Symposium the Work of the NAS/NRC Committee on Human Factors

1989 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 567-567
Author(s):  
Douglas H. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Federal Government ◽  
Research Council ◽  
National Research Council ◽  
Research Needs ◽  
Methodological Issues ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Standing Committee ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Human Factors Research

Since 1980, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has had a standing committee on human factors as part of its operating agency, the National Research Council (NRC). The Committee on Human Factors, like other NRC committees, serves as an independent advisor to the federal government–identifying critical theoretical and methodological issues, defining the state of knowledge with regard to these issues, and determining research needs and their priorities. In this capacity, the Committee has the opportunity to provide new perspectives on human factors and to guide the direction and support of future human factors research and development. The purpose of this symposium is to provide an overview of the origins and purposes of the Committee on Human Factors, and to present examples of some of its recent work.

The National Research Council Committee on Human Factors

1989 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 568-570
Author(s):  
Harold P. Van Cott
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Research Council ◽  
National Research Council ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Standing Committee ◽  
Technical Systems ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
National Research Council Committee

The Committee on Human Factors, a standing committee of the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (NAS/NRC), advises its sustaining sponsors and other requesting organizations on issues involved in the design of socio-technical systems and on the research and methods needed to help enhance their operability and safety. This paper describes the origins, purposes, operations and program of the committee and emphasizes the special attributes of this and other NAS/NRC commtittees.

Panel Discussion on Activities of NAS/NRC Committee on Human Factors: Solicitation of HFS Member Suggestions and Priorities for Research

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (14) ◽  
pp. 1412-1414
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Sheridan ◽  
Stanley Deutsch
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
National Research Council ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

This report briefly describes the origins, purposes, and membership of the Committee on Human Factors (COHF) of the National Academy of Sciences/ National Research Council (NAS/NRC). Completed studies and studies in progress are described. The objective of the panel is to elicit comments and suggestions regarding current COHF activities and to discover what are HFS members' priorties for research.

Monitoring of Coastal Ocean Waters Receiving Wastewaters in the USA: Review of Two 1990 Publications of the USA National Research Council – National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engineering

1992 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 49-57
Author(s):  
W. F. Garber
Keyword(s):  
Coastal Waters ◽  
Research Council ◽  
National Research Council ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Water Contact ◽  
National Monitoring ◽  
Usable Information ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Monitoring Effort ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

Required monitoring of the physical, biological and chemical condition of the nearshore waters of the ocean receiving treated wastewaters has been underway in the U.S.A. since 1955 or about 35 years. When established the stated intent had been to utilize the information obtained to evaluate the effects of the diffusion of wastewaters upon the beneficial values of these receiving waters. That is upon the food web including game and food fish; upon water contact sports uses; upon aesthetics; and upon the local, regional, and worldwide ecology. To this end original requirements had included a provision that the regulatory agency reduce the data obtained from the monitoring effort to information useful to themselves as well as to facility design and operational authorities. Inasmuch as the monitoring effort in 1989 was using funds in excess of 130 million dollars per year and had a 35 year data base, the Marine Board of the National Research Council - National Academy of Sciences: National Academy of Engineering established committees of scientists to evaluate the progress of the national monitoring effort and of the longest and most complete program of the Southern California Bight. It was found that the essential portion of the program, that of reducing the data obtained to usable information, had not been carried on so that approximately 35 years of data existed with little to zero information. In addition the data existed in pools of intensive samplings around discharge points with very little overall study of the coastal waters. Whether the discharge points were significantly different from the “normal” coastal waters was not really known because “normal” was not known. The Committees recommended procedures to follow to rectify these basic problems including reallocation of current funding to cover the research, control, design and operational needs. Their findings are summarized in the paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document