Effects of Information Processing Requirements on Reaction Time of the Eye

1978 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine L. Nelson ◽  
Robert M. London ◽  
Gordon H. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Reaction Time ◽  
Motor Response ◽  
Task Type ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Central Control ◽  
Control Task ◽  
Target Direction ◽  
Response Systems ◽  
Subject Differences

This experiment measured eye reaction time as a function of presence or absence of a central control task, type of command, and knowledge of target direction prior to command. It was found that eye reaction time was greater when a subject was involved in a central tracking task than when he was not; it was greater when the command was symbolic than when it was spatial; and it was longer when the target direction was unknown prior to command. These variables also interacted, so that the effect of unknown target direction was greater with a symbolic command. Results of this experiment also showed that subjects sometimes used an initial compensatory pattern of eye-head movements. There were large inter-subject differences, but use of compensation generally increased with complexity of centrally located information which required processing. It thus appears that reaction time of the eye responds to information processing variables in a manner similar to other motor response systems.

Meta-Analysis of Multiple-Task Performances: Cumulating the First two Decades of Research Findings across Studies

1993 ◽  
Vol 37 (17) ◽  
pp. 1147-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia K. Green
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Monoxide ◽  
Reaction Time ◽  
Secondary Task ◽  
Motor Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Task Type ◽  
Primary Task ◽  
External Variables ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Multiple Task

Meta-analytic procedures were used to cumulate research findings across studies of multiple-task performances published between 1965 and 1985 (inclusive). Exhaustive literature search yielded 94 reports of studies of multiple-task performances that were sufficiently detailed to be statistically combined using the Hunter-Schmidt-Jackson procedure. These studies yielded a total of 202 statistical values and a total subject N of 3091. Meta-analysis was performed overall (resulting in a significant test statistic) and then as a function of secondary task (13 types), primary task (18 types), and specific secondary-primary task combination. (The secondary tasks were Choice Reaction Time (CRT), Classification, Detection, Memory, Mental Math, Monitoring, Motor Response, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Shadowing, Speech, Task Battery (Multiple Tasks), and Tracking; the primary tasks were Association, CRT, Classification, Decision Making, Detection, Driving, Flight (Simulation), Memory, Mental Math, Monitoring, Motor Response, Problem Solving, Reading, Shadowing, Sketching, Speech, Tapping, and Tracking.) Ten external variables (Carbon Monoxide, Control-Display Compatibility, Drug Use, Feedback, Intelligence Tests, Neuroticism, Noise, Rating of Job Performance, Sinus Arrhythmia, and Temperature) as correlates of multiple-task performances were also examined. A generally positive relationship between secondary task performance alone and in combination with the primary task was found, along with moderating effects of secondary task type and primary task type. No substantial variation of results within a given combination of secondary and primary task types occurred in most cases, although four external variables (Carbon Monoxide, Feedback, Noise, and Temperature) displayed within-factor variation of results. All results were discussed in terms of integration of the past literature and directions for future research.

Evaluating Options for CRT Display of Process Trend Data

1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Koch ◽  
Thomas R. Edman ◽  
R. Kim Guenther
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Time Orientation ◽  
Load Management ◽  
Control Room ◽  
Control Task ◽  
Nuclear Control ◽  
Trend Data ◽  
Main Effects

Effectiveness of colorgraphics CRT-based process trend display formats was evaluated by manipulating time scale orientation and time directionality. Performance was assessed in terms of reaction time and accuracy in responding to questions representative of process control task scenarios. Reaction time analyses reveal no main effects of time orientation or directionality, but a reliable orientation-directionality interaction effect is present. This interaction supports the conclusion that more rapid interpretation of trend is associated with x-axis time orientation progressing away from the origin and with y-axis time orientation progressing toward the origin. Error rates were nearly equivalent among the format types and supported no further discrimination among them. The findings have implications for the design of trend displays in applications such as nuclear control room, petrochemical processing, and load management.

