Preventing Adverse Drug Events in Hospitalized Patients

1994 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Scott Evans ◽  
Stanley L. Pestotnik ◽  
David C. Classen ◽  
Susan D. Horn ◽  
Sheron B. Bass ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To use computerized adverse drug event (ADE) surveillance to help identify methods to reduce the number of ADEs in hospitalized patients. DESIGN: Prospective study of 79 719 hospitalized patients during a 44-month period. SETTING: LDS Hospital, a 520-bed tertiary care center affiliated with the University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City. INTERVENTION: Sequential study periods of at least one year each were compared. In the first period, data were collected but not reported to physicians, pharmacists, or nurses. In the subsequent study periods, three interventions (computerized alerts of drug allergies, standardized antibiotic administration rates, and timely physician notification of all ADEs) were made to reduce the number of type B (allergic or idiosyncratic reactions) and severe ADEs. RESULTS: In the first study period, we identified 56 type B ADEs during 120 213 patient days. During two subsequent study periods that included alerts to physicians of known drug allergies and standardized antibiotic administration rates, 8 type B events were identified during 113 237 patient days and 18 during 107 868 patient days, respectively (p<0.OO2). Early notification of physicians of all confirmed ADEs regardless of severity was associated with asignificant reduction of ADEs classified as severe from 41 during 113 859 patient days in the first study period to 12 during 103 071 patient days and 15 during 108 320 patient days in two subsequent study periods, respectively (p<0.00 1). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective surveillance of computer-based medical records for known drug allergies and appropriate drug administration rates can reduce the number of type B ADEs. Early ADE detection and notification of physicians permit drug and dosage changes that reduce the progression of mild and moderate ADEs to more severe conditions.

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Hitchcock ◽  
Carlos A. Gomez ◽  
Niaz Banaei

ABSTRACTThe FilmArray GI panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT) is a multiplex, on-demand, sample-to-answer, real-time PCR assay for the syndromic diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis that has become widely adopted and, in some instances, has replaced conventional stool culture and parasite exams. Conventional testing has historically been restricted among hospitalized patients due to low diagnostic yield, but it is not known whether use of the FilmArray GI panel should be circumscribed. Cary-Blair stool samples submitted for FilmArray GI panel in adult patients admitted to an academic hospital from August 2015 to January 2017 were included in this study. Of 481 tests performed >72 h after admission, 29 (6.0%) were positive, all for a single target, excludingClostridium difficile. When follow-up tests beyond the first positive per hospitalization were excluded, 20 (4.8%) of 414 tests were positive. There was no difference in yield by immune status. Most targets detected were viral (79% of all positives [n= 23] and 70% in unique patients [n= 14]). All four cases positive for a bacterial target could not be confirmed and presentation was atypical, suggesting possible false positives. After removing potential false positives and chronic viral shedders, the yield was 3.0% (12/406). Repeat testing performed >72 h after admission and following a negative result within the first 72 h was done in 19 patients and 100% (22/22) remained negative. The FilmArray GI panel has low yield in adult patients hospitalized for >72 h, similar to conventional stool microbiology tests, and it is reasonable to restrict its use in this population.


1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley L. Pestotnik ◽  
David C. Classen ◽  
R. Scott Evans ◽  
Lane E. Stevens ◽  
John P. Burke

OBJECTIVE: To develop computerized methods to monitor and recommend dosage changes for patients treated with excessive dosages of imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) and to determine the incidence of I/C-associated seizures in our patient population. DESIGN: Prospective observational and interventional study of all patients admitted to LDS Hospital and treated with I/C from May 1, 1987, through June 30, 1991. SETTING: LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, a 520-bed, tertiary care center associated with the University of Utah School of Medicine. PATIENTS: Using a hospital information system we developed computerized algorithms to identify and monitor patients receiving I/C. These algorithms screened the computer-stored medical records of all inpatient admissions for I/C prescription orders. Computer-decision support algorithms estimated the renal function of each I/C-treated patient and provided suggestions when dosages were determined to be excessive. Additional computer-generated alerts identified patients who were receiving anticonvulsants concomitantly with I/C or whose therapy reflected dosage changes in the previous 24 hours. A list of all I/C-treated patients with alerts was reviewed daily by a clinical pharmacist and prescribing physicians were contacted if the computer-generated suggestions were clinically relevant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number and characterization of I/C-associated seizures. RESULTS: From May 1, 1987, through June 30, 1991, we prospectively monitored 107 600 patients of whom 1951 were treated with I/C. The following risk factors for I/C-associated seizures were observed in the I/C-treated population: CNS disease (6 percent), seizure disorders (0.6 percent), and abnormal renal function (70 percent). The observational and interventional methods employed in this study resulted in 79 percent of the patients receiving I/C dosages appropriate for their corresponding renal function. During the 50-month study period, we detected four seizures (0.20 percent) in the I/C-treated patients. All 4 patients were receiving I/C dosages that were excessive with respect to their renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Our rate of seizure (0.2 percent) was lower than the 1–2 percent rate reported in the literature despite the fact that more than 70 percent of the patients who received I/C had risk factors for seizure. We believe that appropriate dosing of I/C results in a low rate of associated seizures. Computer-assisted monitoring of I/C dosages in relation to renal function resulted in a reduced incidence of seizures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document