scholarly journals Survival Study of Triple-Negative and Non–Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in a Brazilian Cohort

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117955491879056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Homero Gonçalves ◽  
Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra ◽  
Jane Rocha Duarte Cintra ◽  
Vívian Assis Fayer ◽  
Igor Vilela Brum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Node Involvement ◽  
Brazilian Cohort ◽  
Disease Free

Objective: To analyze the clinical, pathological, and sociodemographic aspects between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC in a Brazilian cohort and identify potential prognostic factors. Methods: This hospital-based retrospective cohort study included 447 women with breast cancer treated at referral centers in Southeastern Brazil. Overall and disease-free survival were compared; prognostic factors were evaluated. Results: Triple-negative breast cancer corresponded to 19.5% of breast cancer diagnosis and was more prevalent among nonwhite and less educated women. The patients with TNBC tended to present with stage III cancer, high p53 expression, lymphocytic infiltration, and multifocality and treated with radical surgery and chemotherapy. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 62.1% and 57.5% for TNBC and 80.8% and 75.3% for non-TNBC, respectively ( P < .001). The TNBC recurrence was associated with multicentricity, whereas lymph node involvement increased the risk of both recurrence and death. Non-TNBC worse clinical course was associated with nonwhite ethnicity, lower education level, lymph node involvement, and advanced stage. Conclusions: Triple-negative breast cancer exhibited a more aggressive behavior, earlier and more frequent recurrence, and worse survival compared with non-TNBC. While biological and social variables were associated with poorer prognosis in non-TNBC, only lymph node involvement and multicentricity were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in TNBC.

Triple-negative and non–triple-negative breast cancer in a south Indian cohort.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13110-e13110
Author(s):  
Narayanankutty Edavalath Warrier ◽  
Uma V Sankar ◽  
Sreedharan P S ◽  
Ajmal Sherif
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Rural Women ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Node Involvement ◽  
Disease Free

e13110 Background: The heterogeneity of breast cancer explains in part the differences in the morbidity and mortality of this disease. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a specific subset of tumors characterized by the absence of the 3 most commonly targeted biomarkers considered for breast cancer treatment: Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2). TNBC accounts for 15% to 20% of all breast cancer diagnoses and usually has a more aggressive clinical course, with worse evolution within the first 3 to 5 years after diagnosis; early and higher rates of distant recurrences, typically visceral; and poor survival. Methods: To analyze the clinical, pathological, and sociodemographic aspects between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC in a Kerala cohort and identify potential prognostic factors. This hospital-based retrospective cohort study (From January 2017 till December 2018) included 465 women with breast cancer treated at MVR Cancer Centre & Research Institute in North Kerala. Overall and disease-free survival was compared; prognostic factors were evaluated. Results: Triple-negative breast cancer corresponded to 16.3% of breast cancer diagnosis and was more prevalent among rural women. The patients with TNBC tended to present with stage III cancer, high p53 expression, lymphocytic infiltration, and multifocality and treated with radical surgery and chemotherapy. The 2-year overall and disease-free survival were 52.1% and 43.5% for TNBC and 83.8% and 73.4% for non-TNBC, respectively ( P < .001). The TNBC recurrence was associated with multicentricity, whereas lymph node involvement increased the risk of both recurrence and death. Non-TNBC worse clinical course was associated with rural women, younger age, lymph node involvement, and advanced stage. Conclusions: Triple-negative breast cancer exhibited a more aggressive behavior, earlier and more frequent recurrence, and worse survival compared with non-TNBC. While biological and social variables were associated with poorer prognosis in non-TNBC, only lymph node involvement and multicentricity were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in TNBC.

Development of prognostic nomograms using institutional data for patients with triple-negative breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie-Yu Zhou ◽  
Kang-Kang Lu ◽  
Wei-Da Fu ◽  
Hao Shi ◽  
Jun-Wei Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Discriminative Ability ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease. Nomograms can predict prognosis of patients with TNBC. Methods: A total of 745 eligible TNBC patients were recruited and randomly divided into training and validation groups. Endpoints were disease-free survival and overall survival. Concordance index, area under the curve and calibration curves were used to analyze the predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of nomograms. Results: Based on the training cohort, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, positive lymph nodes, tumor size and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were used to construct a nomogram for disease-free survival. In addition, age was added to the overall survival nomogram. Conclusion: The current study developed and validated well-calibrated nomograms for predicting disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with TNBC.

