Maintaining Sexual Desire and Satisfaction in Securely Bonded Couples

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry McCarthy ◽  
Lana Wald Ross

Emotion-focused therapy has made major contributions to the field of couple and marital therapy, especially with its emphasis on securely bonded couples. This conceptual/clinical article explores strategies and techniques to enhance sexual desire and satisfaction in securely bonded couples, with special attention to choosing a couple sexual style that facilitates strong, resilient desire. We advocate for both communication and integration between the fields of couple therapy and sex therapy.

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry McCarthy ◽  
Maria Thestrup

1995 ◽  
Vol 167 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Hawton

BackgroundThe treatment of sexual dysfunctions underwent a great change when sex therapy was developed more than 25 years ago. Since then the treatment programme has been modified in various ways, the response to treatment evaluated and other treatment approaches introduced.MethodA review of the literature concerning the application and outcome of sex therapy and other treatments for sexual dysfunction was conducted.ResultsThe format of effective conjoint sex therapy is now fairly clear and there is good understanding of the sexual dysfunctions that respond best to this treatment and the couples most likely to benefit. Less is known about the effects of treatment of individuals without partners, bibliotherapy and combining sex therapy with marital therapy and with physical methods of treatment.ConclusionsSex therapy is now a well-established form of treatment. It should be more widely available for patients seen in psychiatry departments.


1984 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Stone Fish ◽  
Ronald C. Fish ◽  
Douglas H. Sprenkle

1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Macphee ◽  
Susan M. Johnson ◽  
Monika M.C. van Der Veer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Likawunt Samuel Samuel ◽  
Getu Degu Alene

Abstract Background: Marital life is an important social institution that greatly influences the health and well-being of individuals and the entire society. Inherently, marriage is a complex phenomenon that the risks for marital instability are ubiquitous including social upheavals, stay home order due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID 19). Several studies have been proposed different interventions to optimize the quality of marital life. However, problems related to marital conflict are getting worse and there are uncertainties about the effectiveness of the interventions. Thus, the current systematic review was aimed at examining the effectiveness of interventions in reducing a variety of aspects of marital conflict among the cohort of married couples.Methods: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) and Qazi experimental studies describing the effectiveness of marital couple interventions published over the last 10 years were retrieved from six electronic databases using different search terms, Medical subject heading (MeSH) terms “Marital therapy”, “Couple therapy”, or “Marital couple therapy” included in this study. The risk of bias in individual studies assessed based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The effectiveness of the interventions was examined by comparing the intervention group with those who did not receive the intervention. Results: A total of 14, 536 records are searched from 6 databases, and eleven of these studies are included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. Overall, the included studies were identified to have a low risk of bias and a substantial level of heterogeneity (I2 =96%). The meta-analysis confirmed that marital couple’s interventions significantly improved marital conflict among distressed couples (Pooled effect size, -1.71, [-2.93, -0.49])Conclusions: This finding indicated that marital couples’ interventions effectively reduce marital conflict among a cohort of married couples. Thus, marital counselors and educators are strongly suggested to compile and use the interventions outline in this study. Funding: There is no source of funding, that, the authors have no competing interests to declare. Systematic review registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO: CRD42020218280


2020 ◽  
pp. 125-136
Author(s):  
Leslie Margolin

“Men’s Free Will” examines how differently sex therapy unfolds when a heterosexual male presents with the problem of low sexual desire—how heterosexual men are often treated more respectfully, more attentively, and more generously than heterosexual women. This chapter shows that for sex therapists, a man’s position in his marital orbit need not adapt to his wife’s needs. She must adapt to his. Through examination of contemporary case studies, the chapter examines how heterosexual men with low sexual desire not only present as more sexually intransigent than heterosexual women, but that their intransigence is more likely to be accepted by their spouse and therapist.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-197
Author(s):  
Susan Pacey

In the UK, psychotherapeutic treatments for sexual problems are split between couple psychoanalytic or psychodynamic psychotherapy, which focuses on the mind, and psychosexual or sex therapy, which focuses on the body, principally using the intervention “sensate focus” (Masters & Johnson, 1970). Remarkably, there are few published papers on the integration of these two approaches, indicating a near-absence of debate and perpetuating the professional bifurcation. More contributions on this topic are needed. This article provides an overview of the field (psychoanalysis and sex therapy) and presents excerpts from the author’s recent doctoral study (Pacey, 2018), using Winnicottian theories to link the two paradigms and support the integration of sensate focus into psychoanalytic couple therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document