Impact of New-Onset Left Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 680-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula ◽  
Shane M. Gillespie ◽  
David W. Barbara ◽  
Nandan S. Anavekar ◽  
Juan N. Pulido
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Background: Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) are commonly seen in severe sepsis and septic shock; however, their role in patients with concurrent invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is less well defined. Methods: This was a prospective observational study on all patients admitted to all the intensive care units (ICUs) at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from August 2007 to January 2009. All adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock and concurrent IMV without prior heart failure underwent transthoracic echocardiography within 24 hours. Patients with active pregnancy, prior congenital or valvular heart disease, and prosthetic cardiac valves were excluded. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction was defined as LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% and LVDD as E/e′ >15. Primary outcome was hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included IMV duration, ICU length of stay (LOS), and total LOS. Two-tailed P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In a total of 106 patients, 58 (54.7%) met our inclusion criteria, with 17 (29.3%), 11 (19.0%), and 5 (8.6%) having LVSD, LVDD, and both, respectively. The cohorts with and without LVSD and LVDD did not differ significantly in their baseline characteristics and laboratory and ventilatory parameters. Compared to those without LVSD, patients with LVSD had higher LV end-systolic diameters but were not different in their left atrial diameters or E/e′ ratio. Patients with LVDD had a higher E velocity and E/e′ ratio compared to those without LVDD. Hospital mortality was not different in patients with and without LVSD (8 [47%] vs 21 [51%], P = 1.00) and LVDD (8 [73%] vs 21 [45%], P = .18). Secondary outcomes were not different between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction did not influence in-hospital outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock and concurrent IMV.

Abstract 18294: Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Early After Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest is Associated With Shockable Arrest Rhythm

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob C Jentzer ◽  
Hussein Abu-Daya ◽  
Asher Shafton ◽  
Meshe Chonde ◽  
Didier Chalhoub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Mitral Annulus ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Mitral Annulus Velocity ◽  
Fractional Shortening

Introduction: Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is common after resuscitation from cardiac arrest (CA). The association of echocardiographic LVSD with cardiac rhythm during CA is not well described. Hypothesis: Patients with a shockable rhythm (VT/VF) will have a greater degree of LVSD by echocardiography after CA. Methods: Prospective registry of patients resuscitated from CA underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within 24 hours after CA. We determined 2D measurements, LVEF, spectral Doppler of mitral inflow and LV outflow, systolic and diastolic tissue Doppler of the mitral annulus velocity, and tricuspid plane annular excursion (TAPSE). We collected data on in-hospital mortality as well as vasopressor doses and troponin I levels. TTE parameters and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with a shockable (VT/VF) arrest rhythm and a non-shockable (asystole/PEA) arrest rhythm and between survivors and non-survivors using t-tests and ANOVA. Results: Of the 55 patients, the 23 (42%) with shockable CA rhythms had significantly higher LV end-systolic dimension (4.1cm vs. 3.3cm, p = 0.0073), lower LV fractional shortening (0.15 vs. 0.28, p <0.0001), and lower LVEF both by visual estimate (36.2% vs. 52.3%, p = 0.0012) and by Simpson’s biplane method (37.5% vs. 52.3%, p = 0.0506). Other measured TTE parameters did not differ between groups, including TAPSE (shockable 1.53 vs. non-shockable 1.82, p = 0.1731). Admission and peak 24 hour vasopressor requirements did not differ between groups. Peak troponin levels were higher (22.26 vs. 3.88, p = 0.0198) in patients with shockable CA rhythms, but admission troponin levels were no different (0.88 vs. 0.51, p = 0.1527). TTE parameters did not differ between survivors and non-survivors (visual LVEF 47.0% vs. 44.2%, p = 0.5968; LV fractional shortening 0.19 vs. 0.25, p = 0.0916). Conclusions: Patients with shockable CA rhythms have more severe LVSD on 24 hour echocardiography despite similar vasopressor requirements and admission troponin levels. Echocardiographic parameters at 24 hours did not predict in-hospital mortality. Early echocardiography after CA appears more useful for differentiating primary CA rhythm than for predicting mortality.

Impact of Bi-ventricular systolic function on mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elif Tükenmez Tigen ◽  
Alper Kepez ◽  
Murat Sünbül ◽  
Beste Özben ◽  
Buket Ertürk Şengel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Myocardial Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Survivor Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Echocardiographic Examination ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) systolic performance in patients with sepsis or septic shock and possible functional alteration on in-hospital mortality. Patients and Methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients with the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock were included in the study. All patients underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination. Data of patients discharged from the intensive care unit was compared with data of patients who died in the hospital. Results: Fifteen patients (40.5%) survived, while 22 patients were died in the hospital (59.5%). A significant difference was detected between survivor and non-survivor groups regarding before discharge or death level of inflammatory markers such as CRP (p=0.05) and procalcitonin (p=0.03) besides BNP (p=0.01) and SOFA (p=0.009) score. There were two patients (5.4%) with EF value less than %50 in the study population. Eight patients (21.6%) displayed hypokinesia on the apical segment, and four patients (10.8%) had TAPSE values below 17 mm. One patient (6.6%) in the survivor group, but seven patients (31.8%) in the non-survivor group had apical hypokinesia with a trend towards significance (p=0.068). One patient in the survivor group (6.6%) and three patients (13.6%) in the non-survivor group had RV systolic dysfunction (p: 0.51). Conclusion: We found a much lower rate of LV and RV systolic dysfunction in patients with sepsis or septic shock compared with previous studies. None of the myocardial dysfunction types was associated with in-hospital mortality. Apical hypokinesia was also more prevalent in non-survivors despite borderline significance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document