Aggressive placement of distal limb perfusion catheter in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 796-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suguru Ohira ◽  
Masashi Kawamura ◽  
Kristin Ahern ◽  
Nicholas Cavarocchi ◽  
Hitoshi Hirose
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Early Period ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Late Period ◽  
Distal Limb ◽  
Lower Limb Ischemia ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Distal Perfusion

Objective: The aim of this study is to review the impacts of aggressive placement of a distal perfusion catheter on the outcomes in patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation via femoral cannulation. Methods: Analysis was performed with 143 consecutive femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation. Patients were divided into two groups: the early period (October 2010 to December 2012, N = 47) where placement of a distal perfusion catheter was attempted percutaneously but not surgically and the late period (January 2013 to November 2018, N = 96) in which placement of distal perfusion catheter was aggressively utilized both percutaneously and surgically. The modification of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation protocol for the late period involved (1) an immediate insertion of a distal perfusion catheter regardless of the size of femoral arterial cannula, (2) an open insertion of a distal perfusion catheter if percutaneous approach failed, and (3) when venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation was completed at a non-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation center, it was encouraged that they attempt insertion of a distal perfusion catheter at the time of cannulation. Results: In the late period, a distal perfusion catheter was placed in 96% (92/96) which was significantly increased from 66% (31/47) in the early period. Of these 92 patients in late period, nine patients (9.8%) required open direct insertion of a distal perfusion catheter. The incidence of lower limb ischemia (early vs. late period 26% vs 12%, P = 0.031) was significantly decreased in the late period. Logistic regression analyses showed that distal perfusion catheter placement was the only factor for preventing lower limb ischemia. Conclusion: Aggressive insertion of a distal perfusion catheter even utilizing surgical cut-down technique was shown to decrease the incidence of distal limb complications.

scholarly journals Risk factors for critical limb ischemia in patients undergoing femoral cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Is distal limb perfusion a mandatory approach?

Perfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Kaufeld ◽  
Eric Beckmann ◽  
Fabio Ius ◽  
Nurbol Koigeldiev ◽  
Wiebke Sommer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Distal Limb ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Limb Perfusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support is a well-established tool in the care of severe refractory cardiac and respiratory failure. The application of this support may serve as a bridge to transplant, recovery or to implantation of a ventricular assist device. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support can be administered through an open surgical access via the common femoral or axillary artery or a percutaneous approach using Seldinger technique. Both techniques may obstruct the blood flow to the lower limb and may cause a significant ischemia with possible limb loss. Malperfusion of the distal limb can be avoided using an ipsilateral distal limb perfusion, which may be established by adding a single-lumen catheter during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment to overcome the obstruction. The aim of this study is to distinguish the presence or absence of a distal limb perfusion regarding the incidence of distal limb ischemia. Furthermore, expected risk factors of open and percutaneous femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation installation were evaluated for the development of distal limb ischemia. Methods: Between January 2012 and September 2015, 489 patients received venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at our institution. In total, 307 patients (204 male, 103 female) with femoral cannulation were included in the analysis. The cohort was distinguished by the presence (group A; n = 237) or absence (group B; n = 70) of a distal limb perfusion during peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment. Furthermore, a risk factor analysis for the development of distal limb ischemia was performed. Results: The main indications for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy were a low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) (53%) and failed weaning of extracorporeal circulation (23%). A total of 23 patients (7.49%) under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support developed severe distal limb malperfusion (3.38% in group A vs 21.42% in group B). Preemptive installation of distal limb perfusion extended the intervention-free intervals to 7.8 ± 19.3 days in group A and 6.3 ± 12.5 in group B. A missing distal limb perfusion (p = 0.001) was identified as a main risk factor for critical limb ischemia. Other comorbidities such as arterial occlusion disease (p = 0.738) were not statistically significantly associated. Surgical intervention due to vascular complications after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation explantation was needed in 14 cases (4.22% in group A and 5.71% in group B). Conclusion: We were able to identify the absence of distal limb perfusion as an independent risk factor for the development of critical distal limb ischemia during femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment. The application of a distal limb perfusion should be considered as a mandatory approach in the context of femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment regardless of the implantation technique.

scholarly journals NESVS13. Distal Perfusion Cannulas Reduce Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Related Limb Ischemia but Not Mortality

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. e103-e104
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Hanley ◽  
William C. Mackey ◽  
Payam Salehi ◽  
Mark D. Iafrati ◽  
Luis Suarez
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Distal Perfusion

Efficacy of Distal Perfusion Cannulae in Preventing Limb Ischemia During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. E263-E273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Yi Juo ◽  
Matthew Skancke ◽  
Yas Sanaiha ◽  
Aditya Mantha ◽  
Juan C. Jimenez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Distal Perfusion

scholarly journals Double Distal Perfusion Catheters for Severe Limb Ischemia on the IABP Side in Patients Who Received Femoro-Femoral VA-ECMO With IABP

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Xin ◽  
Liangshan Wang ◽  
Xiaqiu Tian ◽  
Dengbang Hou ◽  
Hong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Distal Perfusion ◽  
Va Ecmo ◽  
Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock

Background: Limited research is available on the pattern of double distal perfusion catheters in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) with an intra-aortic balloon pump(IABP). Here, we compared the outcomes of a double distal perfusion catheter and conventional treatment in patients who received VA-ECMO with IABP and had severe lower limb ischemia on the IABP side.Methods: We reviewed the data of 15 adult patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock who received VA-ECMO via femoral cannulation combined with an IABP in the contralateral artery that was complicated with severe acute limb ischemia (ALI) on the same side as the IABP between January 2004 and December 2016. Patients underwent symptomatic treatment (conventional group, n = 9) and double distal perfusion catheterization treatment (DDPC group, n = 6). ALI was monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy placed on both calves after double distal perfusion catheters. The outcomes were compared.Results: All 6 patients who underwent double distal perfusion catheters were successfully decannulated without the development of osteofascial compartment syndrome, amputation, or bleeding and infection of the double distal perfusion catheters. The number of patients who weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation successfully in the DDPC and conventional groups was 6 (100%) and 3 (33%, p = 0.028), respectively. The in-hospital mortality rates were 17% and 89% for the DDPC and conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.011).Conclusions: DDPC can be considered a strategy for severe limb ischemia on the IABP side in patients who received femoro-femoral VA-ECMO with IABP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document