Achievement of Meaningful Clinical Outcomes Is Unaffected by Capsulotomy Type During Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip (MASH) Study Group

Background: Capsule management has emerged as an important topic in the field of hip arthroscopy. The 2 most popular techniques are interportal capsulotomy and T-type capsulotomy, but few studies have compared outcomes between these 2 techniques. Purpose: To compare 2-year (±2 months) patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who underwent interportal versus T-type capsulotomy during arthroscopic labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of a large multicenter registry of patients undergoing arthroscopic hip preservation surgery for FAIS was performed. Data from 9 surgeons across 9 sites between January 2014 and February 2018 were included in the study. Baseline demographic data, preoperative PROs, and minimum 2-year postoperative PROs including Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS–Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score, and International Hip Outcome Tool–12 (iHOT-12) were recorded. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether interportal or T-type capsulotomy was performed according to the senior surgeon’s preference and training, and all capsulotomies were then routinely repaired. The 2 groups were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID), Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) was compared for the HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and iHOT-12 between the 2 groups. Results: The final analysis included 658 of 1483 eligible patients with a mean ± SD age of 32.6 ± 11.6 years and BMI of 24.0 ± 3.7; of these, 329 patients were treated via interportal capsulotomy, and 329 patients were treated via T-type capsulotomy. Female patients comprised 66.3% of the study population. Capsulotomy type was not a predictor of 2-year postoperative PROs on multivariate linear regression analysis when adjusted for covariates. Chi-square analysis showed no statistical difference in achievement of MCID, PASS, and SCB between the interportal and T-type groups for HOS-ADL (80.3%, 75.8%, 52.7% and 77.1%, 71.7%, 53.6%, respectively; P > .01 for all), HOS-SS (83.6%, 72.5%, 51.5% and 81.7%, 68.4%, 49.2%, respectively; P > .01 for all), and iHOT-12 (87.5%, 72.0%, 50.5% and 80.0%, 64.7%, 45.6%, respectively; P > .01 for all). Conclusion: Arthroscopic management of FAIS resulted in significant clinical improvement that was independent of capsulotomy type when the capsulotomy included repair.

Download Full-text

Preoperative Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967119860079 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (7) ◽

pp. 232596711986007 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽

Edward C. Beck ◽

Reagan Chapman ◽

Jorge Chahla ◽

Kelechi Okoroha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Linear Regression Analysis ◽

Arthroscopic Surgery ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Poor Correlation ◽

Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Floor Effects

Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is being increasingly evaluated for use in orthopaedic surgery. The performance of the PROMIS in patients undergoing hip preservation surgery is unknown. Purpose: To investigate the psychometric performance of the PROMIS compared with legacy patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients indicated for hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery between January and October 2018 for the treatment of FAIS were collected and analyzed. Baseline data, including preoperative PROM scores and demographics, were recorded. PROMs included the PROMIS Physical Function (PF), the Hip Outcome Score (HOS), the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the International Hip Outcome Tool–12 (iHOT-12), and the Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12). Pearson and Spearman coefficient analyses were used to identify correlations between continuous and noncontinuous variables, respectively. Correlation was defined as excellent (>0.80), very good (0.71-0.80), good (0.61-0.70), fair (0.41-0.60), or poor (0.21-0.40). A multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify preoperative predictors of having higher preoperative PROMIS scores. Results: A total of 197 patients with a mean age and body mass index (BMI) of 32.8 ± 12.6 years and 25.7 ± 5.6 kg/m2, respectively, were included in the final analysis. There were no ceiling or floor effects for the PROMIS PF score observed in the study group. With regard to hip-specific measures, PROMIS PF scores demonstrated excellent correlation with HOS–Activities of Daily Living ( r = 0.801; P < .001) scores, very good correlation with mHHS ( r = 0.721; P < .001) and iHOT-12 ( r = 0.722; P < .001) scores, and good correlation with HOS–Sports Specific ( r = 0.675; P < .001) scores. With regard to general health–related quality of life (HRQoL) measures, PROMIS PF scores demonstrated very good correlation with VR-12 mental ( r = 0.721; P < .001) scores, good correlation with VR-12 physical ( r = 0.618; P < .001) scores, and poor correlation with visual analog scale for pain ( r = –0.365; P < .001) scores. Patients who reported being physically active were more likely to have a higher preoperative PROMIS score (β = 3.216; P = .004). Lower PROMIS scores were found in patients with a higher BMI (β = –0.236; P = .005) and in female patients (β = –2.608; P = .014). Conclusion: In patients with FAIS, the preoperative PROMIS PF scores demonstrated excellent to good correlation with legacy hip-specific instruments as well as with HRQoL measures. No ceiling or floor effects were identified. Notably, of the hip-specific PROMs administered, the PROMIS PF demonstrated the weakest correlation with the HOS–Sports Specific subscale. Physical activity, BMI, and sex were predictors of preoperative PROMIS scores in our patient population.

