scholarly journals Pharmacists’ perceptions of the Canadian opioid regulatory exemptions on patient care and opioid stewardship

Author(s):  
Lisa D. Bishop ◽  
Zahava R. S. Rosenberg-Yunger ◽  
Shelita Dattani

Background: This study explored the perceptions of Canadian pharmacists about the barriers and facilitators of providing opioid stewardship activities in pharmacy practice, considering the subsection 56(1) class exemption under Health Canada’s Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA). Methods: Qualitative key informant telephone interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of pharmacists from across Canada. We included community or primary health care team-based pharmacists who self-identified as having experience with providing care for patients using opioids via the exemptions. All transcripts were de-identified, and thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes. Ethics approval was obtained. Results: Twenty pharmacists from community and primary health care teams, from all provinces and from urban and rural practices were interviewed. The following themes emerged: 1) optimization of opioid-related patient care, 2) jurisdictional impact and 3) awareness and education. Barriers and facilitators for opioid stewardship activities were identified. Discussion: The exemptions facilitated the pharmacists’ ability to provide opioid stewardship and positively affect patient care by providing continuity of and timely access to care. Our research demonstrated that pharmacists can responsibly and independently manage opioid prescriptions within this expanded scope, demonstrating the valuable contribution pharmacists can have in opioid stewardship. Conclusion: Pharmacists were willing and able to care for patients receiving opioid medication and thereby played a role in helping address the opioid crisis. The benefits of these exemptions were demonstrated beyond situations related to the COVID-19 pandemic and warrant consideration for consistent implementation across provincial and territorial jurisdictions, thereby ensuring equitable access to care for all Canadians.

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza Yurie Teruya Uchimura ◽  
Andréa Tenório Correia da Silva ◽  
Ana Luiza d’Ávila Viana

1995 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cora Shiroyama ◽  
Lorna McKee ◽  
Linda McKie

The evaluation of health promotion in primary health care has been brought to the forefront of debates in Scotland with the introduction of an evaluation component in every project funded under the Development of Health Care Fund scheme. The level of skills and empathy with evaluation approaches and research methods varies considerably between primary health care team members, and consequently academic researchers are increasingly being drawn into NHS debates on evaluation and health promotion in primary health care. In this article the authors draw upon their respective experiences as evaluators to highlight specific issues and concerns in the evaluation of health promotion in a primary health care setting.


2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 437-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Peters ◽  
Manish Kohli ◽  
Maya Mascarenhas ◽  
Krishna Rao

1988 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 481-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Grant ◽  
Anne Richardson

Although there has been considerable interest into the amount of liaison work that general psychiatrists do with general practitioners in primary health care settings, and into the role that social workers can play in liaising with the primary health care team, less is known about the extent to which general psychiatrists have established liaison links with particular social services offices, what form the liaison takes and whether the liaison has worked satisfactorily.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document