48 Background: With an increasing number of patients receiving oral cancer therapies, evaluation of safe prescription practices, effective patient education, and toxicity monitoring of these agents is imperative. Methods: Multi-disciplinary oncology practitioners at several cancer centres in Toronto, Canada were surveyed using a web-based platform, to evaluate their prescription practices, use of patient education and symptom management tools, as well as their views on patient adherence and toxicity reporting. Results: Of 170 respondents, 43% were nurses, 34% were pharmacists, and 23% were physicians. Seventy nine percent considered patient education, medication adherence (76%), and toxicity management (78%) as “very important” components of oral chemotherapy management. Prescription methods varied: 59% of respondents used written prescriptions, 39% computerized physician order entry (CPOE), and 0% pre-printed orders, ≥50% of the time. Clinicians felt that patients report side effects from oral agents only “some of the time” (53%), and the most problematic toxicities were nausea (61%) and diarrhea (61%). Practitioners perceived the most common reasons for patient underreporting of side effects to be “fear of treatment interruption” (62%), and that “toxicities are part of the treatment” (66%). Seventy three percent of those surveyed felt individual counseling, follow-up calls (69%), and updated medication information (57%) would improve patient adherence and safety. Conclusions: A diverse group of surveyed oncology professionals expressed the importance of utilizing educational and toxicity monitoring tools for patients on oral cancer therapies, particularly as patients are thought to under-report symptoms. Prescription practices are variable, and CPOE use should be improved. The results of this survey will also be compared to a patient survey, to help develop better tools and policies to standardize practice, and improve patient adherence and toxicity management on oral cancer agents.