Download Full-text

High Rate of Return to Yoga for Athletes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach ◽

10.1177/1941738118757406 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 10 (5) ◽

pp. 434-440 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Rachel M. Frank ◽

Gift Ukwuani ◽

Bradley Allison ◽

Ian Clapp ◽

Shane J. Nho

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Female Athletes ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

High Rate ◽

Rate Of Return ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is most commonly diagnosed in patients who perform activities that require repetitive hip flexion and rotational loading. Yoga is an activity growing in popularity that involves these motions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients’ ability to return to yoga after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Hypothesis: There would be a high rate of return to yoga after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Retrospective analysis. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Methods: Consecutive patients with FAIS who had identified themselves as participating in yoga and had undergone hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAIS between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed. Demographic data were collected and assessed for all patients, as well as preoperative physical examination, imaging, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports-Specific (HOS-SS) subscales, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Postoperatively, examination and PRO data were collected at a minimum 1 year after surgery, including a yoga-specific questionnaire. Results: A total of 42 patients (90% female; mean age, 35 ± 9 years; mean body mass index, 23.1 ± 3.2 kg/m2) were included. Thirty patients (71%) had to discontinue their yoga routine preoperatively because of hip-related symptoms at a mean 9.5 ± 8.2 months before surgery. After surgery, 39 patients (93%) were able to return to yoga at a mean 5.3 ± 2.2 months after surgery. Two of the 3 patients who did not return to yoga noted loss of interest as their reason for stopping, while 1 patient was unable to return because of persistent hip pain. Nineteen patients (45%) returned to a higher level of yoga practice, 17 patients (40%) returned to the same level, and 3 patients (7%) returned to a lower level. There was no difference in the number of hours spent practicing yoga per week pre- and postoperatively (2.7 ± 1.9 vs 2.5 ± 1.3 hours; P = 0.44). All patients demonstrated significant improvement in all PROs as well as pain scores after surgery (HOS-ADL, 67.4 ± 18.3 to 93.1 ± 6.9 [ P < 0.001]; HOS-SS, 45.6 ± 24.7 to 81.5 ± 18.8 [ P < 0.001]; mHHS, 62.3 ± 11.3 to 86.8 ± 12.3 [ P < 0.0001]; VAS pain, 6.3 ± 2.2 to 0.90 ± 1.1 [ P < 0.001]). Conclusion: Patients participating in yoga return to yoga 93% of the time and at a mean 5.3 ± 2.2 months after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Clinical Relevance: Information regarding surgical outcomes is critical in counseling patients, particularly female athletes, on their expectations with respect to returning to yoga after hip arthroscopy for FAIS.

