Bilateral single-staged arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is comparable to staged procedures: a retrospective follow up study of 2 years

Abstract Background Bilateral rotator cuff tears are not uncommon and the timing of the surgical treatment of both shoulders is debated. In the present study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent single-stage or staged bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods From March 2013 to May 2018, a retrospective review on all patients who underwent bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at our department was performed. Patients were separated into 2 groups: single-stage and staged. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. The visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Constant-Murley (Constant) score, the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder and the hospitalization costs were evaluated for comparison between the two groups before and after the operation. Differences between groups were assessed using t-tests and ANOVA. Results All 51 patients completed follow-up of 2 years, single stage (n = 24) and staged group (n = 27). There was no significant difference in the VAS, ASES, UCLA and Constant scores between the single-stage group and the staged group before the operation. Postoperative clinical scores were significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.05). All outcome scores were significantly different between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively, and the staged scored better than the single-stage (P < 0.05). At 12, 18, and 24 months after the operation, the outcome scores were not significantly different between the two groups. At follow-up, the ROM of the shoulder was not significantly different between the two groups. In the single-stage group, the outcome scores and ROM were similar for both shoulders and comparable to the staged group. We also found significant cost savings in the single-stage group (4440.89 ± 130.55 USD) compared to the staged group (5065.73 ± 254.76 USD) (p < 0.05). Conclusions Patients receiving single-stage or staged bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed similarly good clinical outcomes at follow-ups longer than 6 months. Moreover, good outcomes were observed on both sides of the single-stage group.

Download Full-text

Biceps Tenodesis Combined With Rotator Cuff Repair Increases Functional Status And Elbow Strength In Both Operated And Contralateral Arms

10.21203/rs.3.rs-94002/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ali Ihsan KILIC ◽

Onur HAPA ◽

Ramadan OZMANEVRA ◽

Nihat Demirhan DEMIRKIRAN ◽

Onur GURSAN

Keyword(s):

Rotator Cuff ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Constant Score ◽

Elbow Flexion ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Biceps Tenodesis ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽

Cuff Repair

Abstract Purpose: Aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the elbow flexion and supination strengths, and the functional outcomes of patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair combined with simultaneous biceps tenodesis.Methods: Nineteen patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and biceps tenodesis with at least 24 months follow-up were included. Patients were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for bicipital groove pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and constant scores(CS), biceps apex distance (BAD), elbow flexion and supination strengths.Results: VAS for biceps groove measurement averages of postoperative 6th, 12th and 24th month were lower in comparison to pre-operative data and were considered to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Constant score, an average of all post-operative measurements and scores were found higher than pre-operative values and was considered to be statistically significant (p<0,01). There was a significant difference in the comparison of operated and contralateral forearm supination and elbow flexion muscle strength measurements at postoperative 3rd and 6th-month follow-up (p<0.01).Conclusion: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis into the anchors of lateral row combined rotator cuff repair provides an increase in strength of elbow flexion and forearm supination, while decreases pain. Level of Evidence: Level IV

Download Full-text

Longitudinal Long-term Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Follow-up After Single-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Clinical Superiority of Structural Tendon Integrity

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546517689873 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 45 (6) ◽

pp. 1283-1288 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

Philipp R. Heuberer ◽

Daniel Smolen ◽

Leo Pauzenberger ◽

Fabian Plachel ◽

Sylvia Salem ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rotator Cuff ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Full Thickness ◽

Constant Strength ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽

Cuff Repair

Background: The number of arthroscopic rotator cuff surgeries is consistently increasing. Although generally considered successful, the reported number of retears after rotator cuff repair is substantial. Short-term clinical outcomes are reported to be rarely impaired by tendon retears, whereas to our knowledge, there is no study documenting long-term clinical outcomes and tendon integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Purpose: To investigate longitudinal long-term repair integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Thirty patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with suture anchors for a full-tendon full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus or a partial-tendon full-thickness tear of the infraspinatus were included. Two and 10 years after initial arthroscopic surgery, tendon integrity was analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score and Constant score as well as subjective questions regarding satisfaction with the procedure and return to normal activity were used to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes. Results: At the early MRI follow-up, 42% of patients showed a full-thickness rerupture, while 25% had a partial rerupture, and 33% of tendons remained intact. The 10-year MRI follow-up (129 ± 11 months) showed 50% with a total rerupture, while the other half of the tendons were partially reruptured (25%) or intact (25%). The UCLA and Constant scores significantly improved from preoperatively (UCLA total: 50.6% ± 20.2%; Constant total: 44.7 ± 10.5 points) to 2 years (UCLA total: 91.4% ± 16.0% [ P < .001]; Constant total: 87.8 ± 15.3 points [ P < .001]) and remained significantly higher after 10 years (UCLA total: 89.7% ± 15.9% [ P < .001]; Constant total: 77.5 ± 15.6 points [ P < .001]). The Constant total score and Constant strength subscore, but not the UCLA score, were also significantly better at 10 years postoperatively in patients with intact tendons compared with patients with retorn tendons (Constant total: 89.0 ± 7.8 points vs 75.7 ± 14.1 points, respectively [ P = .034]; Constant strength: 18.0 ± 4.9 points vs 9.2 ± 5.2 points, respectively [ P = .006]). The majority of patients rated their satisfaction with the procedure as “excellent” (83.3%), and 87.5% returned to their normal daily activities. Conclusion: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed good clinical long-term results despite a high rate of retears. Nonetheless, intact tendons provided significantly superior clinical long-term outcomes, making the improvement of tendon healing and repair integrity important goals of future research efforts.

