scholarly journals Graft Survivorship After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on Tibial Slope

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110492
Author(s):  
Clemens Gwinner ◽  
Milan Janosec ◽  
Guido Wierer ◽  
Michael Wagner ◽  
Andreas Weiler
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Slope ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Group A ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Group B

Background: Increased tibial slope (TS) is believed to be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Increased TS may also promote graft insufficiency after ACL reconstruction. Purpose: To delineate the relationship between TS and single as well as multiple graft insufficiencies after ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence 3. Methods: We retrospectively identified 519 patients who had sustained ACL graft insufficiency after primary or revision ACL reconstruction (1 graft insufficiency, group A; 2 graft insufficiencies, group B; and ≥3 graft insufficiencies, group C). In addition, a subgroup analysis was conducted in 63 patients who received all surgical interventions by 2 specialized high-volume, single-center ACL surgeons. TS was measured by an observer with >10 years of training using lateral knee radiographs, and intrarater reliability was performed. Multiple logistic and univariate Cox regression was used to assess the contribution of covariates (TS, age, sex, and bilateral ACL injury) on repeated graft insufficiency and graft survival. Results: The study included 347 patients, 119 female and 228 male, who were 24 ± 9 years of age at their first surgery (group A, n = 260; group B, n = 62; group C, n = 25). Mean TS was 9.8°± 2.7° (range, 3°-18°). TS produced the highest adjusted odds ratio (1.73) of all covariates for repeated graft insufficiency. A significant correlation was found between TS and the number of graft insufficiencies ( r = 0.48; P < .0001). TS was significantly lower in group A (9.0°± 2.3°) compared with group B (12.1°± 2.5°; P < .0001) and group C (12.0°± 2.6°; P < .0001). A significant correlation was seen between the TS and age at index ACL tear ( r = −0.12; P = .02) as well as time to graft insufficiency ( r = −0.12; P = .02). A TS ≥12° had an odds ratio of 11.6 for repeated ACL graft insufficiency. Conclusion: The current results indicate that patients with a markedly increased TS were at risk of early and repeated graft insufficiency after ACL reconstruction. Because the TS is rarely accounted for in primary and revision ACLR, isolated soft tissue procedures only incompletely address recurrent graft insufficiency in this subset of patients.

scholarly journals High Tibial Valgus Osteotomy and Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Which is the most appropriate surgical technique?

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (12_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0023
Author(s):  
Matías Costa Paz ◽  
Juan José Deré ◽  
Carlos Heraldo Yacuzzi
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Slope ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Peroneal Nerve Injury ◽  
Group A ◽  
High Tibial Valgus Osteotomy ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Group B ◽  
Tibial Valgus

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate advantages of close vs. open HTO of a group of patients who underwent a one-stage combined operation for chronic ACL rupture and early medial compartment arthritis. Material and Methods: We retrospective evaluated two series of patients operated on for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction combined with high tibial valgus osteotomy (HTO) for chronic anterior knee instability associated with medial tibio femoral osteoarthritis. Close HTO using rigid plate fixation and ACL reconstruction with bone patellar tendon bone graft was performed in Group A (7 patients). An open HTO using Puddu plate and ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft was performed in Group B (9 patients). The mean age in Group A was 41 years old with an average varus of 8 degrees. Mean age in Group B was 42 years old and with 4 degrees of varus. Lysholm Score, HSS and Radiographs were performed. Results: Group A obtained a mean Lysholm score of 94, mean HSS of 91. Group B showed a mean Lysholm score of 83, mean HSS of 87. The mean follow-up was 5 years in both groups. In all cases osteotomies consolidated. Discussion: Technically we found that open HTO with hamstrings had several advantages such as lower risk of peroneal nerve injury, use of one incision, no problems as regards graft length, possibility of fixing the graft in the proximal tibia, maintenance of tibial slope and preservation of bone stock. The Open HTO need of osseous graft, may produce patella baja and the risk of nonunion is higher. This technique is indicated for relaxed medial collateral ligament. As regards the Close HTO there may be possibilities of a peroneal nerve injury, it may decrease the tibial slope, patellar ascent, loss of bone, the need to disrupt either the fibula or proximal tibio-fibular joint and may generate instability in the posterolateral corner and the screws could compromise the tunnels path. The advantages are provision of bone to bone contact with excellent union rates and the potential for full early weight-bearing. Conclusion: In spite of these issues, both procedures relieved pain and restored knee stability and the choice will depend on each particular case.

scholarly journals Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in National Basketball Association Players

