Radiographic Methods Are as Accurate as Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Graft Sizing Before Lateral Meniscal Transplantation: Letter to the Editor

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. NP59-NP60
Author(s):  
Kaywan Izadpanah ◽  
Matthias Feucht ◽  
Moritz Mayr ◽  
Sebastian Ferdinand Bendak
2018 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 1485-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bock ◽  
Louisa Traser ◽  
Ali Caglar Özen ◽  
Michael Burdumy ◽  
Bernhard Richter ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 1082-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor L. Carter ◽  
Virginia F. J. Newcombe ◽  
Robert C. Hawkes ◽  
Jonathan P. Coles

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (14) ◽  
pp. 3534-3540
Author(s):  
Luiz Felipe Ambra ◽  
Camila Cohen Kaleka ◽  
Pedro Debieux ◽  
Julio Cesar Almeida ◽  
Nehal Shah ◽  
...  

Background: Accurate allograft matching is deemed critical for meniscal transplantation; thus, precise measurements are essential to correctly calculate meniscal size. Several methods for meniscal sizing have been described, but there remains a discussion on which is the most accurate for the lateral meniscus. Purpose: To compare the accuracy of radiographic, anthropometric, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods of determining width and length of the lateral meniscus with actual dimensions after anatomic dissection. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees without any evidence of meniscal or ligamentous injury were primarily imaged using radiography and MRI and subsequently underwent dissection to assess the anatomic size of each meniscus. Four methods were used to predict the size of the lateral menisci: anthropometric, radiographic (Pollard and Yoon), and MRI. Absolute differences in length and width between actual and predicted sizes were determined. Results: The anatomic lateral meniscal width and length were 33.01 ± 4.25 mm (mean ± SD; range, 24.84-40.18 mm) and 31.41 ± 5.06 mm (range, 25.2-40.05 mm), respectively. Regarding width, the anthropometric method demonstrated an absolute difference from anatomic measurement significantly greater when compared with the Pollard technique and MRI ( P = .002). Regarding length, the Pollard method presented an absolute difference significantly greater than all other techniques ( P = .003). In terms of the ability to measure width and length, MRI accurately predicted meniscal size within 10% of the anatomic size in 65% of measurements, the Yoon method in 54%, and the Pollard method in 20% ( P = .01). Radiographs tended to overestimate the true size of the lateral meniscus, while the anthropometric technique overestimated width in all specimens. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that MRI and the Yoon radiographic method are comparable in terms of accuracy for graft sizing before lateral meniscal transplantation. While MRI is useful, a contralateral MRI is required, which makes the Yoon radiographic method recommended given the ease and cost advantage. The original Pollard technique and the anthropometric method are not recommended. Clinical Relevance: Over- and undersizing of meniscal transplants has been implicated in graft failure. Therefore, increasing the reliability of preoperative meniscal measurements is deemed important for the success of meniscal allograft transplantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document