Public Input Provision, Tax Base Mobility, and External Ownership

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 754-776
Author(s):  
Mutsumi Matsumoto

This article investigates the distortionary impacts of tax base mobility and external ownership on public input provision. Regional governments compete for mobile tax bases (e.g., business capital). The impact of regional public policy partially accrues to non-residents because immobile factors (e.g., business land) are subject to external ownership. This article derives an optimal rule for regional public input provision that illustrates how these two distortionary impacts depend on the nature of production functions. The impact of external ownership is particularly complex. To explore this impact in detail, the case of production functions with constant elasticity of substitution is examined. Public inputs with different productivity impacts yield fairly different implications of external ownership for inefficient public input provision.

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-76
Author(s):  
Rainer Klump ◽  
Anne Jurkat

In this paper, we examine the influence of monetary policy on the speed of convergence in a standard monetary growth model à la Sidrauski allowing for differences in the elasticity of substitution between factors of production. The respective changes in the rate of convergence and its sensitivities to the central model parameters are derived both analytically and numerically. By normalizing the constant elasticity of substitution (CES) production functions both outside the steady state and within the steady state, it is possible to distinguish between an efficiency and a distribution effect of a change in the elasticity of substitution. We show that monetary policy is the more effective, the lower is the elasticity of substitution, and that the impact of monetary policy on the speed of convergence is mainly channeled via the efficiency effect.


1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1174-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Nautiyal ◽  
B. K. Singh

Derived demand for roundwood created by the three major forest-products industries in Ontario from 1952 to 1980 was estimated from the production functions of the industries. The Cobb–Douglas function represents the lumber and the veneer and plywood industries, and the constant elasticity of substitution (CES) function represents the pulp and paper industry. In all three industries, the derived demand for roundwood is price inelastic. A theorem that the sum of partial price elasticities of derived demand when output of the final product is held constant is equal to zero has been proved. Demand by the lumber industry showed regular fluctuations throughout the 29-year period of study, while that by the other two industries rose steadily except for a few slumps.


2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 694-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Nakamura ◽  
Masakatsu Nakamura

We consider endogenous changes of inputs from labor to capital in the production of intermediate goods, i.e., a form of mechanization. We derive complementary relationships between capital accumulation and mechanization by assuming a Cobb–Douglas production function for the production of final goods from intermediate goods. A constant-elasticity-of-substitution production function in which the elasticity of substitution exceeds unity can be endogenously derived as the envelope of Cobb–Douglas production functions when the efficiency of inputs is assumed in a specific form. The difficulty of mechanization represents the elasticity of substitution.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander A. Shananin ◽  
Anastasiya V. Rassokha

Abstract The article proposes a modification of the approach to the analysis of inter-industry balance. Instead of linear models of inter-industry balance, based on the hypothesis of W. Leontief about the constancy of the cost standards of production factors, the article studies nonlinear models. For the case of production functions with constant elasticity of substitution (CES) an algorithm for solving the inverse problem is proposed, which allows to identify the model of nonlinear inter-industry balance based on the data of the symmetric input-output table. Based on the Young transform and Fennel duality, with the help of this model, we develop a technology for analyzing inter-industry relationships. The technology has been tested on the data of economic statistics of Russia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 104-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berthold Herrendorf ◽  
Christopher Herrington ◽  
Ákos Valentinyi

We assess how the properties of technology affect structural transformation, i.e., the reallocation of production factors across the broad sectors of agriculture, manufacturing, and services. To this end, we estimate sectoral constant elasticity of substitution (CES) and Cobb-Douglas production functions on postwar US data. We find that differences in technical progress across the three sectors are the dominant force behind structural transformation whereas other differences across sectoral technology are of second-order importance. Our findings imply that Cobb-Douglas sectoral production functions that differ only in technical progress capture the main technological forces behind the postwar US structural transformation. (JEL E16, E25, O33, O47)


2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bang-Yen Chen

Almost all economic theories presuppose a production function, either on the firm level or the aggregate level. In this sense the production function is one of the key concepts of mainstream neoclassical theories. There is a very important class of production functions that are often analyzed in both microeconomics and macroeonomics; namely, $h$-homogeneous production functions. This class of production functions includes two important production functions; namely, the generalized Cobb-Douglas production functions and ACMS production functions. It was proved in 2010 by L. Losonczi \cite{L} that twice differentiable two-inputs $h$-homogeneous production functions with constant elasticity of substitution (CES) property are Cobb-Douglas' and ACMS production functions. Lozonczi also pointed out in \cite{L} that his proof does not work for production functions of $n$-inputs with $n>2$


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document