Service Animals for Students With Disabilities Under IDEA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Berry ◽  
Antonis Katsiyannis
1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin E. Block

Inclusion, the philosophy of placing all children with disabilities in regular education settings, is easily the most discussed and controversial education reform issue since the 1975 passage of PL 94-142, Education of Handicapped Children Act (EHA). However, inclusion is never mentioned in the original EHA or the updated PL 101-476, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (e.g., Sherrill, 1994; Stein, 1994). What is discussed in IDEA as well as Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is the “continuum of least restrictive environments” (LRE). The purpose of this paper is to (a) review United States federal laws regarding inclusion and LRE, most notably IDEA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; (b) review recent U.S. court cases regarding inclusion and LRE including three landmark cases: Roncker v. Walter (Ohio) (1983), Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education (Texas) (1989), and Sacramento Unified School District, Board of Education v. Rachel H. (California) (1994); and (c) apply these federal laws and court decisions to physical education placement.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Pohlman ◽  
Nadine Schwab ◽  
Marsha Moses ◽  
Cynthia Gilchrest ◽  
Nadine C. Schwab

Today, school districts are challenged in meeting the health and educational needs of students with chronic health conditions. One of the challenges school districts face is determining when students with health-related disabilities are eligible for services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. This article reviews Section 504 and its regulations as they apply to public schools, particularly with respect to eligibility criteria for students with special health care needs. The article also reviews recent case law and explores the implications of these legal standards for school district practice, including the need for clear policies and procedures, consistent Section 504 teams, training, and alternatives for meeting the needs of students who are found not to be eligible for services under Section 504.


1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Pitman ◽  
John R. Slate

Investigated undergraduate and graduate college students' familiarity with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and student's attitudes concerning disabled students and their rights. Analysis of variance procedures indicated that students lacked knowledge regarding rights of disabled students. Differences existed by sex and academic status in knowledge of Section 504 and attitudes towards individuals with disabilities. Implications are discussed.


1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darin Stageberg ◽  
Jerry Fischer ◽  
Alice Barbut

The purpose of this study was to gather data about university students' familiarity with the civil rights laws pertaining to people with disabilities: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. A majority of nondisabled students and students with disabilities reported that they had little, very little, or no knowledge at all of civil rights laws pertaining to people with disabilities. In addition, a significant difference was found between the number of university students with disabilities and students without disabilities requesting accommodations from employers. Furthermore, less than 30% of the university students with disabilities in this study requested a workplace accommodation. Given the results of this research, it is recommended that university students with disabilities receive greater exposure to civil rights laws pertaining to people with disabilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document