Adherence and Persistence to Long-Acting Anticholinergics Treatment Episodes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1063-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Savaria ◽  
Marie-France Beauchesne ◽  
Amélie Forget ◽  
Lucie Blais
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Treatment Episode ◽  
Cohort Entry ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Subsequent Episode ◽  
Long Acting

Background:No studies have examined adherence or persistence to long-acting anticholinergics (LAAC) treatment episodes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objective: To estimate 1-year adherence and 5-year persistence to LAAC during treatment episodes, and the likelihood of initiating a subsequent treatment episode. Methods: A retrospective cohort of LAAC-treated COPD patients was reconstructed from Quebec databases. A treatment episode was initiated at cohort entry, defined as the first LAAC prescription date on/after the first COPD diagnosis date recorded between October 1, 2003, and March 31, 2014. We identified a subsequent treatment episode up to 5 years after the end of the episode initiated at cohort entry. We measured adherence as the proportion of days covered over 1 year. Persistence was defined as prescription renewal within 90 days of the previous prescription and was plotted using Kaplan-Meier curves over 5 years. The 5-year hazard and cumulative incidence of initiating a subsequent episode were estimated with survival analyses. We compared adherence and persistence between the treatment episodes using t and log-rank tests. Results: The cohort included 113 435 COPD patients. Adherence and persistence to LAAC were significantly lower in the subsequent treatment episode (55% vs 63%; P < 0.0001). The likelihood of initiating a subsequent episode was greatest immediately after the cessation of the initial episode, with 59% of patients starting a subsequent episode within 1 year. Conclusion: Adherence and persistence to LAAC were lower in the subsequent treatment episode. Interventions should be offered quickly after LAAC cessation.

Current opportunities of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-87
Author(s):  
I. V. Leshchenko ◽  
A. S. Meshcheryakova
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Fixed Combination ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Delivery Device ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Blood Eosinophils

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the leading cause of death in the structure of respiratory diseases. The problem of rational pharmacotherapy of COPD have attracted attention of the medical scientific society for many years. The understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease has deepened and approaches to the therapy have changed. Some COPD patients need regular fixed-combination therapy: long-acting bronchodilators (LABD) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in order to prevent exacerbations and reduce the severity of symptoms of the disease. Blood eosinophils count is one of criteria for choosing regular therapy. The appearance of fixed triple combinations of ICS/LABD increased the effectiveness of COPD therapy, and a new delivery device for fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol makes it possible to use ICS successfully in the most severe patients.

scholarly journals Costs, exacerbations and pneumonia after initiating combination tiotropium olodaterol versus triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (15) ◽  
pp. 1299-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swetha R Palli ◽  
Ami R Buikema ◽  
Mary DuCharme ◽  
Monica Frazer ◽  
Shuchita Kaila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inverse Probability ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Medicare Database

Aim: To compare health plan-paid costs, exacerbations and pneumonia outcomes for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) initiating combination tiotropium olodaterol (TIO + OLO) versus triple therapy (TT: long-acting muscarinic antagonist + long-acting β2 agonists + inhaled corticosteroid). Patients & methods: COPD patients initiating TIO + OLO or TT between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2016 were identified from a managed care Medicare database and balanced for baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting before assessment of outcomes. Results: Annual COPD-related and all-cause costs were US$4118 (35%) and US$5384 (23%) lower for TIO + OLO versus TT (both p ≤ 0.001). TIO + OLO patients had nearly half the severe exacerbations (8.3 vs 15.5%; p = 0.014) and pneumonia was also less common (18.9 vs 30.9%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: TIO + OLO was associated with improved economic and COPD health outcomes versus TT.

scholarly journals Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients electronic register analysis: the effectiveness of patient’s dynamic follow up and evaluation of treatment program

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83
Author(s):  
V Ju Mishlanov ◽  
I V Shubin ◽  
K N Bekker ◽  
A V Katkova ◽  
E P Koshurnikova
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pneumococcal Infection ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Register Analysis ◽  
Long Acting

