Pain Control After Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials With a Network Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 036354652097175
Author(s):  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Andrew B. Maye ◽  
Kamali Thompson ◽  
Utkarsh Anil ◽  
Sehar Reshad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Shoulder Arthroscopy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Oral Medications ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background: Shoulder arthroscopy is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures used to treat a variety of conditions, with >500,000 procedures performed each year. Purpose: To systematically review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pain control after shoulder arthroscopy in the acute postoperative setting and to ascertain the best available evidence in managing pain after shoulder arthroscopy to optimize patient outcomes. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they were RCTs evaluating interventions to reduce postoperative pain after shoulder arthroscopy: nerve blocks, nerve block adjuncts, subacromial injections, patient-controlled analgesia, oral medications, or other modalities. Meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were performed where appropriate. Results: Our study included 83 RCTs. Across 40 studies, peripheral nerve blocks were found to significantly reduce postoperative pain and opioid use, but there was no significant difference among the variable nerve blocks in the network meta-analysis. However, continuous interscalene block did have the highest P-score at most time points. Nerve block adjuncts were consistently shown across 18 studies to prolong the nerve block time and reduce pain. Preoperative administration was shown to significantly reduce postoperative pain scores ( P < .05). No benefit was found in any of the studies evaluating subacromial infusions. Conclusion: Continuous interscalene block resulted in the lowest pain levels at most time points, although this was not significantly different when compared with the other nerve blocks. Additionally, nerve block adjuncts may prolong the postoperative block time and improve pain control. There is promising evidence for some oral medications and newer modalities to control pain and reduce opioid use. However, we found no evidence to support the use of subacromial infusions or patient-controlled analgesia.

scholarly journals Suprascapular Nerve Blockade for Postoperative Pain Control After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596711881585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Kay ◽  
Muzammil Memon ◽  
Thomas Hu ◽  
Nicole Simunovic ◽  
Andrew Duong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Shoulder Arthroscopy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control ◽  
Nerve Blocks

Background: Regional nerve blocks are commonly used to manage postoperative pain after arthroscopic shoulder procedures. The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is commonly used; however, because of the reported side effects of ISB, the use of a suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been described as an alternative strategy with fewer reported side effects. Purpose: To examine the efficacy of SSNB for pain control after shoulder arthroscopy compared with ISB as well as anesthesia without a nerve block. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE) were searched on April 20, 2018, to systematically identify and screen the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis of standard mean differences (SMDs) was performed to pool the estimated effects of the nerve blocks. Results: The search identified 14 RCTs that included 1382 patients, with a mean age of 54 years (SD, 13 years). The mean follow-up time was 3 days (range, 24 hours to 6 weeks). Postoperative pain control was significantly more effective in the SSNB groups compared with the control groups within 1 hour (SMD, –0.76; 95% CI, –1.45 to –0.07; P = .03) and 4 to 6 hours (SMD, –0.81; 95% CI, –1.53 to –0.09; P = .03) postoperatively. However, pain control was significantly less effective in the SSNB groups compared with ISB within 1 hour (SMD, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.46; P = .004). No major complications were noted in the SSNB groups, and minor complications such as hoarseness and prolonged motor block were significantly less common for SSNB compared with ISB. Conclusion: Although not more efficacious than ISB in terms of pain control for patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy, SSNB provides significantly improved pain control in comparison with analgesia without a nerve block. Moreover, few major and minor complications are associated with SSNB reported across the literature.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of opioid use at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively by opioid naïve orthopaedic surgery patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-529
Author(s):  
Karen-leigh Edward, PhD, BN, GDipPsychology ◽  
Beata Stanley, BPharm ◽  
Lisa Collins, PhD ◽  
Amanda Norman, BA ◽  
Yvonne Bonomo, MBBS, FRACP, PhD, FAChAM ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Potential Factors ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Orthopedic Patients

