The Educational Consequences of Parental Immigration Detention

2020 ◽  
pp. 073112142093774
Author(s):  
Gabriela Gonzalez ◽  
Caitlin Patler

Every year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement imprisons hundreds of thousands of noncitizens as they await adjudication on their deportation proceedings. Importantly, many detained individuals have lived in the interior of the country for many years and are parents of young, dependent, school-age children living in the United States. This analysis brings together and builds upon research on parental incarceration and international migration. We analyze 104 multigenerational interviews conducted in California with detained parents, their current or former nondetained spouses/partners, and the school-age children they share. Our findings suggest that children’s academic trajectories are seriously disrupted by the trauma, stigma, and strain of parental imprisonment. Moreover, these vulnerabilities are enhanced in unique ways by children’s positionality as members of mixed-immigration-status families facing the possibility of deportation. Our findings suggest that parental immigration detention can have intergenerational consequences for children’s mobility that disrupt traditional pathways of immigrant integration in mixed-immigration-status families.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Patler ◽  
Gabriela Gonzalez

While an extensive body of literature has analyzed the spillover and intergenerational consequences of mass incarceration, fewer studies explore the consequences of a parallel system: mass immigration detention. Every year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement imprisons hundreds of thousands of noncitizens as they await adjudication on their deportation proceedings, sometimes for months or years at a time. Many detained individuals have lived in the United States for decades and have spouses and/or dependent children that rely on them. This analysis brings together research on immigrant families, mass incarceration, and system avoidance to examine the spillover consequences of immigration detention. Using a multigenerational and multi-perspective research design, we analyze 104 interviews conducted in California with detained parents, non-detained spouses/partners, and their school-age children. Findings suggest that members of these mixed-status families may limit their engagement with surveilling institutions during a family member’s detention. These experiences are rooted in what we call compounded vulnerability—that is, both in the experience of parental/spousal confinement but also in their positionality as members of mixed-immigration-status families facing the possibility of deportation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Patler ◽  
Gabriela Gonzalez

Abstract While an extensive body of literature has analyzed the spillover and intergenerational consequences of mass incarceration, fewer studies explore the consequences of a parallel system: mass immigration detention. Every year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement imprisons hundreds of thousands of noncitizens as they await adjudication on their deportation proceedings, sometimes for months or years at a time. Many detained individuals have lived in the United States for decades and have spouses and/or dependent children that rely on them. This analysis brings together research on immigrant families, mass incarceration, and system avoidance to examine the spillover consequences of immigration detention. Using a multigenerational and multi-perspective research design, we analyze 104 interviews conducted in California with detained parents, non-detained spouses/partners, and their school-age children. Findings suggest that members of these mixed-status families may limit their engagement with surveilling institutions during a family member’s detention. These experiences are rooted in what we call compounded vulnerability—that is, both in the experience of parental/spousal confinement but also as members of mixed-immigration-status families facing the possibility of deportation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 620-639
Author(s):  
Nancy Lu ◽  
Devyn C. Rigsby ◽  
Sarah A. Keim ◽  
Eli Rapoport ◽  
Andrew Adesman

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 129 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. S54-S62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony E. Fiore ◽  
Scott Epperson ◽  
Dennis Perrotta ◽  
Henry Bernstein ◽  
Kathleen Neuzil

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Sullivan ◽  
Vahram Ghushchyan ◽  
Prakash Navaratnam ◽  
Howard S. Friedman ◽  
Abhishek Kavati ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatma E. Marouf

COVID-19 has spread quickly through immigration detention facilities in the United States. As of December 2, 2020, there have been over 7,500 confirmed COVID-19 cases among detained noncitizens. This Article examines why COVID-19 spread rapidly in immigration detention facilities, how it has transformed detention and deportation proceedings, and what can be done to improve the situation for detained noncitizens. Part I identifies key factors that contributed to the rapid spread of COVID-19 in immigration detention. While these factors are not an exhaustive list, they highlight important weaknesses in the immigration detention system. Part II then examines how the pandemic changed the size of the population in detention, the length of detention, and the nature of removal proceedings. In Part III, the Article offers recommendations for mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on detained noncitizens. These recommendations include using more alternatives to detention, curtailing transfers between detention facilities, establishing a better tracking system for medically vulnerable detainees, prioritizing bond hearings and habeas petitions, and including immigration detainees among the groups to be offered COVID-19 vaccine in the initial phase of the vaccination program. The lessons learned from the spread of COVID-19 in immigration detention will hopefully lead to a better response to any future pandemics. In discussing these issues, the Article draws on national data from January 2019 through November 2020 published by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), two agencies within DHS. The main datasets used are detention statistics published by ICE for FY 2019 (Oct. 2018-Sep. 2019), FY 2020 (Oct. 2019-Sep. 2020), and the first two months of FY 2021 (Oct. 2020-Nov. 2020). These datasets include detention statistics about individuals arrested by ICE in the interior of the country, as well as by CBP at or near the border. Additionally, the Article draws on separate data published by CBP regarding the total number of apprehensions at the border based on its immigration authority under Title 8 of the United States Code, as well as the number of expulsions at the border based on its public health authority under Title 42 of the United States Code.


1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 247-247
Author(s):  
Howard Sonnenblick

Enterobius vermicularis, more commonly known as pinworm, is the most common intestinal nematode in the United States, affecting 5% to 15% of the population. Although infection may appear in all age groups and socioeconomic levels, it is most prevalent in preschool and school-age children. Typically, embryonated eggs are ingested and migrate to the duodenum where they hatch and undergo sexual maturation before reaching the cecum. Adult pinworms reside in the cecum, emerge at night through the anus, and migrate to the perianal region where gravid females deposit their eggs and die. The eggs cause anal pruritis, which leads to scratching and accumulation under the fingernails, thereby promoting auto-infection and spread to close contacts.


Autism ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-337
Author(s):  
Michelle Flippin ◽  
Debbie L Hahs-Vaughn

This study examined parent couples’ participation in and satisfaction with speech-language therapy for school-age children with autism spectrum disorder in the United States. Responses from 40 father–mother couples ( n = 80 parents) were examined across therapy components (i.e. parent–therapist communication, assessment, planning, and intervention). Descriptive frequencies, chi-square tests, intraclass correlations, and dyadic multilevel modeling were used to examine participation across fathers and mothers and within parent couples. Compared to mothers, fathers communicated less with therapists and participated less in assessment and planning. Fathers also had lower satisfaction than mothers with parent–therapist communication and planning. Although few parents participated in school-based therapy sessions, 40% of fathers and 50% of mothers participated in homework. However, few parents received homework support from therapists. Results are discussed in terms of clinical implications for interventionists to more effectively engage both fathers and mothers in family-centered speech-language therapy for school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document