Assessment of Chronic Disease Management Strategies Among Health Care Practices in Medically Underserved South Carolina Counties

2021 ◽  
pp. 109019812110575
Author(s):  
Jennifer Mandelbaum ◽  
Kristian G. Myers ◽  
Courtney L. Brightharp ◽  
Shauna P. Hicks

Diabetes and heart disease are among the leading causes of death and disability in the United States, and these conditions are especially prevalent in the South. South Carolina’s persistent racial and socioeconomic disparities in chronic disease outcomes are well-documented, yet little is known about how health care practices in medically underserved areas are addressing these challenges. Data were collected through a cross-sectional survey as part of two complementary 5-year cooperative agreements between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Division of Diabetes and Heart Disease Management (the Division) at the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. The Division fielded a survey to (a) assist in determining which Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) were best poised to implement specific strategies as part of these cooperative agreements and (b) provide data to establish the baseline for performance measures. FQHCs and RHCs in the top 25% of counties with the highest diabetes and heart disease burden were surveyed about eight domains: staffing/services, electronic health records, team-based care policies, lifestyle change programs, medication therapy management, telehealth, quality improvement collaboratives, and patient demographics. Data representing 71 practices revealed contrasts between RHCs and FQHCs and opportunities for improvement. For example, while most practices reported they were not implementing evidence-based lifestyle change programs (e.g., the National Diabetes Prevention Program), most RHCs and FQHCs expressed interest in starting such programs. Findings are being used to guide efforts to improve diabetes and heart disease prevention and management in South Carolina.

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Geist-Martin ◽  
Catherine Becker ◽  
Summer Carnett ◽  
Katherine Slauta

The big island of Hawaii has been named the healing island – a place with varied interpretations of healing, health, and a wide range of holistic health care practices. This research explores the perspectives of holistic providers about the communicative practices they believe are central to their interactions with patients. Intensive ethnographic interviews with 20 individuals revealed that they perceive their communication with clients as centered on four practices, specifically: (a) reciprocity – a mutual action or exchange in which both the practitioner and patient are equal partners in the healing process; (b) responsibility – the idea that, ultimately, people must heal themselves; (c) forgiveness – the notion that healing cannot progress if a person holds the burden of anger and pain; and (d) balance – the idea that it is possible to bring like and unlike things together in unity and harmony. The narratives revealed providers’ ontological assumptions about mind-body systems and the rationalities they seek to resist in their conversations with patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2455328X2199571
Author(s):  
Manisha Thapa ◽  
Pinak Tarafdar

In all cultures and regions, the concept of health varies, based on the type of environment and prevalent sociocultural traditions. The present study is conducted among the Lepchas of the village of Lingthem divided into two sectors—Upper and Lower Lingthem, Upper Dzongu, North Sikkim. This population comprising Buddhist Lepchas residing away from the mainstream through poor infrastructural facilities still maintain ethnomedical health care practices without influence of major Indian healing systems. Living in the area of Dzongu exclusively inhabited by Lepchas revival of ancient cultural practices is evident among Lepchas of Lingthem. The structure of religious beliefs prevalent among the Lepchas, including traditional animistic as well as Buddhist practices, greatly influence forms of treatment sought for specific ailments. Even today, the use and maintenance of traditional health care with syncretized Buddhist religious belief among residents of Lingthem act as a vital source for understanding the influence of religion on traditional health care practices. Despite the presence of a few modern health care agencies, the traditional treatment of Bongthing (Lepcha shaman) and Buddhist monks remain widely popular as primary means of health care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document