scholarly journals Abolishing Youth Justice Systems: Children First, Offenders Nowhere

Youth Justice ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 147322541989875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Case ◽  
Kevin Haines
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Youth Justice ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
First Offenders ◽  
Children First

The 1980s decade of diversion in UK youth justice consolidated critiques of iatrogenic systemic contact and generated an abolitionist momentum that was significantly reversed by the 1990s punitive turn and ‘new youth justice’ strategies of modernisation, expansionism, interventionism and risk management. However, the tentative rejection of risk management and the rebirth of diversion in contemporary youth justice offer new hope for abolitionist arguments. This article critically evaluates contemporary abolitionist arguments, asserting that Children First definitions and diversionary, Bureau model responses could coalesce to form an innovative paradigm to replace traditional, formal conceptions of youth justice ‘systems’.

Youth Work and Social Pedagogy

2020 ◽  
pp. 149-167
Author(s):  
Howard Williamson ◽  
Mick Conroy
Keyword(s):  
Work Practice ◽  
Youth Work ◽  
Young Offenders ◽  
Political Climate ◽  
Youth Justice ◽  
Social Pedagogy ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Justice Model ◽  
First Offenders ◽  
Children First

The most visible differentiation between models of youth justice across Europe exists in tensions between welfare-based and justice-based approaches. Proponents of welfare-based interventions often find themselves conflicted by the current growth of a right-wing, nationalistic, and perhaps at times xenophobic political climate throughout Europe, calling for tougher sanctions and sentences for young offenders. As a consequence, the promotion of any primarily welfare-based approaches within youth justice settings throughout Europe has been slow to emerge within key strategies to develop effective interventions with young offenders. This chapter explores the merits of a youth justice model that embraces the “children first—offenders second” approach, and it examines the potential role that a hybrid model of youth work practice and social pedagogy theory might play in achieving one of the key principles of the Council of Europe: integrating young offenders back into society, and not their marginalization and social exclusion.

Youth justice in Australia: Themes from recent inquiries

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garner Clancey ◽  
Sindy Wang
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Young People ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Youth Justice ◽  
Amnesty International ◽  
Abuse And Neglect ◽  
International Attention ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
Reducing Recidivism ◽  
Almost All

The administration of youth justice systems in Australia is a state and territory responsibility. Almost all states and territories have in recent years undertaken extensive reviews of their youth justice systems. In addition, various oversight bodies (such as ombudsmen, inspectors of custodial services, children’s guardians and advocates), Commonwealth agencies (such as the Australian Law Reform Commission), and non-government organisations (such as Amnesty International) have also completed reviews and published reports in this area. The catalysts for some of these reviews were incidents in youth justice detention centres which captured national (and international) attention. A key theme arising from many of these reviews is the need for youth justice detention to be a measure of last resort. Detention, especially for young people who have been victims of abuse and neglect or who have mental illness and intellectual disabilities, is often detrimental and has little benefit in reducing recidivism. This paper explores this and other key themes arising from the recent reviews into Australian youth justice systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document