Download Full-text

Postoperative Outcomes of Single-Stage Versus Staged Bilateral Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients with Bilateral Rotator Cuff Tear: A Retrospective Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-241612/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Chen Wang ◽

Pu Yang ◽

Dongfang Zhang ◽

In-Ho Jeon ◽

Tengbo Yu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rotator Cuff ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Constant Score ◽

Single Stage ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Vas Score ◽

Ucla Score ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽

Cuff Repair

Abstract Background: In the present study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent single-stage or staged bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Methods: From March 2013 to May 2018, a retrospective review on all patients who underwent bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at our department was performed. There were 24 patients in the single-stage group and 27 patients in the staged group. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. The visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Constant-Murley (Constant) score, and the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder were evaluated for comparison between the two groups before and after the operation. Moreover, the hospitalization costs in the two groups were also recorded.Results: All 51 patients were available throughout follow-up. There was no significant difference in the VAS score (P=0.424), ASES score (P=0.325), UCLA score (P=0.170), and Constant score (P=0.275) between the single-stage group and the staged group before the operation. Postoperative clinical scores were significantly improved in both groups. The VAS score, ASES score, UCLA score, and Constant score were significantly different between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively (P<0.05). At 12, 18, and 24 months after the operation, the VAS score, UCLA score, Constant score, and ASES score were not significantly different between the two groups. At follow-up, the ROM of the shoulder was not significantly different between the two groups. Besides, there was a significant difference in hospitalization costs between the two groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the VAS score, UCLA score, Constant score, ASES score, and ROM between the first surgery and second surgery in the single-stage group postoperatively.Conclusion: Patients receiving single-stage or staged bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed similarly good clinical outcomes at follow-up. Moreover, good outcomes were observed on both sides of the single-stage group.

Download Full-text

Clinical outcome in patients with hand lesions associated with complex regional pain syndrome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow ◽

10.5397/cise.2021.00080 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Takaki Imai ◽

Masafumi Gotoh ◽

Keiji Fukuda ◽

Misa Ogino ◽

Hidehiro Nakamura ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rotator Cuff ◽

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Pain Syndrome ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽

Cuff Repair

Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)-related hand lesions are one of the complications following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with CRPS-related hand lesions following ARCR.Methods: Altogether, 103 patients with ARCR were included in this study (mean age, 63.6±8.2 years; 66 males and 37 females; follow-up period, preoperative to 12 months postoperative). Clinical assessment included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Constant score, 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score from preoperative to 12 months postoperatively. The patients were either assigned to the CRPS group or non-CRPS group depending on CRPS diagnosis until the final follow-up, and clinical outcomes were then compared between the groups.Results: Of 103 patients, 20 (19.4%) had CRPS-related hand lesions that developed entirely within 2 months postoperatively. Both groups showed significant improvement in JOA, UCLA, and Constant scores preoperatively to 12 months postoperatively (P<0.0001). Comparisons between the two groups were not significantly different, except for SF-36 “general health perception” (P<0.05) at 12 months postoperatively. At final follow-up, three patients had residual CRPS-related hand lesions with limited range of motion and finger edema.Conclusions: CRPS-related hand lesions developed in 19.4% of patients following ARCR. Shoulder or upper-limb function improved in most cases at 12 months, with satisfactory SF-36 patient-based evaluation results. Patients with residual CRPS-related hand lesions at the last follow-up require long-term follow-up.

