Daily Insulin Dose at One Year Predicts Weight Gain in People with Type 2 Diabetes Newly Treated with Insulin

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
M. Vinall ◽  
B. Beverley
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Ma ◽  
Huan Zhou ◽  
Hua Xu ◽  
Xie Chen ◽  
Xiangyu Teng ◽  
...  

Background. It has been well accepted that insulin therapy is the ideal treatment for newly diagnosed diabetic patients. However, there was no study about assessment of the initial insulin dosage in new onset Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes.Research Design and Methods. 65 newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes (39 males/26 females; HbA1c ≥ 11.80 ± 0.22%) were investigated. All patients had random hyperglycaemia (at 21.8 ± 3.9 mmol/L) on the first day of admission and received insulin infusion intravenously (5 U/per hour). When the blood glucose level dropped to around 10 mmol/L, patients were then transferred to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The reduction of blood glucose levels in response to per unit of insulin (RBG/RI) was recorded. The target glucose level was achieved in about 3 days. The total daily insulin dose (TDD) and basal insulin dose (TBD) were calculated.Results. TDD was 45.97 ± 1.28 units and TBD was 19.00 ± 0.54 units. TBD was about 40% of the total daily insulin requirement. There was a negative correlation between the ratio of RBG/RI and TDD.Conclusions. TDD was correlated with blood glucose reduction in response to intravenous insulin infusion in Chinese new onset patients with type 2 diabetes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1070-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Herrmann ◽  
Kevin Shan ◽  
Steven Brunell ◽  
Steve Chen

Author(s):  
Robert E J Ryder ◽  
Mahi Yadagiri ◽  
Wyn Burbridge ◽  
Susan P Irwin ◽  
Hardeep Gandhi ◽  
...  

Aims: EndoBarrier is a 60 cm duodenal–jejunal bypass liner endoscopically implanted for up to one year. It mimics the bypass part of Roux-en-Y bariatric surgery and reduces weight and HbA1c while it is in situ. We aimed to assess the extent to which these improvements are sustained in people with diabetes in the year following removal.Methods: Between October 2014 and November 2017 we implanted 62 EndoBarriers in an NHS service with all removed by November 2018. Outcomes were monitored in a registry.Results: By November 2019, 46/62 (72%) (mean±SD age 51.5±7.7 years, 52% male, 54.3% white ethnicity, median (IQR) diabetes duration 14.5 (8–20) years, 67.4% insulin-treated and mean±SD body mass index (BMI) 41.6±7.1 kg/m2) had attended and 16/62 (28%) did not attend their one-year post-EndoBarrier follow-up appointment. In those who attended, during EndoBarrier implantation mean±SD HbA1c fell by 21.1±19.6 mmol/mol from 77.1±20.0 to 56.0±11.2 mmol/mol (p<0.001) (by 1.9±1.8% from 9.2±1.8% to 7.3±1.0% (p<0.001)), weight fell by 17.2±8.8 kg from 121.9±29.4 kg to 104.7±30.1 kg (p<0.001), BMI fell from 41.6±7.5 to 35.5±7.5 kg/m2 (p<0.001), systolic blood pressure from 139.0±14.0 to 126.0±14.6 mmHg (p<0.001) and serum alanine aminotransferase from 30.0±16.9 to 18.8±11.0 U/L (p<0.001). Median (IQR) total daily insulin dose reduced from 104 (54–162) to 30 (0–62) units (n=31, p<0.001); 10/31 (32%) insulin-treated people with diabetes were able to discontinue insulin. One year post-EndoBarrier, 18/46 (39%) demonstrated fully sustained improvement, 18/46 (39%) partially sustained improvement and 10/46 (22%) reverted to baseline. Of those deteriorating, 9/10 (90%) had depression and/or bereavement; they also had less fall in weight and HbA1c during EndoBarrier treatment. In the 16/62 (28%) who did not attend follow-up, reasons for non-attendance were too far to travel (25%), need to take time off work (6.3%), severe depression (6.3%) and death (6.3%). In 56.3% of cases no reason was given.Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that EndoBarrier is highly effective in people with long-standing poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and obesity, with maintenance of significant improvement one year after removal in 78% of cases for whom data were available. As an endoscopic procedure it is relatively simple and non-invasive and it deserves further investigation.


2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1572-1576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary U Kabadi ◽  
Udaya M Kabadi

