In Vitro and in Vivo Performance of Porcine Islets Encapsulated in Interfacially Photopolymerized Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Diacrylate Membranes

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Cruise ◽  
Orion D. Hegre ◽  
Francis V. Lamberti ◽  
Steven R. Hager ◽  
Ron Hill ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 426-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivan Yogev ◽  
Ayelet Shabtay-Orbach ◽  
Abraham Nyska ◽  
Boaz Mizrahi

Thermoresponsive materials have the ability to respond to a small change in temperature—a property that makes them useful in a wide range of applications and medical devices. Although very promising, there is only little conclusive data about the cytotoxicity and tissue toxicity of these materials. This work studied the biocompatibility of three Food and Drug Administration approved thermoresponsive polymers: poly( N-isopropyl acrylamide), poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(propylene glycol)-poly(ethylene glycol) tri-block copolymer, and poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) and poly(ethylene glycol) tri-block copolymer. Fibroblast NIH 3T3 and HaCaT keratinocyte cells were used for the cytotoxicity testing and a mouse model for the in vivo evaluation. In vivo results generally showed similar trends as the results seen in vitro, with all tested materials presenting a satisfactory biocompatibility in vivo. pNIPAM, however, showed the highest toxicity both in vitro and in vivo, which was explained by the release of harmful monomers and impurities. More data focusing on the biocompatibility of novel thermoresponsive biomaterials will facilitate the use of existing and future medical devices.


Biomaterials ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. Deschamps ◽  
A.A. van Apeldoorn ◽  
H. Hayen ◽  
J.D. de Bruijn ◽  
U. Karst ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 341 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 50-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoo-Kyun Choi ◽  
Myung-Kwan Chun ◽  
Se Hee Lee ◽  
Mee Hee Jang ◽  
Hee Doo Kim ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoh Kodera ◽  
Taichi Sekine ◽  
Tohru Yasukohchi ◽  
Yoshihiro Kiriu ◽  
Misao Hiroto ◽  
...  

Micromachines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Männel ◽  
Carolin Fischer ◽  
Julian Thiele

Three-dimensional (3D) printing of microfluidic devices continuously replaces conventional fabrication methods. A versatile tool for achieving microscopic feature sizes and short process times is micro-stereolithography (µSL). However, common resins for µSL lack biocompatibility and are cytotoxic. This work focuses on developing new photo-curable resins as a basis for µSL fabrication of polymer materials and surfaces for cell culture. Different acrylate- and methacrylate-based compositions are screened for material characteristics including wettability, surface roughness, and swelling behavior. For further understanding, the impact of photo-absorber and photo-initiator on the cytotoxicity of 3D-printed substrates is studied. Cell culture experiments with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in standard polystyrene vessels are compared to 3D-printed parts made from our library of homemade resins. Among these, after optimizing material composition and post-processing, we identify selected mixtures of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ethyl methacrylate (PEGMEMA) as most suitable to allow for fabricating cell culture platforms that retain both the viability and proliferation of HUVECs. Next, our PEGDA/PEGMEMA resins will be further optimized regarding minimal feature size and cell adhesion to fabricate microscopic (microfluidic) cell culture platforms, e.g., for studying vascularization of HUVECs in vitro.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document