Download Full-text

Platelet Rich Plasma in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Clinical and Radiological Results of A Prospective RCT Study at 10-Year Follow-Up

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967121s00245 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽

pp. 2325967121S0024

Author(s):

Pietro Randelli ◽

Carlo Alberto Stoppani ◽

Elisabetta Nocerino ◽

Alessandra Menon ◽

Riccardo Compagnoni

Keyword(s):

Surgical Treatment ◽

Rotator Cuff ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

External Rotation ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽

Cuff Repair

Objectives: Despite the technical advancement in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, inadequate healing or retear of the repaired rotator cuff frequently occurs. The use of biological factors in the surgical treatment has been proved to be effective to enhance tendon healing in the post-operative period. The aim of the study is to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without the addition of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) at 10-year follow-up. Methods: Of 53 patients recruited in the study, and randomly divided into two groups (PRP=26; control=27), 38 were re-evaluated at least 10 years after the index procedure. The clinical evaluation was carried out through: University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and isometric strength in abduction and external rotation. Musculoskeletal ultrasound had been used to evaluate the integrity of the repaired cuff. Results: A number of 38 (71%) patients (PRP=17; control=21) with a median age of 71 [64.75-76.50] years have been evaluated. Satisfaction at follow-up is high (90%), without statistically significant difference between the two groups. We report good and excellent clinical results in both groups (PRP vs control): CMS (81.62 [72.47-85.75] vs 77.97 [69.52-82.55] points), UCLA (34 [29.00-35.00] vs 33 [29.00-35.00] points), VAS (0.34 [0.00-1.85] vs 0.70 [0.00-2.45] cm), ASES (100.00 [94.17-100.00] vs 93.33 [68.33-100.00] points), SANE (100 [80-100] vs 80 [70-90] points), SST (12.00 [11.00-12.00] vs 12.00 [9.00-12.00] points),shoulder abduction strength (3.92 ± 2.30 vs 3.20 [1.72-4.65] kg), shoulder external rotation strength (5.31 ± 2.77 vs 4.36 ± 2.05 kg). It was not possible to find a statistically significant difference for the variables analysed, except for few subjective variables (ASES, SANE). On average, 37% of the operated patients had a re-rupture at the ultrasound examination, with no significant difference between the two groups (p=1.00). Compared with the previous radiological control at the 2-year follow-up, new retears occurred in 6% of the patients that received PRP treatment, whereas in the control group the percentage raises to 14% (p=0.61). Conclusions: The clinical and radiological outcomes at the 10-year follow-up show a substantial uniformity of results between the two groups. The clinical differences that had been observed at 2-year follow-up disappeared at long term. A reduction in retear rate is observed at US evaluation in the PRP group at 10 years follow-up and this trend needs to be further analyzed. Patients’ satisfaction is still high 10 years after surgical treatment, in both groups.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Does Infraspinatus Muscle Tear Affect Repair Integrity?

Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow ◽

10.5397/cise.2019.22.4.203 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 22 (4) ◽

pp. 203-209

Author(s):

Sungwook Choi ◽

Hyunchul Yang ◽

Hyunseong Kang ◽

Gyeong Min Kim

Keyword(s):

Rotator Cuff ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Rotator Cuff Tears ◽

Massive Rotator Cuff Tears ◽

Infraspinatus Muscle ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽

Cuff Repair

Background: Clinical outcomes and prognosis of large and massive rotator cuff tears are known to be unpredictable not only in degeneration of the rotator cuff, but also due to a high rate of retear.Methods: Totally, 81 patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from May 2008 to February 2016 were evaluated in our study. Clinical and functional evaluations were performed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, as well as full physical examination of the shoulder. All patients were confirmed to have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tendon healing at least 1 year postoperatively.Results: The average age at the time of surgery was 65 years (range, 47?78 years). The average duration of postoperative time in which a follow-up MRI was performed was 36.1 months (range, 12?110 months). Large tears were present in 48 cases (59.3%) and massive tears in 33 cases (40.7%). Overall, there were 33 retear cases (40.7%). All the average clinical outcome scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up (p<0.001), although repair integrity was not maintained. Compared to type A, types C, and D of the Collin’s classification showed significantly higher retear rates (p=0.036).Conclusions: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair yields improved clinical outcomes and a relatively high degree of patient satisfaction, despite the repair integrity not being maintained. Involvement of the subscapularis muscle or infraspinatus muscle had no effect on the retear rate.

Download Full-text

Does the Presence of Chondral Lesions Negatively Affect Patient-Determined Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120957993 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (10) ◽

pp. 232596712095799

Author(s):

Keith M. Baumgarten ◽

Peter S. Chang ◽

Will E. Schweinle

Keyword(s):

Rotator Cuff ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Activity Level ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Chondral Lesions ◽

