The Italian Trial of Endovascular AAA Exclusion Using the Parodi Endograft

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gioacchino Coppi ◽  
Roberto Moratto ◽  
Roberto Silingardi ◽  
Nicola Tusini ◽  
Roberto Vecchioni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Covered Stents ◽  
The Third ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Distal Fixation

Purpose: To report the outcome of the prospective 11-center Italian Parodi Trial using straight and tapered endografts for the endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Methods: From April 1994 to July 1995, 27 patients were evaluated and selected for endovascular AAA exclusion. The Parodi devices were delivered through femoral arteriotomies using 18 to 22F introducers and deployed by balloon expansion of the terminal stents. Results: Of 27 cases attempted, 24 endografts (15 tube, 9 aortomonoiliac) were implanted (1 deployment and 2 access failures [11.1%] were converted). Three endoleaks (12.5%) were treated intraoperatively with covered stents, two successfully, and the third sealed within 30 days. Three (12.5%) of the 24 treated patients died in-hospital of device- (n = 2) and procedure-related (n = 1) causes; the remaining 21 patients were discharged within 8 days. Of the 8 aortomonoiliac grafts in follow-up, only 1 (12.5%) failed in the mean 23-month (range 18 to 30) follow-up; however, 4 (31%) of 13 tube graft patients were converted to surgery within 18 months. Of the 16 (66.7%) surviving endografts at 2 years, 6 (38%) showed no change in the AAA diameter, while 10 (62%) had shrunk. Conclusions: The tube graft was applicable in only about 5% of cases, and accurate endograft sizing and distal fixation were problematic. The aortomonoiliac design was not appealing to surgeons but fared better in the long term. Given the advent of newer endograft models, the Italian Parodi Trial has been terminated.

scholarly journals Endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms by fenestrated and branched endografts†

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 993-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Gallitto ◽  
Gianluca Faggioli ◽  
Rodolfo Pini ◽  
Chiara Mascoli ◽  
Stefano Ancetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our objective was to report the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with endografts. METHODS Between January 2010 and April 2018, patients with TAAAs, considered at high surgical risk for open surgery and treated by Cook-Zenith fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair, were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively analysed. The early end points were 30-day/hospital mortality rate, spinal cord ischaemia and 30-day cardiopulmonary and nephrological morbidity. Follow-up end points were survival, patency of target visceral vessels and freedom from reinterventions. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients (male: 77%; mean age: 73 ± 7 years; American Society of Anesthesiologists 3/4: 58/42%) were enrolled. Using Crawford’s classification, 43 (49%) were types I–III and 45 (51%) were type IV TAAAs. The mean aneurysm diameter was 65 ± 15 mm. Custom-made and off-the-shelf endografts were used in 60 (68%) and 28 (32%) cases, respectively. Five (6%) patients had a contained ruptured TAAA. The procedure was performed in multiple steps in 42 (48%) cases. There was 1 (1%) intraoperative death. Five (6%) patients suffered spinal cord ischaemia with permanent paraplegia in 3 (3%) cases. Postoperative cardiac and pulmonary complications occurred in 7 (8%) and 12 (14%) patients, respectively. Worsening of renal function (≥30% of baseline level) was detected in 11 (13%) cases, and 2 (2%) patients required haemodialysis. The 30-day and hospital mortality rates were 5% and 8%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 36 ± 22 months. Survival at 12, 24 and 36 months was 89%, 75% and 70%, respectively. The patency of target visceral vessels at 12, 24 and 36 months was 92%, 92% and 92%, respectively. Freedom from reinterventions at 12, 24 and 36 months was 85%, 85% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The endovascular repair of TAAAs with fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair is feasible and effective with acceptable technical/clinical outcomes at early/midterm follow-up.

Long-term computed tomography follow-up after open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 549-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mantoni ◽  
K. Neergaard ◽  
J. K. Christoffersen ◽  
T. L. Lambine ◽  
N. BÆkgaard
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Open Surgical Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

Endovascular treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms by combining different types of endoprostheses

Vascular ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Menno T de Bruijn ◽  
Erik Tournoij ◽  
Daniel AF van den Heuvel ◽  
Debbie de Vries-Werson ◽  
Jan Wille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Diameter ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Aortic Neck ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Different Types

Purpose To describe an off-the-shelf method for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile (large, >30 mm) neck and/or small (<20 mm) aortic bifurcation. Case report We describe five patients with large aortic necks and/or small aortic bifurcations, which were treated by combining an AFX endoprosthesis with a Valiant Captiva endograft, and additional proximal endoanchors when deemed necessary. Initial technical success was 100%. Follow-up ranged from 228 to 875 days. One patient suffered a type 1A and 1B endoleak at 446 days follow-up, which were successfully treated by endovascular means. Conclusion Combining the AFX and Valiant Captiva endografts is an off-the-shelf solution for treatment of large diameter aortic necks and small aortic bifurcations in patients deemed unfit for open repair or declined for fenestrated endografts. Longer follow-up is required to assess the long-term safety with special focus on aortic neck dilation.

Stents for the Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (S 01) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ebert ◽  
M. Langer ◽  
P. Uhrmeister
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Imaging Modalities ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
First Results

SummaryThe endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms has generated a great deal of interest since the early 1990s, and many different devices are currently available. The procedure of endovascular repair has been evaluated in many institutions and the different devices are compared. The first results were encouraging, but complications like endoleak, dislocation or thrombosis of the graft occurred. By the available devices the stent application is only promising, if the known exclusion criteria are strictly respected. Therefore a careful preinterventional assessment of the patient by different imaging modalities is necessary. As the available results up to now are preliminary and the durability of the devices has to be controlled, multicenter studies are required to improve the devices and observe their long- term success in the exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document