To Admit or Not to Admit on the Morning of Surgery: Patients' Perspectives on Day of Surgery Admission

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 56-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
RL Harries ◽  
CA Bradshaw ◽  
EA Jones ◽  
P Lewis
1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kerridge ◽  
A. Lee ◽  
E. Latchford ◽  
S. J. Beehan ◽  
K. M. Hillman

A Perioperative Service has recently been introduced at Liverpool Hospital, a 460-bed university teaching hospital. This provides a co-ordinated system for managing all elective surgical patients from the time an admission is booked until hospital discharge. This paper describes the patient assessment, structure and staff requirements, benefits of and problems encountered with this service. The patient's preoperative preparation occurs before hospital admission. Where possible, patients are admitted on the day of procedure, either as a day-only patient, or a day-of-surgery patient. Patients are initially admitted to a specifically designed Perioperative Unit, adjacent to the Operating Theatre Suite. Patients do not enter the surgical wards until after their operation. Planning of the hospital discharge process commences at the time of booking for operation. Introduction of the Perioperative Service was staged process commencing in mid-1992. The hospital admits approximately 6,400 elective surgery cases each year. From July 1992 to December 1994, day-only patients were approximately 45% of these cases. Day-of-surgery admission patients increased from 6% to 35% of all cases over the same period. Appproximately 22% of elective surgical cases were seen in the Perioperative Clinic. As the Perioerative Service became fully operational, the average length of stay for elective surgical procedures fell. There has been a reduction in the areas of cancellations due to unavailablity of beds, inappropriate preparation of patients, and non-attendance of patients for booked procedures. Patient acceptance is high. The existence of a perioperative system facilitates the planning and management of elective surgery with maximum quality and efficiency.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Brown ◽  
Petra Grehan ◽  
Marie Brennan ◽  
Denise Carter ◽  
Aoife Brady ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The aim of this study is to improve rates of day of surgery admission (DOSA) for all suitable elective thoracic surgery patients. Design Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methods were used to enable improvements to both the operational process and the organizational working of the department over a period of 19 months. Setting A national thoracic surgery department in a large teaching hospital in Ireland. Participants Thoracic surgery staff, patients and quality improvement staff at the hospital. Intervention(s) LSS methods were employed to identify and remove the non-value-add in the patient’s journey and achieve higher levels of DOSA. A pre-surgery checklist and Thoracic Planning Meeting were introduced to support a multidisciplinary approach to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), reduce rework, improve list efficiency and optimize bed management. Main Outcome Measure(s) To achieve DOSA for all suitable elective thoracic surgery patients in line with the National Key Performance Indicator of 75%. A secondary outcome would be to further decrease overall length of stay by 1 day. Results Over a 19 month period, DOSA has increased from 10 to 75%. Duplication of preoperative tests reduced from 83 to <2%. Staff and patient surveys show increased satisfaction and improved understanding of ERAS. Conclusions Using LSS methods to improve both operational process efficiency and organizational clinical processes led to the successful achievement of increasing rates of DOSA in line with national targets.


2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neville Board ◽  
Gideon Caplan

A recent study at the Prince of Wales Hospital (PoW) compared health outcomes and user satisfactionfor conventional clinical pathways with a shortened pathway incorporating day of surgery admission(DOSA), early discharge and post acute care domiciliary visits for two high volume, elective surgicalprocedures (herniorrhaphy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy). This paper quantifies cost differencesbetween the control and intervention groups for nursing salaries and wages, other ward costs, pathologyand imaging.The study verified and measured the lower resource use that accompanies a significant reduction inlength of stay (LOS). Costs of pre- and post-operative domiciliary visits were calculated and offsetagainst savings generated by the re-engineered clinical pathway. Average costs per separation were atleast $239 (herniorrhaphy) and $265 (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) lower for those on the DOSApathway with domiciliary post acute care.


2012 ◽  
Vol 182 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Concannon ◽  
A. M. Hogan ◽  
L. Flood ◽  
W. Khan ◽  
R. Waldron ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 188 (3) ◽  
pp. 765-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Stephens ◽  
Claudine Murphy ◽  
Ian S. Reynolds ◽  
Shaheel Sahebally ◽  
Joseph Deasy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. AB093-AB093
Author(s):  
Ian Stephens ◽  
Claudine Murphy ◽  
Fiona McNally ◽  
Shaheel M. Sahebally ◽  
Ian S. Reynolds ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 291-299
Author(s):  
Jane O’Sullivan ◽  
Jack Collins ◽  
David Cooper ◽  
Ana Magdalina ◽  
Frances Meehan ◽  
...  

Background The current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, in accordance with the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines, recommend the following haematological investigations for all patients undergoing major elective surgery: full blood count, renal profile and coagulation screen if clinically indicated. However, the guidelines fail to specify a time-interval for which normal blood results remain valid. Currently all patients in Ireland undergoing substantial elective surgery requiring general or regional anaesthetic have a preoperative assessment prior to the surgery. Patients have phlebotomy performed as part of this assessment. Patients admitted for elective surgery often have these bloods repeated on the morning of surgery. Objectives To determine if blood investigations taken over a one-year period prior to surgery can be used as a baseline for clinically stable patients undergoing elective surgery. Study design and methods All consecutive day of surgery admission patients >18 years of age undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in Tallaght Hospital between 1 December 2014 and 1 December 2015 were identified using hospital records. Their blood results in the one-year period prior to surgery were compared to the blood results on the morning of surgery, using a McNemar’s test. A further clinical analysis was performed. Results There was no statistically significant change between blood results from three months prior to the surgery and the morning of surgery (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the blood results remained largely unchanged in the one year prior to surgery. No patient had the operation deferred due to aberrant blood results, following previously normal results prior to surgery. The potential cost-saving of omitting bloods is enormous. Conclusions There appears to be neither a statistical nor clinical benefit to repeating blood tests on the morning of surgery, following normal bloods <3 months in a clinically stable individual.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document