scholarly journals Join In . . . and Drop Out? Firm Adoption of and Disengagement From Voluntary Environmental Programs

2021 ◽  
pp. 108602662110112
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Callery
Keyword(s):  
Drop Out ◽  
Program Participation ◽  
Participation Rates ◽  
Environmental Programs ◽  
Voluntary Environmental Programs ◽  
Program Adoption ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
Commitment Mechanisms ◽  
Expected Benefits ◽  
Regulatory Mandates

Voluntary environmental programs (VEPs) offer opportunities for companies and stakeholders to improve environmental outcomes valued by society in the absence of regulatory mandates. Research has addressed numerous antecedents for firm adoption of VEPs, enhancing knowledge of how stakeholders and firms engage on substantive issues of public importance. However, program adoption is dynamic, and stagnant participation rates may threaten program longevity when firms do not realize expected benefits. Prior literature has not sufficiently addressed the factors that compel firms to drop out. In this study I articulate three consequential drivers of firm commitment to VEPs—transparency, effort, and achievement—and empirically estimate their effects on firm disengagement from one such prominent program: CDP (formerly known as Carbon Disclosure Project). Findings indicate that firm transparency and effort represent powerful commitment mechanisms driving continued program participation. This study contributes to theory over multiple literatures related to VEP participation and offers practical guidance for both VEPs and firms.

Why Do Firms Participate in Voluntary Environmental Programs? A Meta-Analysis of the Role of Institutions, Resources, and Program Stringency

2021 ◽  
pp. 108602662199006
Author(s):  
Peter Tashman ◽  
Svetlana Flankova ◽  
Marc van Essen ◽  
Valentina Marano
Keyword(s):  
Quality Management ◽  
Prior Experience ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Institutional Pressures ◽  
Environmental Programs ◽  
Voluntary Environmental Programs ◽  
Management Standards ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
The Impact

We meta-analyze research on why firms join voluntary environmental programs (VEPs) to assess the impact of program stringency, or the extent to which they have rigorous, enforceable standards on these decisions. Stringency creates trade-offs for firms by affecting programs’ effectiveness, legitimacy, and adoption costs. Most research considers singular programs and lacks cross program variation needed to analyze program stringency’s impact. Our meta-analysis addresses this by sampling 127 studies and 23 VEPs. We begin by identifying common institutional and resource-based drivers of participation in the literature, and then analyze how program stringency moderates their impacts. Our results suggest that strictly governed VEPs encourage participation among highly visible and profitable firms, and discourage it when informal institutional pressures are higher, and firms have prior experience with other VEPs or quality management standards. We demonstrate that VEP stringency has nuanced effects on firm participation based on the institutional and resource-based factors facing them.

Evaluating the Sustainability of Urban Food Recovery Programs: A Quantitative Assessment in Chicago

2021 ◽  
pp. 036119812110357
Author(s):  
Junjun Zheng ◽  
Ning Ai
Keyword(s):  
Food Waste ◽  
Transportation Cost ◽  
Program Participation ◽  
Neighborhood Characteristics ◽  
Participation Rates ◽  
Sustainable Food ◽  
Recovery Programs ◽  
Transport Services ◽  
Industrial Sectors ◽  
Negative Impacts

This study demonstrates the critical need for strategic transportation planning for sustainable food waste management in urban regions. The majority of food waste is generated from non-industrial sectors (i.e., residential, commercial, and institutional sectors that cluster in cities), while over two-thirds of discarded food could have been edible. Food recovery programs (FRPs) can help reduce food wastage, avoid the negative impacts of landfill disposal, and mitigate food insecurities. Notably, FRPs shift long-haul waste transport services destined for a central landfill location to local, short, and time-sensitive pick-up and delivery trips, which have not been carefully studied. This study quantifies the economic efficiency (i.e., cost) and environmental impact (i.e., emissions) of urban FRP scenarios by incorporating the characteristics of surplus food pick-up options, fleet, urban built environment, and donor program participation rates. The results of an empirical study in Chicago, U.S., show that urban FRPs can be both economically efficient and environmentally beneficial, although the preferred strategy for FRPs may vary by neighborhood characteristics. With strategic planning and management, the transportation cost could be as low as $ 0.06/lb of recovered food. Meanwhile, diverting 1 ton of edible food from landfills, on average, reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 97%, or 0.51 MTCO2e. If the estimated volume of 10,000 tons of surplus food in Chicago can be fully recovered, the regional net emission reduction can reach 5,100 MTCO2e, which is equivalent to removing 1,110 vehicles from the roads. This study is anticipated to provide planning insights into initiating and scaling up city-wide FRPs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document