Evoked Potentials Investigations of Deficit Versus Nondeficit Schizophrenia: EEG-MEG Preliminary Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nash N. Boutros ◽  
Klevest Gjini ◽  
Frank Wang ◽  
Susan M. Bowyer

Heterogeneity of schizophrenia is a major obstacle toward understanding the disorder. One likely subtype is the deficit syndrome (DS) where patients suffer from predominantly negative symptoms. This study investigated the evoked responses and the evoked magnetic fields to identify the neurophysiological deviations associated with the DS. Ten subjects were recruited for each group (Control, DS, and Nondeficit schizophrenia [NDS]). Subjects underwent magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) testing while listening to an oddball paradigm to generate the P300 as well as a paired click paradigm to generate the mid-latency auditory-evoked responses (MLAER) in a sensory gating paradigm. MEG–coherence source imaging (CSI) during P300 task revealed a significantly higher average coherence value in DS than NDS subjects in the gamma band (30-80 Hz), when listening to standard stimuli but only NDS subjects had a higher average coherence level in the gamma band than controls when listening to the novel sounds. P50, N100, and P3a ERP amplitudes (EEG analysis) were significantly decreased in NDS compared with DS subjects. The data suggest that the deviations in the 2 patient groups are qualitatively different. Deviances in NDS patients suggest difficulty in both early (as in the gating paradigm), as well as later top-down processes (P300 paradigm). The main deviation in the DS group was an exaggerated responsiveness to ongoing irrelevant stimuli detected by EEG whereas NDS subjects had an exaggerated response to novelty.

2001 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 1219-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.G Gurtubay ◽  
M Alegre ◽  
A Labarga ◽  
A Malanda ◽  
J Iriarte ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Khalil Kayed ◽  
Reidar Kloster

1984 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Sersen ◽  
J. Majkowski ◽  
J. Clausen ◽  
G. M. Heaney

BAERs from 16 subjects during 3 sessions varied in the latency or amplitude of some components depending upon level of arousal as indicated by EEG patterns. There was a general tendency for activation to produce the fastest responses with the largest amplitudes and for drowsiness to produce the slowest responses with the smallest amplitudes. The latency of P2 was significantly prolonged during drowsiness, relative to those during relaxation or activation. For right-ear stimulation, P5 latency was longest during drowsiness, and shortest during activation while for left-ear stimulation the shortest latency occurred during relaxation. The amplitudes of Wave II and Wave VII were significantly smaller during drowsiness than during activation. Although the differences were below the level of clinical significance, the data indicate a modification in the characteristics of brainstem transmission as a function of concurrent activity in other brain areas.


1998 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Pasman ◽  
J. J. Rotteveel ◽  
B. Maassen ◽  
R. de Graaf ◽  
A. A. Kollée

1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Skinner ◽  
Frank Antinoro

Averaged evoked responses (AER) to auditory stimuli presented to young children and adults were compared between awake and induced sleep conditions. Eight adults and twenty preschool children with normal hearing were tested before and during sedation at two suprathreshold levels with tone pips centered at 510, 1020, and 2040 Hz. Responses obtained during sedation assumed a distinctly different wave complex than those obtained under the awake condition. The P2 peak that is most prominent in the AERs obtained from awake subjects was diminished considerably under sedation and P3 became the prominent peak. Moreover, the P3 peaks in the AERs obtained under sedation were of considerably greater amplitude than the P2 peaks obtained in the awake condition. In all cases where responses were obtained from awake subjects, greater amplitude responses were obtained during sedation. The use of sedation with the preschool children proved to be most important in obtaining more detectable responses and permitting evoked potential audiometry with otherwise unmanageable children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document