scholarly journals Effectiveness of adjuvant carboplatin-based chemotherapy compared to cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
Valérie Couillard-Montminy ◽  
Pierre-Yves Gagnon ◽  
Sebastien Fortin ◽  
Jimmy Côté
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Background Cisplatin and vinorelbine given intravenously is a well-established adjuvant chemotherapy regimen after surgery for early non-small cell lung cancer. However, few validated alternatives exist when cisplatin is not indicated or tolerated. Carboplatin is frequently used in this setting. We evaluated the 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival and toxicity in patients treated for stage IB to IIIB resected non-small cell lung cancer receiving adjuvant carboplatin-based chemotherapy compared to cisplatin in association with vinorelbine. Methods Single-center retrospective study of patients having received adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2004 and December 2013 at the oncology clinic at Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (Canada). Three sub-groups, cisplatin/vinorelbine, carboplatin/vinorelbine and the substitution of cisplatin/vinorelbine for carboplatin/vinorelbine (cisplatin/vinorelbine/carboplatin/vinorelbine), were studied during treatment. Results One hundred twenty-seven patients were included in this study. The median PFS was not significantly different, with 50.4 months for cisplatin/vinorelbine, 57.3 months for cisplatin/vinorelbine/carboplatin/vinorelbine and not yet achieved for the carboplatin/vinorelbine group ( p = 0.80). Overall survival also did not differ significantly between the three groups. The 5-year overall survival rates were 66% in cisplatin/vinorelbine group, 55% in carboplatin/vinorelbine group and 70% in cisplatin/vinorelbine/carboplatin/vinorelbine group ( p = 0, 95). No differences were noted between groups concerning high-grade hematologic toxicity. Conclusions Although the effectiveness and hematologic toxicity are comparable between cisplat in and carboplatin in the adjuvant treatment of resected non-small cell lung cancer, the results obtained corroborate the practice used at our oncology clinic. Nevertheless, more prospective studies would be needed to confirm these results.

scholarly journals Clinical outcome and side effects of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: Our experiences

2021 ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
Bojan Radojicic ◽  
Marija Radojicic ◽  
Miroslav Misovic ◽  
Dejan Kostic
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Free Survival

Background/Aim. About 1.8 million new lung cancer cases are diagnosed in the world every year, and about 1.6 million cases are with fatal outcome. Despite improvements in treatment in previous decades, the survival of patients with lung cancer is still poor. The five-year survival rate is about 50% for patients with localized disease, 20% for patients with regionally advanced disease, 2% for patients with metastatic disease, and about 14% for all stages. The median survival of patients with untreated NSCLC in the advanced stage is four to five months and the annual survival rate is only 10%. The main goal of the research is to obtain and analyze the results of treatment with concomitant chemotherapy in terms of its efficacy and toxicity in selected patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Methods. The study included data analysis of 31 patients of both sexes who were diagnosed and pathohistologically verified with NSCLC in inoperable stage III and were referred by the Council for Malignant Lung Diseases to the Radiotherapy Department of the Military Medical Academy for concomitant chemoradiotherapy treatment. Upon expiry of the three-month period from the performed radiation treatment, the tumor resonance was assessed on the basis of MSCT examination of the chest and upper abdomen according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). According to the same criteria, progression-free survival (PFS) was also assessed every three months during the first two years, then every 6 months or until the onset of disease symptoms, as well as overall survival (OS). Result. The median progression-free survival is 13 months, and the median overall survival is 20 months. During and immediately after RT, 9 (29%) patients had a grade 2 or higher adverse event. Conclusion. The use of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients in the third stage of locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer provides a good opportunity for a favorable therapeutic outcome, with an acceptable degree of acute and late toxicity, and represents the standard therapeutic approach for selected patients in this stage of the disease.

Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (27) ◽  
pp. 2045-2058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Jin Kim ◽  
Mark Oremus ◽  
Helen H Chen ◽  
Thomas McFarlane ◽  
Devanshi Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival

Background: The effectiveness of immunotherapies for non-small-cell lung cancer under real-world clinical settings remains uncertain. Materials & methods: Systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were conducted. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled median overall survival and progression-free survival estimates. Results: 36 studies of nivolumab were included for narrative synthesis and 11 of these studies were included for meta-analysis. Age, sex, histology and prior lines of treatment did not affect survival outcomes, while Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and brain metastasis were inversely associated with survival. In the meta-analysis, nivolumab was associated with 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.4–10.9) of overall survival and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.6–3.6) of progression-free survival. Conclusion: Very-low-certainty evidence suggested the real-world effectiveness of nivolumab was consistent with those observed in the clinical trials.

