scholarly journals Impacts of mobile phone distractions on pedestrian crossing behavior at signalized intersections: An observational study in China

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 168781401984183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuping Zhou ◽  
Sixian Liu ◽  
Wenxin Xu ◽  
Ziyuan Pu ◽  
Shuichao Zhang ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Cook

Along urban and suburban arterials, closely-spaced signalized intersections are commonly used to provide access to adjacent commercial developments. Often, these signalized intersections are designed to provide full access to developments on both sides of the arterial and permit through, left-turn, and right-turn movements from every intersection approach. Traffic signal timing is optimized to reduce vehicle delay or provide progression to vehicles on the arterial, or both. However, meeting both of these criteria can be cumbersome, if not impossible, under high-demand situations. This research proposes a new design that consolidates common movements at three consecutive signalized intersections into strategic fixed locations along the arterial. The consolidation of common movements allows the intersections to cycle between only two critical phases, which, in turn, promotes shorter cycle lengths, lower delay, and better progression. This research tested the consolidated intersection concept by modeling a real-world site in microsimulation software and obtaining values for delay and travel time for multiple vehicle paths along the corridor and adjacent commercial developments in both existing and proposed conditions. With the exception of unsignalized right turns at the periphery of the study area, all non-displaced routes showed a reduction in travel time and delay. Additional research is needed to understand how additional travel through the commercial developments adjacent to the arterial may effect travel time and delay. Other expected benefits of the proposed design include a major reduction in conflict points, shorter pedestrian crossing and wait times, and the opportunity to provide pedestrian refuge areas in the median.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-388
Author(s):  
Hualong Zhang ◽  
Cunbao Zhang ◽  
Feng Chen ◽  
YuanYuan Wei

Using mobile phones can be a source of distraction for pedestrians when crossing streets, it is especially dangerous at unsignalized intersections. To investigate the effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behavior and safety at unsignalized intersections, we carried out a field survey at three selected locations in Wuhan, China. Then, the pedestrians’ crossing behavior characteristics were statistically analyzed, and a logistic regression model was established to quantitatively analyze pedestrian safety. The results showed that 15.6% of pedestrians used mobile phones when crossing unsignalized intersections and 64.1% of them were young pedestrians. Pedestrians using mobile phones while crossing unsignalized intersections were at higher risk of accident, crossed more slowly, and were less likely to look at traffic status than those not using a mobile phone. Moreover, the probability of conflicts when watching the screen, talking, and listening to music are 2.704, 1.793, and 1.114 times greater, respectively, than those who do not use a mobile phone.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-216
Author(s):  
Khaled Shaaban

Background: Pedestrian non-compliance at signalized crossings is unsafe and considered one of the causes of pedestrian crashes. The speed limit on most major urban roads is 60 km/hr or less. However, the speed on some urban roads is higher in some countries. In this case, the situation is more unsafe and increases the possibility of fatal injuries or fatalities in the case of a crash. Therefore, it is expected that the pedestrians will be more cautious on these roads. Aim: This study aims to explore pedestrian compliance at signalized intersections on major arterials with 80 km/hr speeds in Qatar. Methods: Video data were collected for pedestrian movements at multiple intersections. Results: The study reported a 68.1 percent compliance rate at the study locations. The results also revealed that 14.6 percent of the pedestrians crossed during the Flashing Don’t Walk interval and 17.3 percent crossed during the Steady Don’t Walk interval. These rates are considered high compared to other countries. Several variables that may influence pedestrians’ behavior were investigated. Binary and ordinal logistic regression models were developed to describe the pedestrian crossing behavior as a function of these variables. Conclusion: Male and middle-age pedestrians were more likely to cross during these two intervals. The analysis showed that female pedestrians, elder pedestrians, pedestrians crossing in groups, pedestrians waiting before crossing, and pedestrians crossing against a flow of other pedestrians are more likely to comply and cross during the Walk interval compared to other groups. Several solutions were proposed in the study to increase compliance rates.


JMIR Cardio ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad Eric Darling ◽  
Silviu Dovancescu ◽  
Jane S Saczynski ◽  
Jarno Riistama ◽  
Fatima Sert Kuniyoshi ◽  
...  

10.2196/10194 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. e10194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niclas Palmius ◽  
Kate E A Saunders ◽  
Oliver Carr ◽  
John R Geddes ◽  
Guy M Goodwin ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 164-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoriyoshi Hashimoto ◽  
Yanlei Gu ◽  
Li-Ta Hsu ◽  
Miho Iryo-Asano ◽  
Shunsuke Kamijo

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Martín Poó ◽  
Ruben Daniel Ledesma ◽  
Roberto Trujillo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document