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596712098164
Author(s):  
Steven F. DeFroda ◽  
Devan D. Patel ◽  
John Milner ◽  
Daniel S. Yang ◽  
Brett D. Owens
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Case Series ◽  
National Basketball Association ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in National Basketball Association (NBA) players can have a significant impact on player longevity and performance. Current literature reports a high rate of return to play, but there are limited data on performance after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine return to play and player performance in the first and second seasons after ACLR in NBA players. We hypothesized that players would return at a high rate. However, we also hypothesized that performance in the first season after ACLR would be worse as compared with the preinjury performance, with a return to baseline by postoperative year 2. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: An online database of NBA athlete injuries between 2010 and 2019 was queried using the term ACL reconstruction. For the included players, the following data were recorded: name; age at injury; position; height, weight, and body mass index; handedness; NBA experience; dates of injury, surgery, and return; knee affected; and postoperative seasons played. Regular season statistics for 1 preinjury season and 2 postoperative seasons were compiled and included games started and played, minutes played, and player efficiency rating. Kaplan-Meier survivorship plots were computed for athlete return-to-play and retirement endpoints. Results: A total of 26 athletes underwent ACLR; of these, 84% (95% CI, 63.9%-95.5%) returned to play at a mean 372.5 days (95% CI, 323.5-421.5 days) after surgery. Career length after injury was a mean of 3.36 seasons (95% CI, 2.27-4.45 seasons). Factors that contributed to an increased probability of return to play included younger age at injury (odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.47-0.92]; P = .0337) and fewer years of experience in the NBA before injury (odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.45-0.93]; P = .0335). Postoperatively, athletes played a significantly lower percentage of total games in the first season (48.4%; P = .0004) and second season (62.1%; P = .0067) as compared with the preinjury season (78.5%). Player efficiency rating in the first season was 19.3% less than that in the preinjury season ( P = .0056). Performance in the second postoperative season was not significantly different versus preinjury. Conclusion: NBA players have a high rate of RTP after ACLR. However, it may take longer than a single season for elite NBA athletes to return to their full preinjury performance. Younger players and those with less NBA experience returned at higher rates.

Playing Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Australian Football League Players From 1999 to 2013

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1550-1556
Author(s):  
Courtney C.H. Lai ◽  
Julian A. Feller ◽  
Kate E. Webster
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Average Level ◽  
Australian Football League ◽  
Australian Football ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Achieving preinjury levels of athletic performance has been challenging for elite athletes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Although a recent study found that 77% of Australian Football League (AFL) players who underwent ACL reconstruction from 1999 to 2013 returned to play at the highest level, the study did not indicate how consistently or well they were able to play. Purpose: To identify the number of AFL players who returned to play consistently over 2 seasons after ACL reconstruction, compare their playing performance in these seasons with preinjury performance, and evaluate factors associated with returning to preinjury levels of performance. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Analysis included 104 AFL players who underwent ACL reconstruction between 1999 and 2013. All had played at least 10 AFL matches in 1 season before ACL injury. Ranking points, as devised by AFL statisticians, were used to measure individual playing performance. Results: Of the 104 players who played at least 10 matches in 1 season before ACL injury, 53 (51%) returned to play at least 10 matches in 2 seasons after surgery. Of these 53 players, 36 (68%) returned to their preinjury levels of performance. The 17 remaining players who did not return to their preinjury performance still performed comparably to the AFL average level after surgery. Players <25 years old (odds ratio = 2.9, P = .01) or <90 kg (odds ratio = 2.7, P = .03) had greater odds of returning to their preinjury levels of performance. Conclusion: Returning to play on a consistent basis was a substantial challenge for AFL players after ACL reconstruction. However, among players who did return to play consistently over 2 seasons, their postsurgery average performance was comparable with the AFL average level of performance, and two-thirds returned to their preinjury levels of performance. Younger and lighter players were more likely to return to their preinjury levels of performance, possibly given the nature of AFL club playing list management decisions.