C/EBPα expression by immunohistochemistry lacks prognostic or predictive significance in primary resected non-small cell lung cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7202-7202
Author(s):  
D. B. Costa ◽  
P. Stephenson ◽  
O. Kocher ◽  
D. G. Tenen ◽  
R. H. Feins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Resected Nsclc ◽  
Thoracic Radiation

7202 Background: The transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) is down-regulated in a majority of lung cancers. We sought to determine if C/EBPα could be a prognostic or predictive factor in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Our cohort originated from ECOG 3590/4592 (randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant therapy with thoracic radiation or cisplatin and etoposide plus thoracic radiation in patients with completely resected stages II and IIIA NSCLC; and its laboratorial study). 166 tumor samples contained material for immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of C/EBPα expression. We used a scoring system comparing tumor staining to that of basal bronchial cells (3+). 0 or 1+ (weak) staining suggested lack of, while 2 or 3+ (strong) suggested C/EBPα expression. Our primary outcomes were differences in progression-free and overall survival between the groups with weak or strong staining. Results: Among the 166 patients analyzed for C/EBPα IHC, the median progression free and overall survival were 30.7 and 40.3 months, respectively; which do not differ from the complete E4592 cohort. 92 patient samples (55%) had 0 or 1+ staining, and the remaining 74 (45%) 2 or 3+. The median progression free survival for patients with weak and strong C/EBPα IHC expression was 31.5 and 30.2 months, respectively (p = 0.84). The median overall survival between the weak and strong groups was 47.5 and 38.3 months, respectively (p = 0.54). 10 years after enrollment, 27% (25/92) of patients were alive in the weak, and 24% (18/74) in the strong C/EBPα IHC group. No difference between our primary outcomes by C/EBPα expression was identified. There was no difference in outcome by treatment arm, tumor histology, stage, or patient’s characteristics. There was a trend towards loss of C/EBPα and less differentiated tumor samples (p = 0.07). Conclusions: C/EBPα is a novel tumor suppressor gene in lung cancer with loss of expression in over 50% of NSCLC. However, our data demonstrate that in a subset of patients with resected NSCLC, C/EBPα IHC status is neither a prognostic nor a predictive marker. Further studies are needed to establish the molecular mechanisms of C/EBPα inactivation in lung cancer and its possible role as a new therapeutic target. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Irinotecan (I), carboplatin (C), and radiotherapy (RT) followed by maintenance bevacizumab (B) in the treatment (tx) of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC): Update of a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7085-7085 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Patton ◽  
D. R. Spigel ◽  
F. A. Greco ◽  
W. H. Liggett ◽  
J. D. Zubkus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Colon Perforation ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Ecog Ps

7085 Background: Targeting VEGF has proven to be an effective tx strategy in many solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer. VEGF expression in SCLC provides rationale for studying B in addition to chemoradiotherapy. Methods: The endpoints of this multicenter community-based study were to assess the safety, response rate (RR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of I/C/RT followed by B in patients (pts) with LS-SCLC. Tx included: C AUC = 5 IV D1, I 50mg/m2 IV D1,8 Q 21D x 4 cycles, and RT 1.8 Gy daily to a total of 61.2 Gy, beginning with the 3rd cycle. 3rd and 4th cycles were 28D each. Pts were restaged after 4 cycles. If no progressive disease (PD) pts received B 10 mg/kg IV Q 14D x 10 doses. Eligibility included: measurable disease, ECOG PS 0–1, informed consent, and no new brain metastases or bleeding. Results: Fifty-seven pts were enrolled from 8/03 to 10/04. Forty-five pts (79%) and 41 pts (72%) received planned tx with I/C/RT and B, respectively. The range of follow-up is 14–28 months. Baseline features: median age 65 years (42–80); male/female, 37%/63%; ECOG PS 0,1: 26%/74%. Grade (G) 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity: diarrhea (9%), DVT (4%), vomiting (11%), and fatigue (9%). G3/4 hematologic toxicity: neutropenia (37%), anemia (5%), and thrombocytopenia (13%). Only 9% of pts experienced G3/4 toxicity during B tx (1 pt each: DVT, hypokalemia, depression, pain, and colon perforation). There were 2 tx-related deaths (both from respiratory failure; 1 and 2 doses of B had been administered). Complete/partial responses were observed in 15 pts (26%)/31 pts (54%), respectively, for an overall RR of 80% (95% CI 70%-90%). Four pts had stable disease, and 5% had PD (4 pts were unevaluable.) 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 63% and 54%, respectively. 1- and 2- year overall survival (OS) rates were 71% and 29%, respectively. Median OS was 15 months. Conclusions: The safety, RR, and 1- and 2-year survival results of I/C/RT followed by B compare favorably with standard tx for LS-SCLC; and B may improve PFS. Assessing the role of B as maintenance tx in improving OS in this setting will require randomized trials. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document