Is Catheter Function Influenced by the Side of the Body in Which the Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter is Placed?

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cuba De La Cruz ◽  
N. Dimkovic ◽  
J.M. Bargman ◽  
S.I. Vas ◽  
D.G. Oreopoulos
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1714-1723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika A. Krezalek ◽  
Nicolas Bonamici ◽  
Kristine Kuchta ◽  
Brittany Lapin ◽  
JoAnn Carbray ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Ankur Gupta ◽  
Susan Lavoie ◽  
Brian Blew ◽  
Mohan Biyani ◽  
Brendan B. McCormick

Buried peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters are typically inserted several weeks or months before the anticipated need for dialysis. Occasionally, renal function unexpectedly stabilizes after the surgery, and a patient may go years before the catheter is needed. We report a case of successful initiation of PD with a twenty-year-old buried catheter. We outline the steps needed to optimize the catheter function and review the benefits of the buried PD catheter.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 1520-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Stone ◽  
Damien J. LaPar ◽  
John P. Barcia ◽  
Victoria F. Norwood ◽  
Daniel P. Mulloy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982093711
Author(s):  
Rebekah Tan ◽  
Weijie Weng ◽  
Warren D Raymond ◽  
Kishore Sieunarine

Aims: To compare the rates of infections (peritonitis and exit site infections) in patients undergoing non-buried versus buried peritoneal dialysis catheterisation for end-stage renal failure. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by one primary surgeon between January 2008 and August 2019. Information collected included, catheter characteristics, immediate post-operative complications, date of catheter exteriorisation, date of peritoneal dialysis commencement, rate of successful catheter function at initiation of peritoneal dialysis and rates of catheter-related complications (i.e. infection, revision status and obstruction). Results: 110 peritoneal dialysis catheters were inserted (43 non-buried and 67 buried peritoneal dialysis catheters). The non-buried group was associated with a higher proportion acquiring an infection than the buried group (15% vs 30%, p = 0.054). Patients with buried catheters also had a 72% and 65% decreased likelihood of experiencing a catheter-related infection and peritonitis, respectively, over time compared to patients with non-buried catheters in the unadjusted (crude incidence rate ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.11, 0.70; P = 0.003). The proportion of catheter function at first use was 85% in the non-buried group and 78% in the buried group. Patients with non-buried versus buried catheters had similar proportions of complications, including: obstructions (25.6% vs 20.9%, p = 0.770), herniation (7.0% vs 4.0%, p = 0.327) and leaks (7.0% vs 1.5%, p = 0.134). Conclusion: The use of the buried peritoneal dialysis catheter technique as compared to the standard technique has revealed fewer overall catheter-related infections, particularly episodes of peritonitis and similar rates of mechanical complications in our series. In addition to that, the other benefits of buried peritoneal dialysis catheters such as lower healthcare cost, patient convenience and a viable option for patients in remote communities should prompt physicians to continue assessing suitable candidates for buried peritoneal dialysis catheters.


2021 ◽  
pp. 190-194
Author(s):  
Aravindh S. Ganapathy ◽  
Myron S. Powell ◽  
James L. Pirkle

Extrusion of the superficial cuff of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter is an uncommon complication that may be associated with infection or malfunction. However, extrusion of both the superficial and deep cuffs of a double-cuff catheter is rare and uniformly associated with failure and peritonitis. We report a case of a presternal-type PD double-cuff catheter with extrusion of both cuffs through an abdominal exit site after 6 years of use that has remained functional, which has not been previously reported. In this case, the patient had achieved a 60-kg weight loss resulting in retraction of the subcutaneous tissue around both cuffs, while the catheter was held in place by the titanium connector between the presternal extension tubing and the inner, coiled catheter. In such special circumstances, extrusion of both cuffs may not necessitate urgent catheter removal. A review of the literature revealed previous cases of superficial cuff extrusions with catheters remaining functional but not with deep cuff extrusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document