Effect of Dynamic Changes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament In Situ Graft Force on the Biological Healing Response of the Graft-Tunnel Interface

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 915-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Ma ◽  
Michael Schär ◽  
Tina Chen ◽  
Marco Sisto ◽  
Joseph Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Male Rats ◽  
Joint Motion ◽  
Dynamic Changes ◽  
Knee Motion ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts that are placed for reconstruction are subject to complex forces. Current “anatomic” ACL reconstruction techniques may result in greater in situ graft forces. The biological effect of changing magnitudes of ACL graft force on graft-tunnel osseointegration is not well understood. Purpose: The research objective is to determine how mechanical force on the ACL graft during knee motion affects tendon healing in the tunnel. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Male rats (N = 120) underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction with a soft tissue flexor tendon autograft. ACL graft force was modulated by different femoral tunnel positions at the time of surgery to create different graft force patterns with knee motion. External fixators were used to eliminate graft load during cage activity. A custom knee flexion device was used to deliver graft load through controlled daily knee motion. Graft-tunnel healing was then assessed via biomechanical, micro–computed tomography, and histological analyses. Results: ACL graft-tunnel healing was sensitive to dynamic changes in graft forces with postoperative knee motion. High ACL graft force with joint motion resulted in early inferior ACL graft load to failure as compared with knees that had low-force ACL grafts and joint motion and knees that were immobilized (mean ± SD: 5.50 ± 2.30 N vs 9.91 ± 3.54 N [ P = .013] and 10.90 ± 2.8 N [ P = .001], respectively). Greater femoral bone volume fraction was seen in immobilized knees and knees with low-force ACL grafts when compared with high-force ACL grafts at 3 and 6 weeks. Conclusion: The authors were able to demonstrate that ACL graft-tunnel incorporation is sensitive to dynamic changes in ACL graft force with joint motion. Early high forces on the ACL graft appear to impair graft-tunnel osseointegration. Clinical Relevance: Current “anatomic” techniques of ACL reconstruction may result in greater graft excursion and force with knee motion. Our results suggest that the postoperative rehabilitation regimen may need to be modified during the early phase of healing to protect the reconstruction.

Is Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Necessary to Confirm Device Position for Femoral-Sided Cortical Suspensory Fixation during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (03) ◽  
pp. 265-269
Author(s):  
B. Christian Balldin ◽  
Clayton W. Nuelle ◽  
Thomas M. DeBerardino
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Intraoperative Imaging ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Intraoperative Fluoroscopy ◽  
Suspensory Fixation ◽  
Fluoroscopic Imaging ◽  
Group A ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Group B ◽  
Device Location

AbstractIncreased laxity within the graft construct system can lead to graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Suboptimal cortical device positioning could lead to increased laxity within the system, which could influence the mechanics and function of the graft reconstruction. This study evaluates the benefit of intraoperative fluoroscopy to confirm device position on the femur during ACL reconstruction using cortical suspensory fixation. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent soft tissue ACL reconstruction using a suspensory cortical device for femoral fixation were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were split into two groups: Group A utilized anteromedial portal visualization and had intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging performed at the time of ACL graft fixation to confirm femoral device placement on the lateral femoral metaphyseal cortex. Group B utilized anteromedial portal visualization alone. Both groups had radiographic X-rays performed at the first postoperative visit to evaluate device location and all images were independently evaluated by three fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Device position was classified as optimal if there was complete apposition of the entire device against the femoral cortex and suboptimal if it was > 2 mm off the cortex. Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare the groups for statistical significance. The results showed 0/60 (0%) patients in group A had suboptimal device position at postoperative follow-up, while 4/40 (10%) patients in group B had suboptimal device position (p = 0.013). There were no graft failures in group A and one graft failure in group B. There was a significant difference in cortical device position in patients who had intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging versus patients who had no intraoperative imaging. The use of confirmatory intraoperative imaging may be beneficial to confirm appropriate device location when using a femoral cortical suspensory fixation technique for ACL reconstruction.

scholarly journals Meniscal Repair with Concurrent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Is ACL Graft Choice Predictive of Meniscal Repair Success?

