A Community-Based, Environmental Chronic Disease Prevention Intervention to Improve Healthy Eating Psychosocial Factors and Behaviors in Indigenous Populations in the Canadian Arctic

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 592-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin L. Mead ◽  
Joel Gittelsohn ◽  
Cindy Roache ◽  
André Corriveau ◽  
Sangita Sharma
2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 955-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim D. Raine ◽  
Ronald Plotnikoff ◽  
Donald Schopflocher ◽  
Ellina Lytvyak ◽  
Candace I.J. Nykiforuk ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e106
Author(s):  
Kim Raine ◽  
Ron Plotnikoff ◽  
Donald Schopflocher ◽  
Ellina Lytvyak ◽  
Candace I. Nykiforuk ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. NP155-NP157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam G. Gavarkovs ◽  
Shauna M. Burke ◽  
Kristen C. Reilly ◽  
Robert J. Petrella

Chronic disease is becoming increasingly prevalent in Canada. Many of these diseases could be prevented by adoption of healthy lifestyle habits including physical activity and healthy eating. Men, especially those in rural areas, are disproportionately affected by chronic disease. However, men are often underrepresented in community-based chronic disease prevention and management (CDPM) programs, including those that focus on physical activity and/or healthy eating. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of program delivery staff regarding the challenges in recruitment and participation of men in physical activity and healthy eating programs in rural communities, and suggestions for improvement. Semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone with 10 CDPM program delivery staff from rural communities in Southwest Ontario, Canada. Time and travel constraints, relying on spouses, and lack of male program leaders were cited as barriers that contributed to low participation levels by men in CDPM programs. Hiring qualified male instructors and engaging spouses were offered as strategies to increase men’s participation. The results of this study highlight many of the current issues faced by rural health organizations when offering CDPM programming to men. Health care organizations and program delivery staff can use the recommendations in this report to improve male participation levels.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Ryan Carson ◽  
Caroline Carr ◽  
Graeme Kohler ◽  
Lynn Edwards ◽  
Rick Gibson ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 443-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Goodman ◽  
Fran C. Wheeler ◽  
Peter R. Lee

Purpose. To present an evaluation of a 5-year, community-based, chronic disease prevention project managed by a state health department to determine whether the department could replicate similar previous projects that had received more funding and other resources. Design. The evaluation used a matched comparison design and a review of archive and interview data. Setting. Florence, South Carolina (population: 56,240). Subjects. A random sample of 1642 persons in Florence (and 1551 in the comparison) who responded to a risk factor questionnaire and underwent a physical assessment; 70. 7% of baseline subjects participated in the postintervention. Forty key persons were interviewed concerning project effectiveness. Interventions by Project. Walk-a-thons, a speakers' bureau, media messages, restaurant food labeling, and cooking seminars. More than 31,000 participants were involved in 585 activities. Measures. Questionnaires focused on hypertension, obesity, high cholesterol, smoking, and exercise. Physical assessments determined lipid, lipoprotein, apolipoprotein, and blood pressure levels. Analysis of covariance was used for baseline and postintervention comparisons. Content analysis was used on archive and interview data. Results. The project had a slightly favorable intervention effect on cholesterol and smoking, but failed to have an effect on other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The project influenced community awareness, enlisted influential community members, and fostered linkages among local health services. Conclusions. Health departments can be instrumental in community risk reduction programming; however, they may not replicate projects having greater resources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document