BACKGROUND: In subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, glycemic control deteroriates while patients use sulfonylurea drugs during the course of the disease. Adjunctive therapy with insulin at this stage requires a lesser daily insulin dose in comparison with insulin monotherapy while restoring desirable glycemic control. However, data regarding direct comparison between various sulfonylureas in this regard are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To examine comparative efficacies of adjunctive therapy with insulin in subjects with type 2 diabetes manifesting lapse of glycemic control while receiving various individual sulfonylurea drugs. METHODS: Four groups of 10 subjects, each presenting with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) >8.0% while using either tolazamide, glyburide, glipizide Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System (GITS), or glimepiride, were recruited. Two from each group were randomized to receive placebo; the others continued the same drug. Pre-supper subcutaneous 70 NPH/30 regular insulin was initiated at 10 units and gradually increased and adjusted as necessary to attain fasting blood glucose levels between 80 and 120 mg/dL and maintain the same range for 6 months. Fasting plasma glucose, plasma C-peptide, and HbA1C concentrations were determined prior to the addition of insulin and at the end of the study. Daily insulin dose and changes in body weight (BW) were noted at the end of the study, and the number of hypoglycemic events during the last 4 weeks of the study was determined. RESULTS: Daily insulin dose (units/kg BW), weight gain, and number of hypoglycemic events were significantly lower (p < 0.01) in subjects receiving sulfonylureas in comparison with placebo. However, the daily insulin dose alone was significantly lower (p < 0.05) with glimepiride (0.49 ± 0.10; mean ± SE) than with other sulfonylureas (tolazamide 0.58 ± 0.12, glyburide 0.59 ± 0.12, glipizide GITS 0.59 ± 0.14). Finally, a significant correlation (r = 0.68; p < 0.001) was noted between suppression of plasma C-peptide level and the daily insulin dose among all participants. CONCLUSIONS: By lowering the daily insulin dose, sulfonylurea drugs appear to improve the sensitivity of exogenous insulin in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus manifesting lapse of glycemic control. Moreover, glimepiride appears to possess a greater insulin-sparing property than other sulfonylureas.


2020 ◽  
pp. 193229682090688
Author(s):  
Liana K. Billings ◽  
Bue F. Ross Agner ◽  
Yuksel Altuntas ◽  
Randi Grøn ◽  
Natalie Halladin ◽  
...  

Background: Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) results in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels comparable with basal-bolus (BB) therapy. Here, we assessed the effect of once-daily IDegLira compared with BB (once-daily insulin glargine 100 U/mL and insulin aspart ≤4 times/day) across subgroups with varying characteristics. Materials and Methods: DUAL VII trial participants (type 2 diabetes [T2D], HbA1c 53-86 mmol/mol [7.0%-10.0%]) were subgrouped post hoc based on the following baseline characteristics: HbA1c (≤58.5, >58.5 to ≤69.4, and >69.4 mmol/mol; ≤7.5%, >7.5 to ≤8.5%, and >8.5%), body mass index (<30, ≥30 to <35, and ≥35 kg/m2), age (18 to <65 and ≥65 years), duration of diabetes (≥0 to 10 and ≥10 years), total pretrial daily basal insulin dose (20 to <30, ≥30 to <40, and ≥40 to ≤50 U), and fasting plasma glucose (<7.2 mmol/L/<130 mg/dL and ≥7.2 mmol/L/≥130 mg/dL). Results: Compared with BB, and in all subgroups, IDegLira treatment consistently gave similar HbA1c reductions, less severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycemia, lower end-of-trial (EOT) total daily insulin dose, and weight loss. In all subgroups, mean EOT HbA1c was ≤53 mmol/mol (≤7.0%). The greatest HbA1c reduction occurred in the highest baseline HbA1c subgroup. Overall, mean EOT daily insulin dose was 0.43 to 0.52 U/kg with IDegLira and 0.74 to 1.07 U/kg with BB. More participants achieved the triple composite endpoint (HbA1c <53 mmol/mol [<7.0%] without weight gain or hypoglycemia) with IDegLira vs BB across the baseline HbA1c subgroups (≤58.5 mmol/mol [44.6% vs 7.0%], >58.5 to ≤69.4 mmol/mol [41.1% vs 8.3%], and >69.4 mmol/mol [23.8% vs 3.4%]). Conclusion: These results support initiating IDegLira in patients with varying baseline characteristics and uncontrolled T2D on basal insulin. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02420262


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Dahlqvist ◽  
Elsa Ahlén ◽  
Karin Filipsson ◽  
Thomas Gustafsson ◽  
Irl B Hirsch ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate variables associated with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight reduction when adding liraglutide to persons with type 2 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI).Research design and methodsThis was a reanalysis of a previous trial where 124 patients were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter randomized trial carried out over 24 weeks. Predictors for effect on change in HbA1c and weight were analyzed within the treatment group and with concurrent interaction analyses. Correlation analyses for change in HbA1c and weight from baseline to week 24 were made.ResultsThe mean age at baseline was 63.7 years, 64.8% were men, the mean number of insulin injections was 4.4 per day, the mean daily insulin dose was 105 units and the mean HbA1c was 74.5 mmol/mol (9.0%). The mean HbA1c and weight reductions were 12.3 mmol/mol (1.13%; P<0.001) and 3.8 kg (P<0.001) greater in liraglutide than placebo-treated persons. There was no significant predictor for greater effect on HbA1c that existed in all analyses (univariate, multivariate and interaction analyses against controls). For a greater weight reduction when adding liraglutide, a lower HbA1c level at baseline was a predictor (liraglutide group P=0.002, P=0.020 for liraglutide group vs placebo). During follow-up in the liraglutide group, no significant correlation was found between change in weight and change in HbA1c (r=0.09, P=0.46), whereas a correlation existed between weight and insulin dose reduction (r=0.44, P<0.001).ConclusionWeight reduction becomes greater when adding liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with MDI who had a lower HbA1c level compared with those with a higher HbA1c level. There was no correlation between reductions in HbA1c and weight when liraglutide was added, that is, different patient groups responded with HbA1c and weight reductions.Trial registration numberEudraCT nr: 2012-001941-42.


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie McAdam-Marx ◽  
Junhua Yu ◽  
Jonathan Bouchard ◽  
Mark Aagren ◽  
Diana I. Brixner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document