Chondral Damage ◽

Outcome Scores ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽

Cuff Repair

Background: There are limited data available to guide patients to their prognosis when glenohumeral chondral lesions are found during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Hypothesis: The primary hypothesis was that patients with glenohumeral chondral lesions will have inferior outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair compared with patients without chondral lesions. The secondary hypothesis was that patients with concomitant chondral lesions will have more severe preoperative symptoms compared with those without chondral lesions. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2008 and 2012. We examined the effects of chondral lesions on patient-determined outcomes, which included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Shoulder Activity Level (SAL). Shoulders without chondral lesions were compared with shoulders with chondral lesions to determine whether differences in severity of preoperative symptoms as well as postoperative improvements were statistically significant. Results: A total of 281 shoulders were included from 273 patients, with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. In total, 90 shoulders (32%) had concomitant chondral lesions in the glenohumeral joint. The presence and degree of chondral damage were not associated with the severity of preoperative symptoms or the amount of improvement after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, as determined by patient outcome scores. Shoulders with bipolar chondral lesions had less postoperative improvement in their outcome scores compared with shoulders with unipolar lesions, with significant differences found in the SST ( P = .0005), the SANE ( P = .005), and the SAL ( P = .04). Regardless of this, the majority of shoulders with bipolar chondral lesions (80%-92%) had postoperative improvements that superseded the minimal clinically important difference of the ASES, WORC, and SANE. Conclusion: At a mean 3.7-year follow-up, the presence of chondral damage did not appear to negatively affect the improvement in patient-determined outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, improvement in outcomes was negatively affected by the presence of bipolar chondral lesions.

Download Full-text

Does the Use of Injectable Atelocollagen during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Improve Clinical and Structural Outcomes?

Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow ◽

10.5397/cise.2019.22.4.183 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 22 (4) ◽

pp. 183-189

Author(s):

In Bo Kim ◽

Eun Yeol Kim ◽

Kuk Pil Lim ◽

Ki Seong Heo

Keyword(s):

Rotator Cuff ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Rotator Cuff Tears ◽

Group I ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group Ii ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽

Cuff Repair

Background: Since the establishment of biological augmentation to improve the treatment of rotator cuff tears, it is imperative to explore newer techniques to reduce the retear rate and improve long-term shoulder function after rotator cuff repair. This study was undertaken to determine the consequences of a gel-type atelocollagen injection during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on clinical outcomes, and evaluate its effect on structural integrity.Methods: Between January 2014 and June 2015, 121 patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Of these, 61 patients were subjected to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in combination with an atelocollagen injection (group I), and 60 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone (group II). The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Korean Shoulder Society (KSS) scores were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 6 months postoperatively, to assess the integrity of the repair.Results: VAS scores were significantly lower in group I than in group II at 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery. KSS scores showed no significant difference between groups in the 24 months period of follow-up. No significant difference was obtained in the healing rate of the rotator cuff tear at 6 months postoperatively (p=0.529).Conclusions: Although a gel-type atelocollagen injection results in reduced pain in patients at 2 weeks after surgery, our study does not substantiate the administration of atelocollagen during rotator cuff repair to improve the clinical outcomes and healing of the rotator cuff.

Download Full-text

Effects of Anxiety and Depression Measured via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale on Early Pain and Range of Motion After Rotator Cuff Repair

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546520976574 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 49 (2) ◽

pp. 314-320

Author(s):

Joo Hyun Park ◽

Sung-Min Rhee ◽

Hyong Suk Kim ◽

Joo Han Oh

Keyword(s):

Rotator Cuff ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Preoperative Anxiety ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Psychological Status ◽

Anxiety And Depression ◽

Group B ◽

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽

Cuff Repair

Background: Preoperative anxiety and depression are independent predictors of clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, few studies have evaluated correlations between outcomes such as pain and range of motion (ROM) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and preoperative anxiety and depression. Purpose: To evaluate the effects of preoperative anxiety and depression, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), on early pain and ROM after rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 144 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to HADS scores: group A, those with a healthy psychological status (n = 103; anxiety ≤7 and depression ≤7), and group B, those with psychological distress (n = 41; anxiety ≥8 or depression ≥8). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale for pain (pVAS) and ROM at 3 and 6 months postoperatively and annually. Results: There were no significant preoperative differences in age, sex, tear size, pVAS scores, and ROM. However, at 3 months postoperatively, group A showed significantly lower mean pVAS scores (2.2 ± 1.3 vs 3.4 ± 1.8, respectively; P = .001) and significantly higher mean forward flexion (146.4°± 23.0° vs 124.1°± 28.2°, respectively; P < .001) than group B, as well as significantly higher mean levels of internal rotation at the back (T11.5 ± 2.8 vs L1.9 ± 2.5, respectively; P < .001) and significantly higher mean external rotation (42.4°± 15.9° vs 35.2°± 16.8°, respectively; P = .019). At 6 months postoperatively, the mean pVAS score was still significantly lower in group A than in group B (0.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.8 ± 2.1, respectively; P = .016), but other ROM measurements had no significant differences. There was also no significant difference in clinical and functional outcomes at the final follow-up. Conclusion: Anxiety and depression negatively affected clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Recovery from pain and of ROM after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair occurred more quickly in patients with a healthy psychological status. Therefore, assessments of preoperative psychological status should be emphasized to improve early clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Download Full-text