Training to Improve Communication Quality: An Efficient Interdisciplinary Experience for Emergency Department Clinicians

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily L. Aaronson ◽  
Benjamin A. White ◽  
Lauren Black ◽  
David F. Brown ◽  
Theodore Benzer ◽  
...  

Patient–provider communication has been recognized as a critical area of focus for improved health care quality, with a mounting body of evidence tying patient satisfaction and provider communication to important health care outcomes. Despite this, few programs have been studied in the emergency department (ED) setting. The authors designed a communication curriculum and conducted trainings for all ED clinical staff. Although only 72% of clinicians believed the course would be a valuable use of their time before taking it, 97% reported that it was a valuable use of their time after ( P < .001). Pre-course self-evaluation of knowledge, skill, and ability were high. Despite this, post-course self-efficacy improved statistically significantly. This study suggests that it is possible, in a brief training session, to deliver communication content that participants felt was relevant to their practice, improved their skills and knowledge, changed their attitude, and was perceived to be a valuable use of their time.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-542
Author(s):  
Teresa Janevic ◽  
Naissa Piverger ◽  
Omara Afzal ◽  
Elizabeth A. Howell

Background: Black and Latina women in New York City are twice as likely to experi­ence a potentially life-threatening morbid­ity during childbirth than White women. Health care quality is thought to play a role in this stark disparity, and patient-provider communication is one aspect of health care quality targeted for improvement. Perceived health care discrimination may influence patient-provider communication but has not been adequately explored during the birth hospitalization.Purpose: Our objective was to investi­gate the impact of perceived racial-ethnic discrimination on patient-provider com­munication among Black and Latina women giving birth in a hospital setting.Methods: We conducted four focus groups of Black and Latina women (n=27) who gave birth in the past year at a large hospital in New York City. Moderators of concordant race/ethnicity asked a series of questions on the women’s experiences and interactions with health care providers during their birth hospitalizations. One group was conducted in Spanish. We used an integrative analytic approach. We used the behavioral model for vulnerable populations adapted for critical race theory as a starting conceptual model. Two analysts deductively coded transcripts for emergent themes, using con­stant comparison method to reconcile and refine code structure. Codes were catego­rized into themes and assigned to concep­tual model categories.Results: Predisposing patient factors in our conceptual model were intersectional identities (eg, immigrant/Latina or Black/ Medicaid recipient), race consciousness (“… as a woman of color, if I am not assertive, if I am not willing to ask, then they will not make an effort to answer”), and socially assigned race (eg, “what you look like, how you talk”). We classified themes of differential treatment as impeding factors, which included factors overlooked in previ­ous research, such as perceived differential treatment due to the relationship with the infant’s father and room assignment. Themes for differential treatment co-oc­curred with negative provider communica­tion attributes (eg, impersonal, judgmental) or experience (eg, not listened to, given low priority, preferences not respected).Conclusions: Perceived racial-ethnic discrimination during childbirth influences patient-provider communication and is an important and potentially modifiable aspect of the patient experience. Interventions to reduce obstetric health care disparities should address perceived discrimination, both from the provider and patient per­spectives.Ethn Dis. 2020;30(4):533-542;doi:10.18865/ed.30.4.533


1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ò. MIRÓ ◽  
M. T. ANTONIO ◽  
S. JIMÉNEZ ◽  
A. DE DIOS ◽  
M. SÁNCHEZ ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 107755872095469
Author(s):  
Marisa Morrison ◽  
Susan Haber ◽  
Heather Beil ◽  
Katherine Giuriceo ◽  
Katherine Sapra

In 2014, Maryland incorporated global budgets into its long-running all-payer rate-setting model for hospitals in order to improve health, increase health care quality, and reduce spending. We used difference-in-differences models to estimate changes in Medicare and commercial insurance utilization and spending in Maryland relative to a hospital-based comparison group. We found slower growth in Medicare hospital spending in Maryland than in the comparison group 4.5 years after model implementation and for commercial plan members after 4 years. We identified reductions in Maryland Medicare admissions but no changes for commercial plan members, although their inpatient spending declined. Relative declines in emergency department and other hospital outpatient spending in Maryland drove slower Medicare hospital spending growth, saving $796 million. Our findings suggest global budgets reduce hospital spending and utilization but aligning incentives between hospital and nonhospital providers may be necessary to further reduce utilization and total spending.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document