Clinical Review : Update on Atrial Fibrillation: Restoration of Sinus Rhythm or Ventricular Rate Control?

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Gang Li ◽  
Stefan H. Hohnloser
2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-95
Author(s):  
Ht Fung ◽  
Cw Kam

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a familiar arrhythmia seen in the emergency department and the general population. In the past it was treated in the majority of cases by controlling the ventricular rate, whether the AF is acute or chronic. However, ventricular rate control alone does not address the underlying problem and the patients still remain in AF, cardiac output and symptoms have not been optimally corrected. There is definite risk of thromboembolism. Restoration of sinus rhythm is the only way of resuming the normal conduction physiology of the heart and correcting these problems This article provides a review of the two major principles of rhythm treatment of acute AF: rate control and restoration of sinus rhythm. Transthoracic electrical cardioversion is the mainstay of treatment in haemodynamically unstable AF, whereas in stable AF, there is a choice between rate control and restoration of sinus rhythm, or they can be carried out in conjunction with each other.


1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 1052-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Balser ◽  
Elizabeth A. Martinez ◽  
Bradford D. Winters ◽  
Philip W. Perdue ◽  
Ann Wray Clarke ◽  
...  

Background Postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmia is a common complication of surgery. Because chemical cardioversion is often ineffective, ventricular rate control remains a principal goal of therapy. The authors hypothesized that patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmia after major noncardiac surgery who receive intravenous beta-adrenergic blockade for ventricular rate control would experience conversion to sinus rhythm at a rate that differs from those receiving intravenous calcium channel blockade. Methods The rate of conversion to sinus rhythm at 2 and 12 h after treatment was examined in 64 cases of postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. After adenosine administration, patients who remained in supraventricular tachyarrhythmia were prospectively randomized to receive either intravenous diltiazem or intravenous esmolol for ventricular rate control (unblinded). Loading and infusion rates were adjusted to achieve equivalent degrees of ventricular rate control. Results Patients were similar with regard to age and Apache III score. Most patients in both groups had atrial fibrillation (esmolol, 79%; diltiazem, 81%), and none experienced stable conversion with adenosine. Patients randomized to receive esmolol experienced a 59% rate of conversion to sinus rhythm within 2 h of treatment, compared with only 33% for patients randomized to receive diltiazem (intention to treat, P = 0.049; odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.046 to 7.8). After 12 h of therapy, the number of patients converting to sinus rhythm increased in both groups (esmolol, 85%; diltiazem, 62%), and the rates of conversion no longer differed significantly. Ventricular rates when supraventricular tachyarrhythmia began and after 2 and 12 h of rate control therapy were similar in the two treatment groups. The in-hospital mortality rate and length of stay in the intensive care unit were not significantly influenced by treatment group. Conclusions Among adenosine-resistant patients in the intensive care unit with atrial fibrillation after noncardiac surgery, intravenous esmolol produced a more rapid (2-h) conversion to sinus rhythm than did intravenous diltiazem.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-110
Author(s):  
Md Zahid Alam ◽  
Pranob Karmaker ◽  
Rowsan Ara ◽  
Monzoor Quader ◽  
MM Zahurul Alam Khan ◽  
...  

We report a case of atrial fibrillation (AF) of unknown duration with fast ventricular rate which was refractory to intravenous (i.v.) digoxin, verapamil and DC (direct current) shock regarding rate control. Amiodarone was given in bolus & then in maintenance dose which ultimately controlled the rate and finally converted into sinus rhythm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmed.v21i2.13622 Bangladesh J Medicine 2010; 21: 108-110


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Pragnesh Parikh ◽  
◽  
KL Venkatachalam ◽  

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia noted in clinical practice and its incidence and prevalence are on the rise. The single most important intervention is the evaluation and treatment of stroke risk. Once the risk for stroke has been minimized, controlling the ventricular rate and treating symptoms become relevant. In this review article, we emphasize the importance of confirming and treating the appropriate arrhythmia and correlating symptoms with rhythm changes. Furthermore, we evaluate some of the risk factors for AF that independently result in symptoms, underlining the need to treat these risk factors as part of symptom control. We then discuss existing and novel approaches to rate control in AF and briefly cover rhythm control methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document