scholarly journals A Human Factors Evaluation of the American Kitchen

1975 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-124
Author(s):  
LaVerne L. Hoag ◽  
Robert H. Van Dyke

Kitchen design is evaluated using counter space, counter location and counter height as the criteria. A survey of apartment kitchens showed that designers generally follow the guidelines for total counter space, but the allocation of counter space to the different work centers makes the designs inadequate. An experimental study shows that the standard 36 high counter surface is not at the correct height for many kitchen tasks and a simple, economical design for adjustable cabinets is presented.

Author(s):  
Merissa Walkenstein ◽  
Ronda Eisenberg

This paper describes an experimental study that compares a graphical user interface for a computer-telephony product designed without the involvement of a human factors engineer to a redesign of that interface designed with a human factors engineer late in the development cycle. Both interfaces were usability tested with target customers. Results from a number of measures, both subjective and objective, indicate that the interface designed with the human factors engineer was easier to use than the interface designed without the human factors engineer. The results of this study show the benefits of involving human factors engineers in the design of graphical user interfaces even towards the end of a development cycle. However, this involvement is most effective when human factors engineers are included as an integral part of the design and development process even at this late stage in the process.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohisa Hashimoto ◽  
Kohji Tomita ◽  
Ali Boyali ◽  
Yusuke Takinami ◽  
Osamu Matsumoto

Author(s):  
Roger C. Jensen

An experimental study sought to extend understanding of the nosing-to-nosing method for measuring dimensions of steps in a stairway. A human factors expert retained to assist an attorney in a case of injury or death from a stairway fall needs to decide the lateral location for taking the measurements. This experiment was undertaken to provide experts with a justifiable basis for choosing the location. Using a campus stairway and 16 student subjects, a randomized complete block experiment compared their lateral location while performing four tasks—ascending with or without the handrail, and descending with or without the handrail. Results showed task significantly affected lateral distance. Based on findings from this experiment, and some professional judgment, the authors provide recommended ranges for the lateral locations for measuring step dimensions—30 to 38.5 cm for ascending, and 19 to 28 cm for descending.


2021 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 103389
Author(s):  
Andrew Hill ◽  
Sophie J. Francis ◽  
Mark S. Horswill ◽  
Melany J. Christofidis ◽  
Marcus O. Watson

BMC Nursing ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Randi Ballangrud ◽  
Sissel Eikeland Husebø ◽  
Karina Aase ◽  
Oddveig Reiersdal Aaberg ◽  
Anne Vifladt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document