Download Full-text

Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Severe Femoral Torsion

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/23259671211034588 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (10) ◽

pp. 232596712110345

Author(s):

Steven F. DeFroda ◽

Thomas D. Alter ◽

Blake M. Bodendorfer ◽

Alexander C. Newhouse ◽

Felipe S. Bessa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Femoral Torsion ◽

Outcome Score ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Outcome Improvement ◽

Clinically Significant

Background: The influence of femoral torsion on clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has not been well-studied. Purpose: To quantify femoral torsion in FAIS patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explore the relationship between femoral torsion and clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and August 2018 and had 2-year follow-up and preoperative MRI scans containing transcondylar slices of the knee. Participants were categorized as having severe retrotorsion (SR; <0°), normal torsion (NT; 0°-25°), and severe antetorsion (SA; >25°) as measured on MRI. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Achievement of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were analyzed among cohorts. Results: Included were 183 patients (SR, n = 13; NT, n = 154; SA, n = 16) with a mean age, body mass index, and femoral torsion of 30.6 ± 12.1 years, 24.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2, and 12.55° ± 9.58°, respectively. The mean torsion was –4.5° ± 2.6° for the SR, 12.1° ± 6.8° for the NT, and 31.0° ± 3.6° for the SA group. There were between-group differences in the proportion of patients who achieved PASS and SCB on the iHOT-12, pain VAS, and any PRO ( P < .05). Post hoc analysis indicated that the SA group achieved lower rates of PASS and SCB on the iHOT-12 and pain VAS, and lower rates of PASS on any PRO versus the SR group ( P < .05); the SR group achieved higher rates of PASS and SCB on pain VAS scores versus the NT group ( P = .003). Conclusion: The orientation and severity of femoral torsion during hip arthroscopy influenced the propensity for clinically significant outcome improvement. Specifically, patients with femoral retrotorsion and femoral antetorsion had higher and lower rates of clinically significant outcome improvement, respectively.

Download Full-text

Return to Pilates following hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery ◽

10.1093/jhps/hnz053 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Timothy C Keating ◽

Jorge Chahla ◽

Edward C Beck ◽

Andrew J Riff ◽

Ian M Clapp ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Exercise Program ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

The Body ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Hip Function

Abstract The Pilates Method is a common exercise program which focuses on strength, flexibility and control of the body. While the effects of Pilates have been shown to benefit, limited research has investigated its effect on patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). As such, the purpose of this study was to examine the rate of return to Pilates following hip arthroscopy after undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS. The study evaluated consecutive patients who identified themselves as participating in Pilates and had undergone hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAIS by a single fellowship-trained surgeon between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed. Demographic data, baseline physical examination, imaging, pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores at a minimum of 2-years following surgery as well as a Pilates-specific questionnaire were assessed for all patients. A total of 25 patients (all female) with mean age 38 ± 11 years were identified. Preoperatively, 12 patients had discontinued Pilates due to activity-related hip complaints, 11 patients had scaled back involvement, and 2 patients maintained their baseline routine. Postoperatively, 23 of 25 patients (92%) returned to Pilates at an average of 7.7 ± 4.2 months following surgery (range, 3–14 months). Postoperatively, 96% returned to Pilates at the same level or better than preinjury. Preinjury and postoperative involvement in Pilates were comparable (2.2 h v. 1.8 h per week, P = 0.8). Loss of interest and fear of reinjury were the most common reasons for reduced Pilates involvement. All patients had significant improvements in HOS-ADL (pre 56.52 ± 21.6; post 86.1 ± 18.8; P < 0.001), HOS-SS (30.1 ± 20.0, 63.8 ± 34.8; P < 0.001), mHHS scores (57.6 ± 12.8; 79.2 ± 19.6; P < 0.001), and VAS pain (68.8 ± 15.4; 21.4 ± 26.5; P < 0.001). In conclusion, arthroscopic treatment of FAIS in Pilates participants resulted in significant improvements in hip function and predictably high rates of satisfaction.