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0035
Author(s):  
Hytham S. Salem ◽  
Laura J. Huston ◽  
Alex Zajichek ◽  
Michelle Lora Wolcott ◽  
Eric C. McCarty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Baseline Activity ◽  
Graft Choice ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Objectives: The success rate of meniscal repair is known to increase with concurrent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the influence of ACL graft choice has not been described. The current study examines the effect of ACL graft choice on the outcome of meniscal repair performed in conjunction with ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Methods: Patients who underwent meniscal repair with concurrent primary ACLR were identified from a longitudinal, prospective cohort. Patient demographics and subjective outcome measures including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Marx activity rating scale were collected preoperatively. Arthroscopic assessment of meniscal tear characteristics and associated repair technique were recorded intraoperatively. Patients with subsequent repair failure, defined as any subsequent surgical procedure addressing the meniscus repaired at index surgery, were identified and operative notes were obtained in order to accurately classify pathology and treatment. A logistic regression model was built to assess the association of patient specific factors, ACL graft, baseline Marx activity level and meniscal tear laterality with the occurrence of repair failure at 6-year follow-up. Results: A total of 646 patients underwent ACLR with concurrent meniscal repair. Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and soft tissue (ST) autograft were used in 55.7% and 33.9% of cases, respectively, while allografts were utilized in the remaining cases. Table 1 summarizes the univariate analysis of each baseline variable. A total of 101 patients (15.6%) required subsequent surgery on the meniscus repaired at index surgery, including 89 meniscectomies (87 partial, 2 subtotal), 11 revision meniscal repairs, and 1 meniscus allograft transplantation. No statistically significant difference in meniscal repair failure rate was observed based on patient age, sex, BMI or smoking status. The odds of meniscal repair failure within 6 years of surgery for patients with only a lateral meniscal repair are 68% less than those with only a medial meniscal repair (CI: 41%, 83%; p<0.001). There is a statistically significant relationship between baseline Marx activity and the risk of subsequent meniscal repair, though it is nonlinear—patients with low or high baseline activity are at the highest risk of meniscal repair failure (CI: 1.05,1.31; p=0.004, Figure 1). The estimated odds of meniscal repair failure for BTB allograft, ST allograft, and ST autograft were 2.78 (CI: 0.84,9.19; p=0.09), 2.29 (CI: 0.97,5.45; p=0.06), and 1.42 (CI:0.87,2.32; p=0.16) times that of BTB autograft, respectively, although none proved statistically significant. Meniscal repair failure is associated with significantly lower 6-year scores for all KOOS components and the IKDC (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in MARX activity at 6-years (p=0.27). Conclusion: In the setting of primary ACLR, the risk of meniscal repair failure is increased with medial versus lateral meniscal repair. Patients with low or high baseline activity levels are also at an increased risk. ACL graft choice seems to have an effect on meniscal repair failure that approaches but does not reach statistical significance. A larger sample size may be required to accept the null hypothesis. [Table: see text][Figure: see text]

scholarly journals Safety of the application of Rigidfix cross-pin system via different tibial tunnels for tibial fixation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Wang ◽  
Hua-qiang Fan ◽  
Wenli Dai ◽  
Hong-Da Li ◽  
Yang-pan Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Tibial Fixation ◽  
Group A ◽  
Coronal Section ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Group B ◽  
External Aperture

Abstract Background We investigate the safety of the application of the Rigidfix cross-pin system via different tibial tunnels in the tibial fixation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Five adult fresh cadaver knees were fixed with the Rigidfix cross-pins in the tibial fixation site during ACL reconstruction. Two different tibial tunnel groups were established: in group A, the tunnel external aperture was placed at the 25° angle of coronal section; in group B, the tunnel external aperture was placed at the 45° angle of coronal section. The guide was placed at the plane 0.5 mm below articular facet through the tibial tunnel, with three rotation positions set at 0°, 30°, and 60° slopes. The incidences of iatrogenic injuries at tibial plateau cartilage (TPC), medial collateral ligament (MCL), and patellar tendon in three different slope angles were calculated in groups A and B and the results were analyzed by using chi square test. Results The iatrogenic injuries at MCL, TPC, and patellar tendon could occur after the Rigidfix cross-pin system was placed 5 mm below tibial plateau cartilage for ACL reconstruction. The incidences of TPC injury (χ2 = 5.662, P = 0.017) and MCL injury (P = 0.048, Fisher exact probability method) were significantly lower in group A than in group B. However, the incidence of patellar tendon injury showed no significant difference between these two groups (χ2 = 0.120, P = 0.729). Conclusions When the Rigidfix cross-pin system is used for ACL reconstruction at the tibial fixation site, the external aperture of tibial tunnel should not be placed at the excessively posterosuperior site, to avoid MCL and TPC injuries.

