scholarly journals Knowledge-Based Statistical Inference Method for Plan Quality Quantification

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381985775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang Zhang ◽  
Q. Jackie Wu ◽  
Yaorong Ge ◽  
Chunhao Wang ◽  
Yang Sheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Quality Analysis ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Inference Method ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Plan Selection ◽  
Parotid Sparing ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Over Time

Aim: The aim of the study is to develop a geometrically adaptive and statistically robust plan quality inference method. Methods and Materials: We propose a knowledge-based plan quality inference method that references to similar plans in the historical database for patient-specific plan quality evaluation. First, a novel plan similarity metric with high-dimension geometrical difference quantification is utilized to retrieve similar plans. Subsequently, dosimetric statistical inferences are obtained from the selected similar plans. Two plan quality metrics—dosimetric result probability and dose deviation index—are proposed to quantify plan quality among prior similar plans. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we exported 927 clinically approved head and neck treatment plans. Eight organs at risk, including brain stem, cord, larynx, mandible, pharynx, oral cavity, left parotid and right parotid, were analyzed. Twelve suboptimal plans identified by dosimetric result probability were replanned to validate the capability of the proposed methods in identifying inferior plans. Results: After replanning, left and right parotid median doses are reduced by 31.7% and 18.2%, respectively; 83% of these cases would not be identified as suboptimal without the proposed similarity plan selection. Analysis of population plan quality reveals that average parotid sparing has been improving significantly over time (21.7% dosimetric result probability reduction from year 2006-2007 to year 2016-2017). Notably, the increasing dose sparing over time in retrospective plan quality analysis is strongly correlated with the increasing dose prescription ratios to the 2 planning targets, revealing the collective trend in planning conventions. Conclusions: The proposed similar plan retrieval and analysis methodology has been proven to be predictive of the current plan quality. Therefore, the proposed workflow can potentially be applied in the clinics as a real-time plan quality assurance tool. The proposed metrics can also serve the purpose of plan quality analytics in finding connections and historical trends in the clinical treatment planning workflow.

Knowledge-based radiotherapy treatment planning

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Lindsey Appenzoller Olsen
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Radiotherapy Planning ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Radiotherapy Treatment Planning ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Knowledge Based Planning ◽  
Radiotherapy Treatment

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] Knowledge-based planning (KBP) has become a prominent area of research in radiation oncology in the last five years. The development of KBP aims to address the lack of systematic quality control and plan quality variability in radiotherapy treatment planning by providing achievable, patient-specific optimization objectives derived from a model trained with a cohort of previously treated, site-specific plans. This dissertation intended to develop, evaluate, and implement a knowledge-based planning system to reduce variability and improve radiotherapy treatment plan quality. The project aimed to 1) develop and validate an algorithm to train mathematical models that predict dose-volume histograms for organs at risk in radiotherapy planning, 2) implement the algorithm into a software application in order to transfer the technology into clinical practice, and 3) evaluate the impact of the software system (algorithm + application) on reducing variability and improving radiotherapy treatment plan quality through knowledge transfer. The presented work demonstrates that a KBP model is beneficial to radiotherapy planning. The developed models adequately describe what is dosimetrically achievable for patient specific anatomy and have proven useful in outlier detection for quality control of radiotherapy planning. The KBP paradigm has also demonstrated ability to improve treatment plan quality through benchmarking and transfer of knowledge between institutions.

scholarly journals Automatic Radiotherapy Planning for Glioblastoma Radiotherapy With Sparing of the Hippocampus and nTMS-Defined Motor Cortex

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Schuermann ◽  
Yvonne Dzierma ◽  
Frank Nuesken ◽  
Joachim Oertel ◽  
Christian Rübe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Maximum Dose ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Radiotherapy Planning ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Planning Algorithm ◽  
Treatment Plans

BackgroundNavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) of the motor cortex has been successfully implemented into radiotherapy planning by a number of studies. Furthermore, the hippocampus has been identified as a radiation-sensitive structure meriting particular sparing in radiotherapy. This study assesses the joint protection of these two eloquent brain regions for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), with particular emphasis on the use of automatic planning.Patients and MethodsPatients with motor-eloquent brain glioblastoma who underwent surgical resection after nTMS mapping of the motor cortex and adjuvant radiotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. The radiotherapy treatment plans were retrieved, and the nTMS-defined motor cortex and hippocampus contours were added. Four additional treatment plans were created for each patient: two manual plans aimed to reduce the dose to the motor cortex and hippocampus by manual inverse planning. The second pair of re-optimized plans was created by the Auto-Planning algorithm. The optimized plans were compared with the “Original” plan regarding plan quality, planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and sparing of organs at risk (OAR).ResultsA total of 50 plans were analyzed. All plans were clinically acceptable with no differences in the PTV coverage and plan quality metrics. The OARs were preserved in all plans; however, overall the sparing was significantly improved by Auto-Planning. Motor cortex protection was feasible and significant, amounting to a reduction in the mean dose by >6 Gy. The dose to the motor cortex outside the PTV was reduced by >12 Gy (mean dose) and >5 Gy (maximum dose). The hippocampi were significantly improved (reduction in mean dose: ipsilateral >6 Gy, contralateral >4.6 Gy; reduction in maximum dose: ipsilateral >5 Gy, contralateral >5 Gy). While the dose reduction using Auto-Planning was generally better than by manual optimization, the radiated total monitor units were significantly increased.ConclusionConsiderable dose sparing of the nTMS-motor cortex and hippocampus could be achieved with no disadvantages in plan quality. Auto-Planning could further contribute to better protection of OAR. Whether the improved dosimetric protection of functional areas can translate into improved quality of life and motor or cognitive performance of the patients can only be decided by future studies.

scholarly journals Personalising treatment plan quality review with knowledge-based planning in the TROG 15.03 trial for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in primary kidney cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Hardcastle ◽  
Olivia Cook ◽  
Xenia Ray ◽  
Alisha Moore ◽  
Kevin L. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Kidney Cancer ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Knowledge Based Planning ◽  
Treatment Plans

Abstract Introduction Quality assurance (QA) of treatment plans in clinical trials improves protocol compliance and patient outcomes. Retrospective use of knowledge-based-planning (KBP) in clinical trials has demonstrated improved treatment plan quality and consistency. We report the results of prospective use of KBP for real-time QA of treatment plan quality in the TROG 15.03 FASTRACK II trial, which evaluates efficacy of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for kidney cancer. Methods A KBP model was generated based on single institution data. For each patient in the KBP phase (open to the last 31 patients in the trial), the treating centre submitted treatment plans 7 days prior to treatment. A treatment plan was created by using the KBP model, which was compared with the submitted plan for each organ-at-risk (OAR) dose constraint. A report comparing each plan for each OAR constraint was provided to the submitting centre within 24 h of receiving the plan. The centre could then modify the plan based on the KBP report, or continue with the existing plan. Results Real-time feedback using KBP was provided in 24/31 cases. Consistent plan quality was in general achieved between KBP and the submitted plan. KBP review resulted in replan and improvement of OAR dosimetry in two patients. All centres indicated that the feedback was a useful QA check of their treatment plan. Conclusion KBP for real-time treatment plan review was feasible for 24/31 cases, and demonstrated ability to improve treatment plan quality in two cases. Challenges include integration of KBP feedback into clinical timelines, interpretation of KBP results with respect to clinical trade-offs, and determination of appropriate plan quality improvement criteria.

Dosimetric comparison of RapidPlan and manually optimised volumetric modulated arc therapy plans in prostate cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Loyce M. H. Chua ◽  
Eric P. P. Pang ◽  
Zubin Master ◽  
Rehena Sultana ◽  
Jeffrey K. L. Tuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Planning Time ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Time Required

Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether RapidPlan (RP) could generate clinically acceptable prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Methods: The in-house RP model was used to generate VMAT plans for 50 previously treated prostate cancer patients, with no additional optimisation being performed. The VMAT plans that were generated using the RP model were compared with the patients’ previous, manually optimised clinical plans (MP), none of which had been used for the development of the in-house RP prostate model. Differences between RP and MP in planning target volume (PTV) doses, organs at risk (OAR) sparing, monitor units (MU) and planning time required to produce treatment plans were analysed. Assessment of PTV doses was based on the conformation number (CN), homogeneity index (HI), D2%, D99% and the mean dose of the PTV. The OAR doses evaluated were the rectal V50 Gy, V65 Gy, V70 Gy and the mean dose, the bladder V65 Gy, V70 Gy and the mean dose, and the mean dose to both femurs. Results: D99% and mean dose of the PTV were lower for RP than for MP (p = 0·006 and p = 0·040, respectively).V50 Gy, V65 Gy and the mean dose to rectum were lower in RP than in MP (p < 0·001). V65 Gy, V70 Gy and the mean dose to bladder were lower in RP than in MP (p < 0·001). RP had enhanced the sparing of both femurs (p < 0·001) and significantly reduced the planning time to less than 5% of the time taken with MP. MU in RP was significantly higher than MP by an average of 52·5 MU (p < 0·001) and 46 out of the 50 RP plans were approved by the radiation oncologist. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that VMAT plans generated using an in-house RP prostate model in a single optimisation for prostate patients were clinically acceptable with comparable or better plan quality compared to MP. RP can add value and improve treatment planning efficiency in a high-throughput radiotherapy department through reduced plan optimisation time while maintaining consistency in the plan quality.

SU-E-T-572: A Plan Quality Metric for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Treatment Plans

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6Part19) ◽  
pp. 3837-3837
Author(s):  
V Chanyavanich ◽  
J Lo ◽  
S Das
Keyword(s):  
Plan Quality ◽  
Quality Metric ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Treatment Plans

Knowledge-Based Decision Support for Diagnosis and Therapy: On the Multiple Usability of Patient Data

1989 ◽  
Vol 28 (02) ◽  
pp. 69-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Haux
Keyword(s):  
Expert Systems ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Attribute Selection ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Statistical Data Analysis ◽  
Inference Mechanism ◽  
Diagnosis And Therapy ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Clinical Registries

Abstract:Expert systems in medicine are frequently restricted to assisting the physician to derive a patient-specific diagnosis and therapy proposal. In many cases, however, there is a clinical need to use these patient data for other purposes as well. The intention of this paper is to show how and to what extent patient data in expert systems can additionally be used to create clinical registries and for statistical data analysis. At first, the pitfalls of goal-oriented mechanisms for the multiple usability of data are shown by means of an example. Then a data acquisition and inference mechanism is proposed, which includes a procedure for controlling selection bias, the so-called knowledge-based attribute selection. The functional view and the architectural view of expert systems suitable for the multiple usability of patient data is outlined in general and then by means of an application example. Finally, the ideas presented are discussed and compared with related approaches.

scholarly journals What is plan quality in radiotherapy? The importance of evaluating dose metrics, complexity, and robustness of treatment plans

2020 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Hernandez ◽  
Christian Rønn Hansen ◽  
Lamberto Widesott ◽  
Anna Bäck ◽  
Richard Canters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plan Quality ◽  
Dose Metrics ◽  
Treatment Plans

scholarly journals Multicriterial CNN based beam generation for robotic radiosurgery of the prostate

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gerlach ◽  
Christoph Fürweger ◽  
Theresa Hofmann ◽  
Alexander Schlaefer
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Beam Generation ◽  
Radiological Features ◽  
Improve Treatment ◽  
Robotic Radiosurgery ◽  
Treatment Plans

AbstractAlthough robotic radiosurgery offers a flexible arrangement of treatment beams, generating treatment plans is computationally challenging and a time consuming process for the planner. Furthermore, different clinical goals have to be considered during planning and generally different sets of beams correspond to different clinical goals. Typically, candidate beams sampled from a randomized heuristic form the basis for treatment planning. We propose a new approach to generate candidate beams based on deep learning using radiological features as well as the desired constraints. We demonstrate that candidate beams generated for specific clinical goals can improve treatment plan quality. Furthermore, we compare two approaches to include information about constraints in the prediction. Our results show that CNN generated beams can improve treatment plan quality for different clinical goals, increasing coverage from 91.2 to 96.8% for 3,000 candidate beams on average. When including the clinical goal in the training, coverage is improved by 1.1% points.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document