Download Full-text

Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 10-Year Follow-up: The Timing of Surgery Is Crucial

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120985140 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. 232596712098514

Author(s):

Alexander Zimmerer ◽

Viktor Janz ◽

Christian Sobau ◽

Georgi I. Wassilew ◽

Wolfgang Miehlke

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Independent Predictor ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Arthroscopic Treatment ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Symptom Duration ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported

Background: Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has become a common procedure. However, meaningful long-term clinical outcomes have not been defined. Purpose: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at a minimum 10-year follow-up in patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment for FAIS and identify preoperative predictors for achievement of the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment for FAIS between 2007 and 2009 with a minimum 10-year follow-up was analyzed. Patient data included patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, and the pre- and postoperative mHHS and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score. Paired t tests were used to compare the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The MCID was determined by calculating half of the standard deviation, and SCB and PASS were calculated by the anchor method. Correlation and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors for the achievement of the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Results: A total of 44 patients (27 men, 17 women) were included. The mean age and body mass index were 42.2 years (range, 16-67 years) and 22.3 kg/m2 (range, 16.76-29.78 kg/m2), respectively. The MCID, absolute SCB, net change SCB, and PASS of the mHHS were calculated to be 19.6, 90.1, 31.5, and 84.4 points, respectively. Preoperative symptom duration was identified as an independent predictor for the achievement of meaningful clinical outcomes. The median symptom durations for patients who achieved the MCID, absolute SCB, net change SCB, and PASS were 11.7, 9.1, 9.0, and 10.8 months, respectively. The median symptom duration for patients who did not achieve the MCID, absolute SCB, net change SCB, and PASS were 15.8, 17.4, 17.3, and 18.4 months, respectively. No other statistically significant correlations were found. Conclusion: The preoperative duration of symptoms was identified as an independent predictor for achievement of the MCID, SCB, and PASS. These findings can be helpful in accelerating the transition to surgical treatment of FAIS.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of outcome reporting trends for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome- a systematic review

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics ◽

10.1186/s40634-021-00351-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Ida Lindman ◽

Sarantos Nikou ◽

Axel Öhlin ◽

Eric Hamrin Senorski ◽

Olufemi Ayeni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Surgical Treatment ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Arthroscopic Surgery ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Continuous Increase ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the trends in the literature regarding surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and to present which patient-reported outcome-measures (PROMs) and surgical approaches are included. Methods This systematic review was conducted with the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase, covering studies from 1999 to 2020. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies with surgical treatment for FAIS, the use of PROMs as evaluation tool and studies in English. Exclusion criteria were studies with patients < 18 years, cohorts with < 8 patients, studies with primarily purpose to evaluate other diagnoses than FAIS and studies with radiographs as only outcomes without using PROMs. Data extracted were author, year, surgical intervention, type of study, level of evidence, demographics of included patients, and PROMs. Results The initial search yielded 2,559 studies, of which 196 were included. There was an increase of 2,043% in the number of studies from the first to the last five years (2004–2008)—(2016–2020). There were 135 (69%) retrospective, 55 (28%) prospective and 6 (3%) Randomized Controlled Trials. Level of evidence ranged from I-IV where Level III was most common (44%). More than half of the studies (58%) originated from USA. Arthroscopic surgery was the most common surgical treatment (85%). Mean follow-up was 27.0 months (± 17 SD), (range 1.5–120 months). Between 1–10 PROMs were included, and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was most commonly used (61%). Conclusion There has been a continuous increase in the number of published studies regarding FAIS with the majority evaluating arthroscopic surgery. The mHHS remains being the most commonly used PROM.

Download Full-text

Return to Sport and Athletic Function in an Active Population After Primary Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction of the Hip

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967119900767 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 232596711990076 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

David R. Maldonado ◽

Sarah L. Chen ◽

Mitchell J. Yelton ◽

Philip J. Rosinsky ◽

Rafael Walker-Santiago ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Return To Sport ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Rate Of Return ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Labral Tears ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Mean

