Advance Directives Affecting Medical Treatment Choices

1997 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Waddell ◽  
Roger M. Clarnette ◽  
Michael Smith ◽  
Lynn Oldham

Advance directives theoretically enhance individual autonomy and facilitate treatment decision making at the end of life. There is little empirical evidence to support this, however. Based on a national postal survey of 2172 randomly selected medical practitioners (response rate 73%), this paper examines the effect advance medical directives have on (a) treatment prescribing for terminally ill people and (b) the degree of difficulty practitioners experience in making treatment choices. A hypothetical patient with Alzheimer's disease and an acute life-threatening illness was presented with and without an advance directive. With a directive, respondents were more uniform in their choice of treatment, with 86% choosing as the patient had requested. Difficulty with decision making was also less with the directive, 31% vs 45% with no directive. The data indicate that advance directives do affect practitioners’ treatment choices in favor of patient wishes and reduce the difficulty practitioners may experience in making them.

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuya Kushida ◽  
Takeshi Hiramoto ◽  
Yuriko Yamakawa

In spite of increasing advocacy for patients’ participation in psychiatric decision-making, there has been little research on how patients actually participate in decision-making in psychiatric consultations. This study explores how patients take the initiative in decision-making over treatment in outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. Using the methodology of conversation analysis, we analyze 85 video-recorded ongoing consultations and find that patients select between two practices for taking the initiative in decision-making: making explicit requests for a treatment and displaying interest in a treatment without explicitly requesting it. A close inspection of transcribed interaction reveals that patients make explicit requests under the circumstances where they believe the candidate treatment is appropriate for their condition, whereas they merely display interest in a treatment when they are not certain about its appropriateness. By fitting practices to take the initiative in decision-making with the way they describe their current condition, patients are optimally managing their desire for particular treatments and the validity of their initiative actions. In conclusion, we argue that the orderly use of the two practices is one important resource for patients’ participation in treatment decision-making.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. O'Brien ◽  
Timothy Whelan ◽  
Amiram Gafni ◽  
Cathy Charles ◽  
Peter Ellis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (17) ◽  
pp. 2826-2839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Caputo ◽  
Daniela Cianniello ◽  
Antonio Giordano ◽  
Michela Piezzo ◽  
Maria Riemma ◽  
...  

The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to hormonal therapy is often considered questionable in patients with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer. Low risk of disease relapse after endocrine treatment alone and/or a low sensitivity to chemotherapy are reasons behind not all patients benefit from chemotherapy. Most of the patients could be exposed to unnecessary treatment- related adverse events and health care costs when treatment decision-making is based only on classical clinical histological features. Gene expression profile has been developed to refine physician’s decision-making process and to tailor personalized treatment to patients. In particular, these tests are designed to spare patients the side effects of unnecessary treatment, and ensure that adjuvant chemotherapy is correctly recommended to patients with early breast cancer. In this review, we will discuss the main diagnostic tests and their potential clinical applications (Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, PAM50/Prosigna, EndoPredict, MapQuant Dx, IHC4, and Theros-Breast Cancer Gene Expression Ratio Assay).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document