An Evaluation of the Quality of Integrated Care Pathway Development in the UK National Health Service

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Croucher

An integrated care pathway (ICP) is an outline of planned care for a specific patient group. It highlights usual practice that is evidence-based, from which variations occur as health-care professionals use their professional judgement. The objectives of the study were to identify the key elements within an ICP, to formulate a checklist utilizing the ICP key elements, and to evaluate ICPs available from the UK National electronic Library for Health (NeLH) against the checklist. An ICP key elements checklist was produced from a review of ICP literature. In all, 90% of the ICPs evaluated contained a plan of anticipated care along some form of timeline, including processes and outcomes. Also, 70% of the ICPs evaluated did not contain a variance-recording framework. In addition, 70% of the ICPs evaluated did not contain any evidence of evidence-based best practice. This study shows that there is wide variability in the quality of the ICPs being developed in the UK National Health Service (NHS), and that the development of ICPs in many health-care organizations is inadequate. Variability of the ICPs being developed will have a direct impact on the quality of patient care, and improvements in care and service delivery may not be identified, implemented or reviewed. It is recommended that a tool be produced, which would provide a standard framework for NHS staff to follow when developing ICPs.

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E de Luc ◽  
Claire Whittle

Integrated care pathways (ICPs) are being introduced as a tool to improve the quality of health care. Their local development usually involves some consensus-based approach which engages clinical staff in discussions about how to improve services. Whilst this has definite advantages, it also means that ICPs which are developed for ostensibly the same group of patients with a specific disease or condition will vary in content and quality. Many articles have been written expounding the benefits of using ICPs, but recently there have been a number of evaluations of ICPs which report little or no significant improvement in the quality of health care as a result of their introduction. Why is there this divergence of views about the value of ICPs? Could it be connected with the variability in quality of the ICPs being introduced? What is missing from many of the evaluations of ICPs undertaken so far is a consideration of how good those ICPs really are. This article describes an appraisal instrument for ICPs — the integrated care pathway appraisal tool (ICPAT) — which has been developed within the West Midlands region of the UK and which can provide a framework for assessing the quality of ICPs.


2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 471-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Timmons

Summary Objective: This study investigated whether computerized systems, designed to produce detailed plans for the nursing care of inpatients, were resisted by the nurses who were expected to use them. Methods: Qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews with nurses working in the UK National Health Service. Results and Conclusions: Resistance took the form of ‘resistive compliance,’ and this resistance is analyzed and explained. Resistance can best be understood in terms of the culture of nursing. This implies that the design and implementation of computerized systems in health care should take these factors into account.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  

This paper addresses the lack of knowledge and lack of standardization for treating individuals who engage in selfinjurious behavior (SIB) to the head. An evidence-based integrated care pathway is described that was created for health care professionals treating individuals with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) who engage in frequent and/or significant SIB. It is anticipated that this pathway will increase treatment team knowledge of best practices, decrease clinical variation, standardize care, and improve clinical outcomes with this vulnerable population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document