Background: Labral reconstruction has been advocated as an alternative to debridement for the treatment of irreparable labral tears, showing favorable short-term results. However, literature is scarce regarding outcomes and return to sport in the nonelite athletic population. Purpose: To report minimum 1-year clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sport in athletic patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and irreparable labral tears. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed for patients who underwent an arthroscopic labral reconstruction between August 2012 and December 2017. Patients were included if they identified as an athlete (high school, college, recreational, or amateur); had follow-up on the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs): modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS); and completed a return-to-sport survey at 1 year postoperatively. Patients were excluded if they underwent any previous ipsilateral hip surgery, had dysplasia, or had prior hip conditions. The proportions of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for mHHS and HOS-SSS were calculated. Statistical significance was set at P = .05. Results: There were 32 (14 females) athletes who underwent primary arthroscopic labral reconstruction during the study period. The mean age and body mass index of the group were 40.3 years (range, 15.5-58.7 years) and 27.9 kg/m2 (range, 19.6-40.1 kg/m2), respectively. The mean follow-up was 26.4 months (range, 12-64.2 months). All patients demonstrated significant improvement in mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, and VAS ( P < .001) at latest follow-up. Additionally, 84.4% achieved MCID and 81.3% achieved PASS for mHHS, and 87.5% achieved MCID and 75% achieved PASS for HOS-SSS. VAS pain scores decreased from 4.4 to 1.8, and the satisfaction with surgery was 7.9 out of 10. The rate of return to sport was 78%. Conclusion: At minimum 1-year follow-up, primary arthroscopic labral reconstruction, in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and irreparable labral tears, was associated with significant improvement in PROs in athletic populations. Return to sport within 1 year of surgery was 78%.

Download Full-text

Patients with a Hypoplastic Labrum Achieve Similar Outcomes After Primary Labral Repair in the Treatment of Femoracetablular Impingement Syndrome Compared to Patients with a Normal Labrum

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120s00436 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽

pp. 2325967120S0043

Author(s):

Justin Drager ◽

Alexander Newhouse ◽

Jorge Chahla ◽

Shane Nho ◽

Jonathan Rasio

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Labral Repair ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Score Improvement ◽

Center Edge ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Outcome Tool ◽

Modified Harris Hip Score

Objectives: A preoperative or intraoperative finding of an acetabular labrum width of <4mm is often cited as an indication for performing primary labral reconstruction over repair in the surgical correction of Femoracetablular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS). The purpose of this study is to compare patient reported clinical outcomes and rates of reaching Minimum Clinical Important Differences (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) between patients with a hypoplastic labrum compared to those with a normal labrum width at a minimum 1 year from arthroscopic treatment of FAIS. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between November 2015 and July 2018 for the treatment of FAIS were analyzed. Baseline demographic data, preoperative, and minimum 1 year post-operative clinical outcomes including Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), international Hip Outcome Tool 12 questions (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction were recorded. The labrum size was documented by the senior surgeon for all patients using the tip of an arthroscopic probe measuring 4mm. Labrum hypoplasia was defined as a labrum width at the 12 o’clock position of <4mm and normal labrum was defined as labrum width between 4 and 7mm. Patients with hypoplastic labrum were matched 1:1 by age and BMI to patients with normal labrum width. All patients underwent arthroscopic labral repair in addition to impingement resection and capsular repair. The groups were further compared after separating by acetabular coverage, in which a Lateral Center Edge Angle of 18-24.9 was considered borderline dysplastic and 25-40 was considered normal. Rates of achieving MCID calculated using a distribution-based method and PASS calculated using an anchor-based method. Results: A total of 360 patients were included in the study with 180 in each of the normal and hypoplastic groups. There was no significant differences seen in 1-year post operative outcome scores or score improvement between the two groups. When examining only borderline dysplastic patients there were no significant differences in outcomes between normal and hypoplastic labrum patients. In the subset with a normal LCEA only post-operative VAS satisfaction (85.5 ± 19.3 vs 78.2 ± 27.4; p=0.050) was significantly higher in the normal labrum patients compared to hypoplastic labrum. Patients with hypoplastic labrum achieved MCID and PASS at the same rate as patients with normal labrum across all outcome measures. Conclusions: Patients with an intraoperative finding of labral hypoplasia achieve 1-year meaningful clinical outcome at the same rate as those with normal labral width following arthroscopic labral repair. These results bring into question the need for primary labral reconstruction in patients with labral hypoplasia with a normal or borderline dysplastic acetabulum.

