Paired associate learning deficits in poor readers: The contribution of phonological input and output processes

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 616-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin A Litt ◽  
Hua-Chen Wang ◽  
Jessica Sailah ◽  
Nicholas A Badcock ◽  
Anne Castles

It is well-established that poor readers exhibit deficits in paired associate learning (PAL), and there is increasing evidence for a phonological locus of these deficits. However, it remains unclear whether poor performance stems from difficulties specific to the phonological output system or difficulties that affect both phonological input and output processes. Understanding these deficits is important not only in the context of PAL but also for informing broader theories of typical and atypical reading development. We developed a novel paradigm that allowed us to assess PAL in the presence and absence of phonological output demands. In total, 14 poor readers and 14 age-matched controls were first trained to criterion in verbal-visual PAL before being tested in the visual-verbal direction. The results showed that poor readers learned at the same rate as controls in verbal-visual PAL, even when the nonword stimuli were phonologically confusable. Yet, despite having reached the same criterion as controls in verbal-visual PAL, poor readers exhibited robust impairments for those same paired associates in visual-verbal PAL. The overall pattern of results is most consistent with the conclusion that PAL deficits reflect impairments to the phonological output system; however, results that may challenge this interpretation are also discussed.

1966 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 879-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chizuko Izawa

To obtain evidence as to whether either learning or forgetting occurs on unreinforced trials and to adduce principles of optimal programming of reinforced (R) and test (T) trials, two experiments were planned each having four conditions with different repetitive R-T sequences: RTRT …, RRTRRT …, RTTRTT …, and RRTTRRTT. … 50 college students in each experiment learned 5 paired associates under each condition. Performance on successive Ts without intervening reinforcement suggested that neither learning nor forgetting occurred on Ts per se. However, the occurrence of Ts increased the effectiveness of subsequent Rs. A stimulus fluctuation model accounted for the major acquisition and retention phenomena, including the differential rates of learning under the different R-T sequences.


1971 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 803-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar A. Chenoweth ◽  
Gerry L. Wilcove

A perceptual paired-associates task was presented in which pictures of objects and consonant-vowel-consonant trigrams served as stimulus and response members of the P-A unit, respectively. Introductory psychology students had been classified previously into encoding groups on the basis of their performance on a memory task. The prediction that the linguistic encoders would learn the PA task more slowly than the perceptual encoders was supported by the results.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_24) ◽  
pp. P1300-P1301
Author(s):  
Jenalle E. Baker ◽  
Yen Lim ◽  
Judith Jaeger ◽  
David Ames ◽  
Robert H. Pietrzak ◽  
...  

1965 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Mueller ◽  
Robert M. W. Travers

Each of 34 Ss was presented with a list of 12 paired associates which were arranged according to high-low or low-high stimulus and response meaningfulness and also in a simultaneous or sequential time relationship. Meaningfulness level on the stimulus side of the dyad rather than on the response side was found to be more crucial for learning, and significantly more learning occurred also when the dyads were presented in the simultaneous condition. The findings were discussed in terms of both association theory and the differences between the present procedure and the conventional anticipation method.


1972 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-414
Author(s):  
Wilton L. Gibson ◽  
Lewis R. Lieberman

An unrecognized implication of Rock's (1957) analysis of paired-associate learning is that a most efficient way of learning a list is to begin with a single pair and add a pair each trial until the whole list is learned. A list of 17 difficult, single-lettered, 2-digit number pairs was used. 18 control Ss received all pairs for 9 trials, while 18 experimental Ss used the add-a-pair method. By the last trial and 153 exposures each, experimental Ss knew 9.72 pairs compared to 6.78 for controls, a significant advantage.


1968 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 671-674
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Cohen ◽  
Andreas Murray

Pools of paired associates (double or single letters paired with one- or two-digit numbers) were constructed so that all pairs within a pool had approximately the same mediation value (MV), this latter value being defined as the ease with which a mediator can be found within a pair. These pools were then used in a drop-out experiment where a list of 8 pairs were learned to a criterion of one correct repetition. The main result was that rate of presentation, mean MV of the pool and drop-out/constant procedure were significant. That the variable drop-out/constant procedure proved significant is contrary to the results obtained by Rock, and this is discussed in relation to the question of one-trial versus incremental learning.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 964-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenalle E. Baker ◽  
Robert H. Pietrzak ◽  
Simon M. Laws ◽  
David Ames ◽  
Victor L. Villemagne ◽  
...  

1972 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 263-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Steger ◽  
Frank R. Vellutino ◽  
Uriel Meshoulam

The hypothesis that poor readers suffer from an inter-sensory perceptual deficit was tested by having 16 poor and 16 normal readers learn an inter- and intra-sensory paired-associate task. Thus, visual symbols were paired with tactile stimuli and another set of tactile stimuli were paired with tactile stimuli. Although all poor readers met an explicit criterion for poor reading, there was no difference between poor and normal readers in either of the paired-associate tasks. The results suggest that a general perceptual deficit does not exist for poor readers; however, a specific integration problem in auditory-visual pairing may exist.


1973 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 923-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giyoo Hatano ◽  
Keiko Kuhara

Undergraduate students learned paired-associates, with names of shops as stimulus-terms and sets of 4 digits (“telephone numbers”) as response-terms. In Exp. I, Ss, by assigning one of several alternative pronunciations, or “readings,” to each digit, as permitted in modern Japanese, were quickly able to produce mnemonic words or phrases for about half the 20 pairs, and these devices greatly facilitated Ss' recall and recognition of the numbers. In Exp. II, experimental Ss given these mnemonic phrases performed significantly better in recall and recognition of the numbers than control Ss. The nature of verbal ‘coding’ is discussed in detail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document