Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS) for Cancer Pain Management

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 388-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surjya Prasad Upadhyay ◽  
Piyush N. Mallick

Cancer pain remains undertreated and a significant number of patients with cancer pain die from severe untreated pain. With increasing survival rate in cancer, the prevalence of cancer pain is also increasing in number. Though majority of patients with cancer pain can be effectively treated with conventional medical management, still a significant portion of patients required some form of interventional pain management techniques. Among the interventional techniques, intrathecal drug delivery is increasingly used in cancer pain management. Our objective of this article is to review literatures and clinical studies on intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) in cancer pain management and to provide updates on its use, precautions, contraindications, side effects and its management, socioeconomic consideration, and management of IDDS in difficult or uncommon situations.

2020 ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Po-Yi Paul Su

Background: Until the continued improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment, many cancers were once considered terminal illnesses. Opioid-based therapy is frequently utilized from the armamentarium for cancer pain treatment since the immediate goals of acute cancer pain management are focused on alleviating pain severity and improving quality of life during this limited time – despite the risks of chronic opioid therapy. However, now, with an expanding cancer survivor population, we lack guidance and tools to assist health care providers and patients in pivoting the focus of cancer pain management from acute relief toward improving function, rehabilitation, and limiting the long-term adverse effects of pain and opioid therapy. Case Report: Here, we present a case exemplifying the ability of intrathecal drug delivery systems to serve a multitude of roles during the various phases of cancer care: from treating acute cancer-related pain, acting as a tool to wean systemic opioid therapy, to being clinically dormant in situ but ready to serve again in the event of cancer recurrence. Conclusion: Intrthecal drug delivery systems are effective tools in managing acute cancer pain and can also be adapted to help manage chronic pain in cancer survivors. Key words: Cancer pain, intrathecal drug delivery system, intrathecal pump, opioid weaning


2012 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Peng Lin ◽  
Wen-Ying Lin ◽  
Feng-Sheng Lin ◽  
Yow-Shan Lee ◽  
Chuen-Shin Jeng ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robalee L Wanderman ◽  
Jonathan M Hagedorn

Abstract Cancer-related pain is progressive and therefore requires a stepwise approach to management, such as the World Health Organization’s Pain Ladder. This approach calls for increasingly strong pain medications in addition to interventional options for patients with medication-refractory pain or intolerable medication side effects. Here, we discuss a case involving cancer-related pain which ultimately required intrathecal drug delivery system placement for optimal pain management.


2012 ◽  
Vol 6;15 (6;12) ◽  
pp. 479-483
Author(s):  
Joseph Atallah

Use of antiplatelet agents is becoming increasingly common, and their management may require new strategies if neuroaxial techniques are to be employed in patients who will not tolerate discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. The patient was a 46-year-old man with a past medical history significant for coronary artery disease and who had undergone 14 stents. He developed stent thrombosis (ST) while on clopidogrel. Following the ST, he was subsequently placed on prasugrel. While on prasugrel, the patient presented for an intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) trial and placement due to severe peripheral neuropathy unresponsive to several conservative medical treatments. He had previously undergone an unsuccessful spinal cord stimulator trial and received no pain relief. In consultation with his outside cardiologist, the patient received permission to hold his prasugrel for 7 days prior to his intrathecal pump trial. During the trial period’s inpatient hospitalization, the patient developed chest pain. In consultation with the cardiology service in our institution, it was decided antiplatelet therapy should be re-instituted. The patient was bridged to his IDDS placement after the trial with intravenous eptifibatide. The eptifibatide drip was administered 6 hours prior to the IDDS implant. Functional platelet count was checked one hour before the IDDS was placed and the pump was placed without incident. The eptifibatide drip was reinstituted one hour after the IDDS implantation. The patient was observed for 24 hours on the eptifibatide drip, transitioned to his home dose of prasugrel, and discharged home. At outpatient follow-up one week later, the patient demonstrated no neurologic or hemorrhagic complications and was satisfied with the pain control provided by the IDDS. Prasugrel is an irreversible platelet inhibitor, which prevents ADP-induced platelet aggregation by binding the P2Y12 receptor. Patients taking prasugrel will have deficient platelet activity until new platelets have been produced, a span of approximately 7 days. Eptifibatide is an intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor with a short half-life of 2½ hours. Inhibition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa prevents platelet activation and aggregation. The drug effect ceases once it is discontinued and restoration of platelet function is not dependent upon new platelet production. Patients requiring antiplatelet therapy in need of neuroaxial pain management procedures present challenging problems to pain management physicians. Current guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia have not identified any bridging agent suitable for patients who may not tolerate prolonged withdrawal from their antiplatelet therapy. In this case, eptifibatide was successfully utilized to bridge a patient whose comorbid conditions necessitated continuous antiplatelet therapy without the prolonged washout common to irreversible antiplatelet agents. Key words: Intrathecal drug delivery system, anticoagulation, pain, eptifibatide, antiplatelet agents.


2019 ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Matthew Chung

A postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-described complication after implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS). Treatment is typically with supportive management with the occasional need for an epidural blood patch. We describe a case of a patient with refractory muscle spasticity secondary to cerebral palsy that required a baclofen IDDS implantation and subsequently developed a PDPH. After failing conservative therapy as well as an epidural blood patch, the decision was made to attempt an epidural fibrin patch, which transiently improved her headache. Upon return of the patient’s symptoms, computed tomography myelogram demonstrated an extensive cerebrospinal fluid leak with ventral spread into the retroperitoneal space. Using a novel technique, a second epidural fibrin glue patch was administered just adjacent to the IDDS catheter insertion point, which was then successful in resolving her symptoms. Key words: Intrathecal drug delivery system, postdural puncture headache, dural tear, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, fibrin glue, epidural blood patch


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document