From Barrios to Yale: The Role of Parenting Strategies in Latino Families

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosario Ceballo
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassandra A. Stanton ◽  
Krista B. Highland ◽  
Kenneth P. Tercyak ◽  
Gheorghe Luta ◽  
Raymond S. Niaura

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan M. Garvey ◽  
Margarita Villagrana ◽  
Joshua G. Kellison ◽  
Felipe G. Castro ◽  
Flavio Marsiglia

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 590-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tovah Klein ◽  
Alice W. Pope ◽  
Eskedar Getahun ◽  
Jill Thompson

Objective: To conduct a qualitative evaluation of parenting among families with school-aged and young adolescent children with craniofacial anomalies (CFAs). Methods: Interview responses were obtained from nine mothers of children ages 9 to 14 years old with CFAs. Mothers were asked to describe their perceptions of their children, their children's special needs because of CFAs, and their parenting strategies. Narratives were coded into categories, including maternal concerns and worries, children's strengths, proactive maternal behaviors, and role of CFAs in the families’ lives. Results and Conclusions: Mothers’ responses indicated concern and protectiveness because of the challenges of having a CFA, as well as parenting strategies intended to promote autonomy and positive social and emotional adjustment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan T Gardner

There is a long standing controversy in education as to whether education ought to be teacher- or student- centered. Interestingly, this controversy parallels the parent- vs. child-centered theoretical swings with regard to good parenting. One obvious difference between the two poles is the mode of communication. “Authoritarian” teaching and parenting strategies focus on the need of those who have much to learn to “do as they are told,” i.e. the authority talks, the child listens. “Non-authoritarian” strategies are anchored in the assumption that youngsters ought to be encouraged to develop their natural interests and talents and hence that it is important to allow the children to do the talking and that adults listen. Both strategies seemed flawed due to the absence of the inherent wisdom of its opposing view.This chasm can be overcome. The Community of Inquiry, a pedagogical method used in Philosophy for Children, demands a method of communication which is able to bridge this gap. A Community of Inquiry is neither teacher-centered and controlled nor student-centered and controlled, but centered on and controlled by the demands of truth. Truth is absolutely essential to this method; it is only because of progress toward truth that participants are ultimately convinced of the fruitfulness of the process. Truth, however, is a hard taskmaster; it places severe restrictions on participants and puts exacting demands on the facilitator. These inherent restrictions and demands are too often underplayed, overlooked and sometimes seemingly overtly denied (see Reed 1992a) by those who, quite correctly emphasize that ultimately this method depends on maintenance and enhancement of student autonomy. This underrating of the role of the facilitator has led to a severe undervaluing of this otherwise brilliant pedagogical method, but worse, it has left novice teacher/facilitators ill prepared to utilize this method successfully.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document