An Examination by Forearm EMG on Pain Reaction Time to Radiant Heat

1993 ◽  
Vol 76 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1139-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiteru Hatayama ◽  
Kayoko Shimizu
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Time Delay ◽  
Skin Temperature ◽  
Motor Response ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Radiant Heat ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Pain Sensation ◽  
Pain Thresholds ◽  
Pain Reaction

The present study was done to estimate rise in skin temperature during a pain reaction time (pain RT) as a means of investigating why a pricking pain threshold, produced by thermal stimulation using time method, often increases during repeated measurements. The pain RT, or the time-delay between occurrence of pain sensation and a subsequent motor response, was measured by making EMG recording on a forearm. The radiant heat stimuli were three, 200, 300, and 350 mcal/sec./cm2, each of which was given through a round radiation window of an algesiometer head. Analysis showed that the pain RTs would be too short to explain higher pain thresholds often found using the time method.

The Influence of Perceived Colours Over the Reaction Accuracy of Youth Tennis Players

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
Cosmin Miha Moca ◽  
Dan Mihai Gherţoiu
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Motor Response ◽  
External Stimulus ◽  
White Background ◽  
Tennis Players ◽  
Voluntary Response ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT. Introduction. Reaction is a purposeful voluntary response to an external stimulus. There is certain time period between application of external stimulus and appropriate motor response to the stimulus called the reaction time. Objectives. The aim of this paper was to determine if different colour contrasts affects the reaction time of young tennis players. Materials and Methods. The participants in this study were young tennis players (N = 10), 3 females and 7 males, with the ages between 12 to 13 years old. Results. There was a significant difference in the scores for white background (M=7.5, SD=1.51) and orange background (M=6, SD=0.81) conditions; t(9)=3.30, p = 0.009. Conclusion. Our study managed to show that a different kind of background colour can affect the reaction accuracy in identifying an object of different shape and colour than the background.

#3071 Acute escitalopram administration increases premature responding as a function of reward magnitude in healthy male volunteers

2021 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. A8-A8
Author(s):  
N Skandali ◽  
BJ Sahakian ◽  
TWR Robbins ◽  
V Voon
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Motor Response ◽  
Reaction Time Task ◽  
Serial Reaction Time Task ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Reward Processing ◽  
Test Block ◽  
Healthy Male ◽  
Serial Reaction

ObjectivesImpulsivity is a multifaceted construct that involves a tendency to act prematurely with little foresight, reflection or control. Waiting impulsivity is one aspect of action impulsivity and is commonly studied in animals using tasks such as the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT).1 It is neurochemically distinct from motor response inhibition defined as the ability to restrain or cancel a pre-potent motor response and measured with no-go and stop-signal tasks respectively.1 Serotonin modulates waiting impulsivity as decreased serotonergic transmission promotes premature responding in the rodent 5CSRT and the human analogue 4CSRT task.2 Potential mechanisms contributing to waiting impulsivity include proactive or tonic inhibition, motivational processes and sensitivity to feedback and delay.3 Higher waiting impulsivity in response to high reward cues was previously associated with greater subthalamic nucleus connectivity with orbitofrontal cortex and greater subgenual cingulate connectivity with anterior insula.4MethodsWe administered a clinically relevant dose of escitalopram (20mg) in healthy subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-groups design study and assessed its effect on waiting impulsivity using the well-validated 4CSRT task. Compared to previous studies,2 4 we added another test block with increased potential gain to assess the interaction between premature responding and reward processing. We recruited sixty-six healthy participants who completed an extensive neuropsychological test battery assessing probabilistic reversal learning, set-shifting, response inhibition, emotional processing and waiting impulsivity. Sixty participants (N=60, 26 females, 34 males) completed the 4CSRT task with N=30 in the escitalopram and N=30 in the placebo group, due to technical errors and experienced side-effects for the remaining six participants. The results of the other cognitive tasks are reported separately.5ResultsEscitalopram increased premature responding in the high incentive condition of the 4CSRT task, p=.028, t= 2.275, this effect being driven by male participants, p=.019, t=2.532 (for females, p>.05). We further show that escitalopram increased premature responses after a premature response in the same block again in male participants only, p=.034, Mann-Whitney U= 61.500. We found no correlation between premature responding in the 4CSRT task, in any test block, and the Stop-signal reaction time, the primary measure of the stop-signal task completed by the same participants (reported in [5]).ConclusionsWe show that acute escitalopram increased premature responding in healthy male participants only in high incentive conditions potentially mediated potentially through an effect on increased incentive salience. We also show that acute escitalopram increased perseverative responding thus producing a maladaptive response strategy. We show no correlation between SSRT and premature responding in the same participants consistent with these two forms of impulsivity being neurochemically and anatomically distinct. We interpret our findings in the context of acute escitalopram decreasing serotonergic transmission in some brain areas through inhibitory actions on terminal 5-HT release mediated by auto-receptors on raphe 5-HT neurons analogous to the presumed transient reduction in 5-HT activity caused by ATD.5Our findings provide further insights in the relationship of premature responding and reward processing and our understanding of pathological impulse control behaviours.References Eagle DM, Bari A, Robbins TW. The neuropsychopharmacology of action inhibition: cross-species translation of the stop-signal and go/no-go tasks. Psychopharmacology 2008;199(3):439456. Worbe Y, Savulich G, Voon V, Fernandez-Egea E, Robbins TW. Serotonin depletion induces waiting impulsivityon the human four-choice serial reaction time task: cross-species translational significance. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014;39(6):15191526. Voon V. Models of impulsivity with a focus on waiting impulsivity: translational potential for neuropsychiatric disorders. Current Addiction Reports 2014;1(4):281288. Mechelmans DJ, Strelchuk D, Doamayor N, Banca P, Robbins TW, Baek K, et al. Reward sensitivity and waiting impulsivity: shift towards reward valuation away from action control. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 2017;20(12):971978. Skandali N, Rowe JB, Voon V, Deakin JB, Cardinal RN, Cormack F, et al. Dissociable effects of acute SSRI (escitalopram) on executive, learning and emotional functions in healthy humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018;43(13):26452651.

