Dedifferentiated Components Versus Well-differentiated Components in Dedifferentiated Lip sarcoma: A Comparative Study of Their Proliferative Activity and Interphase Cytogenetics Using MIB-1 Immunostaining and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization

1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Tsuji ◽  
Toshiro Fukuda ◽  
Sadafumi Tamiya ◽  
Masazumi Tsuneyoshi
2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
KRISTINE JACOBSON ◽  
ANTHONY THOMPSON ◽  
GERRY BROWNE ◽  
CHRISTINA SHASSERRE ◽  
STEVEN A. SEELIG ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Torres-Mora ◽  
Ann Moyer ◽  
Mark Topazian ◽  
Jeffrey Alexander ◽  
Tsung-Teh Wu ◽  
...  

Liposarcoma is one of the most common sarcomas in adults, but only rarely presents as an esophageal primary. There have been several reports of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL) arising in the esophagus, but we present a case of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DL) presenting as a large esophageal polyp. We believe this is the first reported case of DL of the esophagus with morphologic evidence of both well-differentiated and dedifferentiated components. The diagnosis was confirmed by demonstration of CPM gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-136
Author(s):  
Pun Yeesin ◽  
Phichaya Buasriyot ◽  
Sukhonthip Ditcharoen ◽  
Patcharaporn Chaiyasan ◽  
Chatmongkon Suwannapoom ◽  
...  

Karyotypes of four catfishes of the genus Mystus Scopoli, 1777 (family Bagridae), M. atrifasciatus Fowler, 1937, M. mysticetus Roberts, 1992, M. singaringan (Bleeker, 1846) and M. wolffii (Bleeker, 1851), were analysed by conventional and Ag-NOR banding as well as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques. Microsatellite d(GC)15, d(CAA)10, d(CAT)10 and d(GAA)10 repeat probes were applied in FISH. The obtained data revealed that the four studied species have different chromosome complements. The diploid chromosome numbers (2n) and the fundamental numbers (NF) range between 52 and 102, 54 and 104, 56 and 98, or 58 and 108 in M. mysticetus, M. atrifasciatus, M. singaringan or M. wolffii, respectively. Karyotype formulae of M. mysticetus, M. atrifasciatus, M. singaringan and M. wolffii are 24m+26sm+4a, 26m+24sm+2a, 24m+18sm+14a and 30m+22sm+6a, respectively. A single pair of NORs was identified adjacent to the telomeres of the short arm of chromosome pairs 3 (metacentric) in M. atrifasciatus, 20 (submetacentric) in M. mysticetus, 15 (submetacentric) in M. singaringan, and 5 (metacentric) in M. wolffii. The d(GC)15, d(CAA)10, d(CAT)10 and d(GAA)10 repeats were abundantly distributed in species-specific patterns. Overall, we present a comparison of cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic patterns of four species from genus Mystus providing insights into their karyotype diversity in the genus.


1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Hackel ◽  
Marileila Varella-Garcia

Interphase cytogenetics, utilizing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, has been successfully applied to diffuse and solid tissue specimens. Most studies have been performed on isolated cells, such as blood or bone marrow cells; a few have been performed on cells from body fluids, such as amniotic fluid, urine, sperm, and sputum. Mechanically or chemically disaggregated cells from solid tissues have also been used as single cell suspensions for FISH. Additionally, intact organized tissue samples represented by touch preparations or thin tissue sections have been used, especially in cancer studies. Advantages and pitfalls of application of FISH methodology to each type of specimen and some significant biological findings achieved are illustrated in this overview.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document