotator cuff repair. However, this time requirement has not been established scientifically and is of increasing importance in the era of value-based health care. Given that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a common ambulatory orthopaedic procedure, the purpose of this study was to establish a time frame for maximal medical improvement (the state when improvement has stabilized) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, identifying studies reporting sequential patient-reported outcomes up to a minimum of 2 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The primary clinical outcome was patient-reported outcomes at 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Secondary clinical outcomes included range of motion, strength, retears, and complications. Clinically significant improvement was determined between various time intervals by use of the minimal clinically important difference. Results: The review included 19 studies including 1370 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair. Clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes was seen up to 1 year after rotator cuff repair, but no clinical significance was noted from 1 year to 2 years. The majority of improvement in strength and range of motion was seen up to 6 months, but no clinically meaningful improvement was seen thereafter. All reported complications and the majority of retears occurred within 6 months after rotator cuff repair. Conclusion: After rotator cuff repair, a clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and strength was seen up to 1 year after surgery, but not beyond this. This information is important not only to establish appropriate patient expectations but also to determine a time frame for outcome collection after surgery to better define value in orthopaedic care.

scholarly journals Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0044
Author(s):  
Brandon J. Manderle ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Joseph Liu ◽  
Alexander Beletsky ◽  
Charles A. Bush-Joseph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Minimally Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Objectives: To define the time-dependent nature of the minimally clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). Methods: A prospectively maintained institutional registry was queried for all patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR from 2014-2017 with completed pre-operative, 6 month, 1 and 2 year patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) surveys. MCID, SCB and PASS were calculated for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) using anchor-based methodology with receiver operating curve/area under curve analysis. Time to MCID, SCB and PASS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A Cox multivariate regression model was used to calculate hazard ratios with respect to preoperative factors and intraoperative pathology. Results: 95 patients were included. Average age was 56.9 ± 9.5 years, average BMI was 30.8 ± 7.0 kg/m2. Mean symptom duration was 8.5 ± 7.8 months. Established MCID, SCB, PASS for the ASES were 11.1, 17.5, and 86.7 respectively. A total of 94.8% achieved MCID, 84.4% achieved SCB, and 54.6% achieved thresholds for PASS. Median achievement of MCID, SCB, and PASS occurred at 161, 166, and 347 days, respectively. Older patients had an increased likelihood of achieving MCID and SCB (HR: 1.036, 95% CI: 1.009, 1.064, p=0.009 and HR: 1.026, 95% CI: 1.000, 1.051, p=0.045, respectively). Lower preoperative score increased the likelihood of achieving SCB (HR: 0.976, 95% CI: 0.964, 0.989, p<0.001). Sustaining a dominant sided injury reduced the likelihood of achieving PASS (HR: 0.692, 95% CI: 0.513, 0.932, p=0.015). Conclusion: This study established the timeline to reach MCID, SCB and PASS in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic RCR. 80% of patients can expect to achieve MCID and SCB within one year, while 50% achieve PASS at this time point. Future studies should account for this trend in improvement when determining appropriate follow-up. [Figure: see text][Table: see text]

scholarly journals Swiss-wide multicentre evaluation and prediction of core outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: protocol for the ARCR_Pred cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e045702
Author(s):  
Laurent Audigé ◽  
Heiner C C Bucher ◽  
Soheila Aghlmandi ◽  
Thomas Stojanov ◽  
David Schwappach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Prognostic Models ◽  
Shoulder Range Of Motion ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

IntroductionIn the field of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), reporting standards of published studies differ dramatically, notably concerning adverse events (AEs). In addition, prognostic studies are overall methodologically poor, based on small data sets and explore only limited numbers of influencing factors. We aim to develop prognostic models for individual ARCR patients, primarily for the patient-reported assessment of shoulder function (Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)) and the occurrence of shoulder stiffness 6 months after surgery. We also aim to evaluate the use of a consensus core event set (CES) for AEs and validate a severity classification for these events, considering the patient’s perspective.Methods and analysisA cohort of 970 primary ARCR patients will be prospectively documented from several Swiss and German orthopaedic clinics up to 24 months postoperatively. Patient clinical examinations at 6 and 12 months will include shoulder range of motion and strength (Constant Score). Tendon repair integrity status will be assessed by ultrasound at 12 months. Patient-reported questionnaires at 6, 12 and 24 months will determine functional scores (subjective shoulder value, OSS), anxiety and depression scores, working status, sports activities, and quality of life (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level questionnaire). AEs will be documented according to a CES. Prognostic models will be developed using an internationally supported regression methodology. Multiple prognostic factors, including patient baseline demographics, psychological, socioeconomic and clinical factors, rotator cuff integrity, concomitant local findings, and (post)operative management factors, will be investigated.Ethics and disseminationThis project contributes to the development of personalised risk predictions for supporting the surgical decision process in ARCR. The consensus CES may become an international reference for the reporting of complications in clinical studies and registries. Ethical approval was obtained on 1 April 2020 from the lead ethics committee (EKNZ, Basel, Switzerland; ID: 2019-02076). All participants will provide informed written consent before enrolment in the study.Trial registration numberNCT04321005.Protocol versionVersion 2 (13 December 2019).

scholarly journals Bilateral single-staged arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is comparable to staged procedures: a retrospective follow up study of 2 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Wang ◽  
Pu Yang ◽  
Dongfang Zhang ◽  
In-Ho Jeon ◽  
Tengbo Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair

Abstract Background Bilateral rotator cuff tears are not uncommon and the timing of the surgical treatment of both shoulders is debated. In the present study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent single-stage or staged bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods From March 2013 to May 2018, a retrospective review on all patients who underwent bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at our department was performed. Patients were separated into 2 groups: single-stage and staged. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. The visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Constant-Murley (Constant) score, the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder and the hospitalization costs were evaluated for comparison between the two groups before and after the operation. Differences between groups were assessed using t-tests and ANOVA. Results All 51 patients completed follow-up of 2 years, single stage (n = 24) and staged group (n = 27). There was no significant difference in the VAS, ASES, UCLA and Constant scores between the single-stage group and the staged group before the operation. Postoperative clinical scores were significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.05). All outcome scores were significantly different between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively, and the staged scored better than the single-stage (P < 0.05). At 12, 18, and 24 months after the operation, the outcome scores were not significantly different between the two groups. At follow-up, the ROM of the shoulder was not significantly different between the two groups. In the single-stage group, the outcome scores and ROM were similar for both shoulders and comparable to the staged group. We also found significant cost savings in the single-stage group (4440.89 ± 130.55 USD) compared to the staged group (5065.73 ± 254.76 USD) (p < 0.05). Conclusions Patients receiving single-stage or staged bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed similarly good clinical outcomes at follow-ups longer than 6 months. Moreover, good outcomes were observed on both sides of the single-stage group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document