scholarly journals Serum cyfra21-1 associated with biological aggressiveness and poor prognosis in male patients with urothelial carcinoma of bladder.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haitao Liang ◽  
Yunlin Ye ◽  
Zhu Lin ◽  
Zikun Ma ◽  
Lei Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymphovascular Invasion ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Node Involvement ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma Of Bladder

Abstract Background : To assess the prognostic value of preoperative serum cyfra21-1 in male patients with urothelial carcinoma of bladder treated with radical cystectomy.Methods: Patients underwent radical cystectomy from 2009-2018 at our center were retrospectively analyzed and 267 male patients met our criterions. The median follow-up was 34 months. The serum level of cyfra21-1 was measured using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were divided into two groups (cyfra21-1≤3.30ng/ml and cyfra21-1>3.30 ng/ml). Clinical significance of cyfra21-1 level was assessed.Results: Of the 267 patients, 110 (41.2%) had normal cyfra21-1, while 157 (58.8%) had elevated serum cyfra21-1. The prevalence of lymph node involvement, locally advanced stage (≥ pT3), tumor stages, tumor size and papillary were significantly higher in patients with elevated cyfra21-1 than in those with normal cyfra21-1. Patients with high cyfra21-1 showed worse Disease free survival and Overall survival than those with low cyfra21-1 ( P = 0.001 and 0.007, respectively). In multivariate analysis, High cyfra21-1, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion and papillary were independent predictors of worse Disease free survival ( P = 0.036, <0.001, 0.002, 0.014 respectively). High cyfra21-1, lymph node involvement and lymphovascular invasion were also confirmed as independent predictors of worse Overall survival ( P = 0.038, 0.010, 0.005, respectively.)Conclusions: Elevated cyfra21-1 was associated with greater biological aggressiveness and worse prognosis than normal cyfra21-1.

Vitamin D status and survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18210-e18210
Author(s):  
John Khoury ◽  
Sruthi Jinna ◽  
Ali Sahlieh ◽  
Rebecca Chacko ◽  
David Macari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

e18210 Background: Although many studies have investigated the association of blood 25OH-vitamin D (vit-D) levels with breast cancer prognosis, the results have been mixed. It has been suggested that low vit-D concentrations were associated with advanced tumor stage and triple-negative (TNBC) subtype. We retrospectively investigated associations of serum vit-D levels with triple negative breast cancer outcome. Methods: Out of 797 cases of TNBC diagnosed at William Beaumont Hospital between 2006-2017, 163 patients had vit-D level available within 1 year prior to diagnosis. Analyses of vit-D levels was classified by 3 cut points (deficient, < 20.0 ng/mL; insufficient, 20.0-29.9 ng/mL; sufficient, ≥30.0 ng/mL). Primary outcomes are disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). SPSS statistics 25 software was used to analyze the data. Results: Median age of diagnosis of TNBC was 60. Of these patients 43.6% were diagnosed with stage I, 37.4% at stage II, 4.9% at stage III and 4.9% at stage IV. 47.2% of the patients had sufficient vit-D level prior to diagnosis, 28.2% with insufficient vit-D level and 24.5% with deficient vit-D. Vit-D deficiency was more prevalent in premenopausal than in postmenopausal women (33.3%, 41% and 25.6% in premenopausal women for deficient, insufficient and sufficient levels respectively vs 21.8%, 24.2% and 54% in postmenopausal women). Rates of Vit-D deficiency were not different between early disease and advanced disease (24.3% of patient with stage I-II vs 25% in patients with stage III-IV). Median OS and disease-free survival were not statistically different among the 3 different categories. 5-year OS was 91%, 91% and 85% for deficient, insufficient and sufficient levels respectively. 5-year DFS was 93%, 95% and 95% for deficient, insufficient and sufficient levels respectively. Multivariate COX regression analysis demonstrated that age and stage were associated with mortality, whereas vit-D level was not. Conclusions: The results from this study show that adequate vit-D level do not have an impact on OS and DFS in patients with triple negative breast cancer. Premenopausal women are more likely to have inadequate vit-D level. Identification and treatment of vitamin D deficiency is still important for musculoskeletal health and possibly extraskeletal health in general population and breast cancer survivors specifically.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document