Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial on the Effect of Interferon-Beta in the Treatment of Condylomata Acuminata

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Olmos ◽  
J Vilata ◽  
A Rodríguez Pichardo ◽  
A Lloret ◽  
A Ojeda ◽  
...  

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess interferon-beta efficacy and safety in the treatment of anogenital condylomatous lesions. One hundred patients received a daily intramuscular injection of either interferon-beta (IFN-β) (2 MIU/day) or placebo for 10 days. Of 94 evaluable patients, the complete response rate observed 8 weeks after treatment was significantly higher in the group receiving IFN-β, as compared to the placebo-treated group (51% vs 28.9%, P<0.05). After one year, 24 patients (100%) out of 24 complete responders to IFN-β who attended for follow-up remained free of lesions. Twelve of 13 patients with complete response to placebo (92.3%) remained free of lesions after one year. Side effects were mild and no significant analytical changes were observed. In conclusion, interferon-beta is an effective and safe treatment for long-term eradication of anogenital condylomatous lesions.

2001 ◽  
Vol 90 (02) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Walach ◽  
T Lowes ◽  
D Mussbach ◽  
U Schamell ◽  
W Springer ◽  
...  

AbstractLittle is known about long-term effects of homeopathic treatment. Following a double-blind, placebo controlled trial of classical homeopathy in chronic headaches, we conducted a 1-year observational study of 18 patients following the double-blind phase, and a complete follow-up study of all trial participants. Eighteen patients received free treatment for daily diary data (frequency, intensity, duration of headaches) over the course of 1 y. All patients enrolled in the double-blind study were sent a 6-week headache diary, a follow-up questionnaire, a personality inventory and a complaint list. Eighty-seven, of the original 98 patients enrolled returned questionnaires, 81 returned diaries. There was no additional change from the end of the trial to the one-year follow-up. The improvement seen at the end of the 12-week trial was stable after 1 y. No differential effects according to treatment after the trial could be seen. Patients with no treatment following the trial had the most improvement after 1 y. Five of 18 patients can be counted responders according to ARIMA analysis of single-case time-series. Patients with double diagnoses and longer treatment duration tended to have clearer improvements than the rest of the patients. Approximately 30% of patients in homeopathic treatment will benefit after 1 y of treatment. There is no indication of a specific, or of a delayed effect of homeopathy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Yoshinaga ◽  
Kazumi Kubota ◽  
Kensuke Yoshimura ◽  
Rieko Takanashi ◽  
Yasushi Ishida ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document