In the last few years new informatics methods were implemented in medicine and allowed to create big data including individual clinical markers of every patient. It is suggested that clinical electronic patient’s register analysis will present accurate information about different treatment programs effectiveness, including those whose effectiveness is not still proved today. The aim of the study. To estimate the effectiveness of clinical patients register implementation as well as to analyze different treatment and prophylactic programs on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients’ structure. Materials and methods. The COPD patient’s register consists of 4257 cases. Spirometrical data were evaluated. Dynamic follow was performed on 567 COPD patients. Bronchodilator’s therapy was estimated as well as combined inhaled corticosteroid/ long acting β2-agonist medications and vaccination against pneumococcal infection. Results. Computer program “Electronic polyclinic” proposed by the authors of this article is effective in precision of diagnostic decision making in cohort study, dynamic follow up after clinical symptoms, evaluation of instrumental and laboratory results, prophylactics and treatment effectiveness, “clinical patients registers” automatic formation using syndrome or nosological principle, checking the COPD patients in the group of those with bronchial obstruction. Conclusion. Positive effects of long-acting bronchodilator treatment on COPD exacerbation decreasing and more expressed effect of inhaled corticosteroid/ long acting β2-agonists were confirmed. More interesting result was influence of vaccination against pneumococcal infection PCV13 (polyvalent conjugated vaccine) on exacerbation frequency and dyspnea severity.

scholarly journals Risk of Cardiovascular Events Associated with Inhaled Corticosteroid Treatment in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia Jing ◽  
Yufeng Li ◽  
Jianying Xu
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
And Control

Background. The cardiovascular (CV) safety of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is controversial because different studies have suggested that ICSs either increase or reduce the risk of CV events in COPD patients. In this meta-analysis, we assess the CV safety of ICS therapy in COPD. Methods. A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trials of ICS treatment for COPD that include at least 4 weeks of follow-up was performed. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the effects of ICS treatment on CV events. CV events were documented in each trial, and the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ICSs were estimated. Results. Thirty-one trials were included in this meta-analysis. The risk of CV events was not different between ICS-treated and control groups (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.06; P=0.801). In a subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences in CV events between an ICS combined with long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) (ICS + LABA) group and an LABA-only group (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.10; P=0.930), as well as between a combination group (ICS + LABA) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) combined with LABA (LAMA + LABA) group (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.55; P=0.473). In addition, there was no difference in the risk of CV events between ICS treatment and control groups (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.09; P=0.872). Conclusions. These results demonstrate that ICSs do not increase the risk of CV events in COPD patients.

scholarly journals A randomized controlled trial of long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β2 agonist fixed-dose combinations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Muraki ◽  
Yuki Kunita ◽  
Ken Shirahase ◽  
Ryo Yamazaki ◽  
Soichiro Hanada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Muscarinic Antagonist ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Β2 Agonist

Abstract Background In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, combination treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) increases forced expiratory volume in one second and reduces symptoms compared to monotherapy. In Japan, three different once-daily fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) have been prescribed since 2015, although a direct comparison of these FDCs has never been performed. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness, preference, and safety of three LAMA/LABA FDCs—glycopyrronium/indacaterol (Gly/Ind), umeclidinium/vilanterol (Ume/Vil), and tiotropium/olodaterol (Tio/Olo)—in patients with COPD. Methods We enrolled 75 COPD outpatients (male:female ratio, 69:6; 77.4 ± 6.9 years). A prospective, randomized, crossover study was conducted on three groups using three FDCs: Gly/Ind; Ume/Vil; and Tio/Olo. Each medication was administered for 4 weeks before crossover (total 12 weeks). After each FDC administration, a respiratory function test and questionnaire survey were conducted. A comparative questionnaire survey of all three LAMA/LABA FDCs was conducted after 12 weeks (following administration of final FDC). Results No significant differences in COPD Assessment Test or modified Medical Research Council dyspnea questionnaire were reported in the surveys completed after each FDC administration; no significant differences in spirometric items were observed. In the final comparative questionnaire survey, patients reported better actual feeling of being able to inhale following Gly/Ind administration compared with Tio/Olo, although no significant differences in adverse events or other evaluations were reported. Conclusions The three LAMA/LABA FDCs administered to COPD patients show similar effects and safety, although some minor individual preference was reported. Trial registration This study retrospectively registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (number UMIN000041342, registered on August 6, 2020).