Background and objective: There is evidence that opioid initiation post-surgery is contributing to the problem of chronic misuse and/or abuse of over the counter medications in the community, and that orthopedic patients may be particularly at risk. The aim of the systematic review with meta-analysis was to identify research that examined opioid use at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively by previously opioid naïve orthopedic surgery patients.Design, databases, and data treatment: A searched review with meta-analysis was undertaken. Eight databases were search. Meta-analyses conducted at all three time points (3 months, 6 months, and 12 months).Results: The search yielded 779 records, and after screening, 13 papers were included in meta-analysis. Results provide strong evidence that post-operative opioid use amongst the opioid naïve is a real effect (7 percent at 3 months, 4 percent at 6 months, and 2 percent at 12 months). A Z-test for overall effect revealed strong evidence that this proportion was nonzero for opioid use at 3, 6, and 12 months (p 0.001 for all time points). A small but significant proportion of opioid naïve patients who are prescribed opioids remain on these medications up to 12 months post-operatively.Conclusions: The nature of the studies included in the meta-analysis were varied, hence subanalyses regarding surgery type, characteristics of the patient group or other potential factors that might influence the progression to longer term opioid use after these surgeries could not be explored. Given this, further research in this area should explore such specific orthopedic subgroups.

scholarly journals The Role of Local Bupivacaine Irrigation in Postoperative Pain Control After Augmentation Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
Shan Shan Qiu ◽  
Marta Roque ◽  
Yi-Chieh Chen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Augmentation Mammoplasty ◽  
Mesh Terms

Background: The objective of this study is to analyze the efficacy of local bupivacaine irrigation after augmentation mammoplasty for the control of postoperative pain. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted including all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the irrigation of bupivacaine (±ketorolac) versus normal saline or no irrigation for pain control after breast augmentation. The primary outcome was postoperative pain measured by visual analog scale. The study protocol was established a priori according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration. A bibliographical search was conducted in September 2015 in the following Cochrane Library databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scielo. The strategy used for the search was ((augmentation AND (“mammoplasty”[MeSH Terms] OR “mammoplasty”)) OR ((“breast”[MeSH Terms] OR “breast”) AND augmentation)) AND ((“pain, postoperative”[MeSH Terms])). Results: Four RCTs with a total of 264 participants were included. Two trials compared bupivacaine alone versus placebo (normal saline or no irrigation) and 3 trials compared bupivacaine plus ketorolac versus placebo. The combined irrigation of bupivacaine and ketorolac showed a clinically significant reduction of pain in the first postoperative hour and on postoperative day 5. The irrigation with bupivacaine compared with placebo significantly reduced pain assessed on postoperative day 4. Conclusion: The irrigation of bupivacaine with or without ketorolac was associated with a reduction of postoperative pain compared with control groups for the first 5 postoperative days. Due to the few number of trials included, these results should be correlated further clinically.

Pain Management After Hip Arthroscopy: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (13) ◽  
pp. 3288-3298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason J. Shin ◽  
Chris L. McCrum ◽  
Craig S. Mauro ◽  
Dharmesh Vyas
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Lumbar Plexus ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Fascia Iliaca Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Hip arthroscopy is often associated with significant postoperative pain and opioid-associated side effects. Effective pain management after hip arthroscopy improves patient recovery and satisfaction and decreases opioid-related complications. Purpose: To collect, examine, and provide a comprehensive review of the available evidence from randomized controlled trials and comparative studies on pain control after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature for postoperative pain control after hip arthroscopy was performed using electronic databases. Only comparative clinical studies with level 1 to 3 evidence comparing a method of postoperative pain control with other modalities or placebo were included in this review. Case series and studies without a comparative cohort were excluded. Results: Several methods of pain management have been described for hip arthroscopy. A total of 14 studies met our inclusion criteria: 3 on femoral nerve block, 3 on lumbar plexus block, 3 on fascia iliaca block, 4 on intra-articular injections, 2 on soft tissue surrounding surgical site injection, and 2 on celecoxib (4 studies compared 2 or more methods of analgesia). The heterogeneity of the studies did not allow for pooling of data. Single-injection femoral nerve blocks and lumbar plexus blocks provided improved analgesia, but increased fall rates were observed. Fascia iliaca blocks do not provide adequate pain relief when compared with surgical site infiltration with local anesthetic and are associated with increased risk of cutaneous nerve deficits. Patients receiving lumbar plexus block experienced significantly decreased pain compared with fascia iliaca block. Portal site and periacetabular injections provide superior analgesia compared with intra-articular injections alone. Preoperative oral celecoxib, compared with placebo, resulted in earlier time to discharge and provided significant pain relief up to 24 hours. Conclusion: Perioperative nerve blocks provide effective pain management after hip arthroscopy but must be used with caution to decrease risk of falls. Intra-articular and portal site injections with local anesthetics and preoperative celecoxib can decrease opioid consumption. There is a lack of high-quality evidence on this topic, and further research is needed to determine the best approach to manage postoperative pain and optimize patient satisfaction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document