Modified Iliotibial Band Tenodesis Is Indicated to Correct Intraoperative Residual Pivot Shift After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Autologous Hamstring Tendon Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1069-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Porter ◽  
Bruce Shadbolt
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Similar Rate ◽  
Iliotibial Band ◽  
Group A ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Group B

Background: The indications for the addition of anterolateral soft tissue augmentation to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and its effectiveness remain uncertain. Purpose: To determine if modified iliotibial band tenodesis (MITBT) can improve clinical outcomes and reduce the recurrence of ACL ruptures when added to ACL reconstruction in patients with a residual pivot shift. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients with a primary ACL rupture satisfying the following inclusion criteria were enrolled: first ACL rupture, involved in pivoting sports, skeletally mature, no meniscal repair performed, and residual pivot shift relative to the contralateral uninjured knee immediately after ACL reconstruction. Patients were randomized to group A (no further surgery) or group B (MITBT added) and were followed up for 2 years. The patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures used were the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale of sport/recreation (Sport/Rec), KOOS subscale of quality of life (QoL), Lysholm knee score (LKS), Tegner activity scale (TAS), recurrent ACL ruptures, or need for further surgery in either knee. Analysis of variance was used to compare PROs; the Wilcoxon test was used for the TAS; and the chi-square test was used for recurrence of ACL ruptures, meniscal injuries, and contralateral ACL ruptures ( P < .05). Results: A total of 55 patients were randomized: 27 to group A (female:male ratio = 15:12; mean age, 22.3 ± 3.7 years) and 28 to group B (female:male ratio = 17:11; mean age, 21.8 ± 4.1 years). At 2-year follow-up, group A had a similar IKDC score (90.9 ± 10.7 vs 94.2 ± 11.2; respectively; P = .21), lower KOOS Sport/Rec score (91.5 ± 6.4 vs 95.3 ± 4.4, respectively; P = .02), similar KOOS QoL score (92.0 ± 4.8 vs 95.1 ± 4.3, respectively; P = .14), lower LKS score (92.5 ± 4.8 vs 96.8 ± 8.0, respectively; P = .004), lower TAS score (median, 7 [range, 7-9] vs 8 [range, 8-10], respectively; P = .03), higher rate of recurrence (14.8% vs 0.0%, respectively; P < .001), similar rate of meniscal tears (14.8% vs 3.6%, respectively; P = .14), and similar rate of contralateral ACL ruptures (3.7% vs 3.6%, respectively; P = .99) relative to group B. Conclusion: The augmentation of ACL reconstruction with MITBT reduced the risk of recurrent ACL ruptures in knees with a residual pivot shift after ACL reconstruction and improved KOOS Sport/Rec, LKS, and TAS scores. Registration: ACTRN12618001043224 (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry)

Tibial Slope and Its Effect on Force in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Force Increases Linearly as Posterior Tibial Slope Increases

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Bernhardson ◽  
Zachary S. Aman ◽  
Grant J. Dornan ◽  
Bryson R. Kemler ◽  
Hunter W. Storaci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Linear Relationship ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Slope ◽  
Tibial Osteotomy ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Posterior Tibial ◽  
Axially Loaded ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Previous work has reported that increased tibial slope is directly correlated with increased anterior tibial translation, possibly predisposing patients to higher rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and causing higher rates of ACL graft failures over the long term. However, the effect of changes in sagittal plane tibial slope on ACL reconstruction (ACLR) graft force has not been well defined. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of changes in sagittal plane tibial slope on ACLR graft force at varying knee flexion angles. Our null hypothesis was that changing the sagittal plane tibial slope would not affect force on the ACL graft. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten male fresh-frozen cadaveric knees had a posterior tibial osteotomy performed and an external fixator placed for testing and accurate slope adjustment. Following ACLR, specimens were compressed with a 200-N axial load at flexion angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°, and the graft loads were recorded through a force transducer clamped to the graft. Tibial slope was varied between −2° and 20° of posterior slope at 2° increments under these test conditions. Results: ACL graft force in the loaded testing state increased linearly as slope increased. This effect was independent of flexion angle. The final model utilized a 2-factor linear mixed-effects regression model and noted a significant, highly positive, and linear relationship between tibial slope and ACL graft force in axially loaded knees at all flexion angles tested (slope coefficient = 0.92, SE = 0.08, P < .001). Significantly higher graft force was also observed at 0° of flexion as compared with all other flexion angles for the loaded condition (all P < .001). Conclusion: The authors found that tibial slope had a strong linear relationship to the amount of graft force experienced by an ACL graft in axially loaded knees. Thus, a flatter tibial slope had significantly less loading of ACL grafts, while steeper slopes increased ACL graft loading. Our biomechanical findings support recent clinical evidence of increased ACL graft failure with steeper tibial slope secondary to increased graft loading. Clinical Relevance: Evaluation of the effect of increasing tibial slope on ACL graft force can guide surgeons when deciding if a slope-decreasing proximal tibial osteotomy should be performed before a revision ACLR. Overall, as slope increases, ACL graft force increases, and in our study, flatter slopes had lower ACL graft forces and were protective of the ACLR graft.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document