scholarly journals Prescribing pathways to triple therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 175346662110010
Author(s):  
Vernon Schabert ◽  
Surbhi Shah ◽  
Ulf Holmgren ◽  
Claudia Cabrera
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Median Time ◽  
The United States ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting

Background: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend triple therapy (TT) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients based on severity. TT utilization by severity is infrequently studied in real-world settings and may deviate significantly from current clinical recommendations. This study describes prescribing pathways to TT among patients with COPD in the United States. Methods: This study analyzed Geisinger Health System electronic medical records from 1 January 2004 to 30 November 2016. Two retrospective cohorts of COPD patients were included: (1) incident COPD, and (2) incident TT users. COPD treatment patterns, including time to TT, were summarized. Time to TT was estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Predictors of the relative hazard for TT among incident COPD patients were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regressions. Results: Incident COPD and TT cohorts included 57,141 and 8173 patients, respectively. TT was used by 9.6% of incident COPD patients. In the year before TT, 34.3% of incident TT patients received treatment combinations recommended before TT according to GOLD recommendations, which mainly included: long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), long-acting beta agonists (LABAs) + LAMAs, and inhaled corticosteroids  + LABAs. Among incident TT patients, median time from COPD diagnosis to TT exceeded 2 years. The hazard for TT over time was associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s values, more frequent exacerbations, current/previous smoking, and comorbid lung conditions such as pulmonary vascular disease, acute respiratory failure, and lung cancer. About 15–20% of the incident TT patients stepped down to a one- or two-drug regimen. Median time to TT discontinuation or step-down were 2 and 9 months, respectively. Conclusion: The study has revealed discrepancies in the treatment of COPD patients between GOLD guidelines and actual clinical practices in the United States. Pathways to TT differed from recommended therapy regimes. Further studies are needed to understand barriers to the use of guideline-recommended TTs by healthcare providers. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Narrative Literature Review Guided Approach of Inhaled Corticosteroid de-escalation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110537
Author(s):  
Anamarie Tomaich ◽  
Shawnee Klatt ◽  
Michael W. Nagy
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting

Objective To review the 2020 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) report recommendations and create an algorithm to assist clinicians in determining which chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients qualify for inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) de-escalation. Data Sources: A literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed from 2002 to August 2021 was conducted using the search terms inhaled corticosteroids, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and de-escalation and review of the reference lists of identified articles for pertinent citations. Study Selection and Data Extraction Relevant studies and articles were included if they focused on the utilization of ICS in COPD. Data Synthesis The 2020 GOLD report only recommends triple therapy with ICS, long acting beta agonists, and long acting muscarinic antagonists for patients with frequent exacerbations, frequent hospitalizations, or elevated blood eosinophil counts. Despite this clear framework, patients are prescribed ICS without these characteristics. Available evidence suggests that these patients can be de-escalated from ICS therapy without concern for worsening lung function or exacerbations. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Patients with COPD may be experiencing more risk than benefit on ICS therapy. Clinicians should be knowledgeable on how to evaluate patient therapy for appropriateness and know how to safely deprescribe ICS given their limited efficacy in many COPD patients. Conclusion There remains no specific guidance on how to de-escalate patients off an ICS when the therapy is not indicated. Use of clinical evidence with stepwise algorithms can be models to approach de-escalation of ICS in patients with COPD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document