Download Full-text

Arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in adolescents—5-year follow-up

Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery ◽

10.1093/jhps/hnab051 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Søren Winge ◽

Sophie Winge ◽

Otto Kraemer ◽

Christian Dippmann ◽

Per Hölmich

Keyword(s):

Physical Function ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Periacetabular Osteotomy ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Labral Repair ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Center Edge ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

ABSTRACT To report the minimum 5-year outcome after hip arthroscopy with labral repair in adolescents. From 2011 to 2014, 29 consecutive patients with a mean age 16.3 years (range 12.7–19.8 years) underwent hip arthroscopy treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) were used preoperatively and at follow-up (FU). Percentage of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for mHHS and HAGOS were determined. Mean FU was 6.7 years (range 5–9.6 years), and a 100% FU was accomplished. Significant improvements were seen for all PROMs at FU in patients not having a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) with VAS pain score improving from mean 62 to 9, mHHS from 58 to 94 and HAGOS improved in all subgroups. For mHHS, SCB changes were achieved by 76% and MCID by 76% of the patients. Percentage of patients achieving MCID for HAGOS subgroups were 81% for pain, 67% for symptoms, 76% for physical function in daily living, 76% for physical function in sport and recreation, 81% for participation in physical activities and 81% for hip-related quality of life. Two patients had revision hip arthroscopy. PAO was later performed in three patients. The risk of further surgery with center edge (CE) bony edge (CEB) <30° was 42% and 0% with CEB ≥30°. Adolescents having hip arthroscopy with labral repair and resection of cam and pincer morphology achieve significant improvements at mean 6.7 years of FU. CEB < 30° increases the risk of further surgery.

Download Full-text

Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546520902736 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 48 (4) ◽

pp. 901-907 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽

Edward C. Beck ◽

Kyle N. Kunze ◽

Jorge Chahla ◽

Jonathan Rasio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Case Series ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Arthroscopic Treatment ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Outcome Score ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported

Background: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) have gained prominence as important variables in the orthopaedic outcomes literature. In hip preservation surgery, much attention has been given to defining early clinically meaningful outcome; however, it is unknown what represents meaningful patient-reported outcome improvement in the medium to long term. Purpose: (1) To define MCID, PASS, and SCB at a minimum 5 years after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and (2) to evaluate the time-dependent nature of MCID, PASS, and SCB. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and March 2014 were included. Clinical and demographic data were collected in an institutional hip preservation registry. MCID, PASS, and SCB were calculated for each outcome score including the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score–Sport-Specific subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) at 1, 2, and 5 years. MCID was calculated by use of a distribution-based method, whereas PASS and SCB were calculated by use of an anchor method. Results: The study included 283 patients with a mean ± SD age of 34.2 ± 11.9 years. The mean changes in 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year scores, respectively, required to achieve MCID were as follows: HOS-ADL (8.8, 9.7, 10.2); HOS-SS (13.9, 14.3, 15.2); mHHS (6.9, 9.2, 11.4); and iHOT-12 (15.1, 13.9, 15.1). The threshold scores for achieving PASS were as follows: HOS-ADL (89.7, 88.2, 99.2); HOS-SS (72.2, 76.4, 80.9); mHHS (84.8, 83.3, 83.6); and iHOT-12 (69.1, 72.2, 74.3). Last, the threshold scores for achieving SCB scores were as follows: HOS-ADL (89.7, 91.9, 94.6); HOS-SS (78.1, 77.9, 85.8); mHHS (86.9, 85.8, 94.4); and iHOT-12 (72.6, 76.8, 87.5). More patients achieved MCID, SCB, and PASS at 2-year compared with 1-year follow-up; however, by 5 years, fewer patients had achieved clinically meaningful outcome (minimum 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-up, respectively: MCID, 82.6%, 87.3%, 79.3%; PASS, 67.6%, 74.9%, 67.5%; SCB, 62.3%, 67.2%, 56.6%). Conclusion: The greatest proportion of patients achieved MCID, PASS, and SCB at 2-year follow-up after arthroscopic treatment of FAIS compared with 1- and 5-year time points. Improvements were maintained out to 5-year follow-up, although the proportion of patients achieving clinical significance was slightly decreased.

Download Full-text