Diffusive Feedback Influences on Hierarchical Information Processing

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 744-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Miyamoto ◽  
Jun Hasegawa ◽  
Meihong Zheng ◽  
Osamu Hoshino
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Information Processing ◽  
Reaction Time ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Cells Of Origin ◽  
Orientation Specificity ◽  
Membrane Oscillations ◽  
Reaction Speed

In visual information processing, feedforward projection from primary to secondary visual cortex (V1-to-V2) is essential for integrating combinations of oriented bars in order to extract angular information embedded within contours that represent the shape of objects. For feedback (V2-to-V1) projection, two distinct types of pathways have been observed: clustered projection and diffused projection. The former innervates V1 domains with a preferred orientation similar to that of V2 cells of origin. In contrast, the latter innervates without such orientation specificity. V2 cells send their axons to V1 domains with both similar and dissimilar orientation preferences. It is speculated that the clustered feedback projection has a role in contour integration. The role of the diffused feedback projection, however, remains to be seen. We simulated a minimal, functional V1-V2 neural network model. The diffused feedback projection contributed to achieving ongoing-spontaneous subthreshold membrane oscillations in V1 cells, thereby reducing the reaction time of V1 cells to a pair of bars that represents specific angular information. Interestingly, the feedback influence took place even before V2 responses, which might stem largely from ongoing-spontaneous signaling from V2. We suggest that the diffusive feedback influence from V2 could act early in V1 responses and accelerate their reaction speed to sensory stimulation in order to rapidly extract angular information.

Representation of tactile signals in primate supplementary motor area

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 2690-2694 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Romo ◽  
S. Ruiz ◽  
P. Crespo ◽  
A. Zainos ◽  
H. Merchant
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Decision Process ◽  
Sensory Input ◽  
Supplementary Motor Area ◽  
Motor Area ◽  
Control Task ◽  
Categorization Task ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Time Period ◽  
All Speeds

1. We have studied the neuronal activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) of two monkeys who categorized the speed of moving tactile stimuli delivered to the glabrous skin of the hand ipsilateral to the site of cortical recording and contralateral to the responding arm. 2. A large number of SMA neurons responded to the stimuli of all speeds (176 of 522) but only when those stimuli controlled behavior. 3. A second class of SMA neurons responded differentially in the categorization task (35 during the stimuli and 51 during the reaction time period) and predicted its outcome. 4. To dissociate the interrupt target switches presses from the tactile categorization responses, sixteen neurons, which responded to the stimuli in all speeds, and 11 neurons, which discharged differentially, were tested in a visual control task. None of these two classes of neurons responded in this situation. 5. It is concluded that the SMA ipsilateral to sensory input and contralateral to the responding arm is involved in the sensory decision process in this somesthetic categorization task.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document