Bioreconstructive Poly-L/D-Lactide Implant Compared With Swanson Prosthesis in Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 746-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.B. Honkanen ◽  
R. Thonen ◽  
E.T. Skyttä ◽  
M. Ikävalko ◽  
M.U.K. Lehto ◽  
...  

It was hypothesized that the bioresorbable interposition implant might offer a viable alternative to conventional silicone implant arthroplasty in rheumatoid metacarpophalangeal joint destruction. A randomized clinical study was performed to compare a stemless poly-L/D-lactide copolymer 96: 4 (PLDLA) implant with the Swanson silicone implant. Results in 52 patients (53 hands and 175 joints) at a mean follow-up of 2 years (minimum 1 year) showed that the improvement in clinical assessments was comparable in both groups, except for better maintenance of palmar alignment in the Swanson group. The lack of implant fractures and intramedullary osteolysis were advantages of the PLDLA implant. The bioresorbable PLDLA interposition implant may offer an alternative tool for tailored reconstruction of rheumatoid metacarpophalangeal joints.

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 561-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. SCHMIDT ◽  
R. WILLBURGER ◽  
A. OSSOWSKI ◽  
R. K. MIEHLKE

After silicone arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint there is increasing osteolysis, subsidence and fracture of the implants in the longer postoperative term. In 44 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (54 hands) 151 arthroplasties of the metacarpophalangeal joint were assessed at a mean of 3.9 years postoperatively. In 57 arthroplasties titanium protectors (grommets) were used. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes with respect to swelling, correction of ulnar deviation, range of active movement and grip strength. The additional use of grommets in MP joint arthroplasty slightly reduced reactive osteolysis, protected the spacers from breakage and slightly reduced the amount of pain with only a few additional complications in the midterm follow-up.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-278
Author(s):  
V. S. Smirnov ◽  
S. A. Saveliev ◽  
S. V. Petlenko ◽  
G. Redlich ◽  
M. K. Erofeeva ◽  
...  

Aim:To compare the safety and prophylactic efficacy of Cytovir-3 and Arbidol in an open-label randomized clinical trial in children at seasonal risk of infectious respiratory disease.Methods:This study was performed in the period preceding a seasonal outbreak of acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI) and influenza. The study enrolled apparently healthy children aged 6 to 18 years without contra-indications to either Cytovir-3 or Arbidol. Cytovir-3 was given as 1 capsule per day, each day in a fasted state for 12 days. Arbidol was taken as a 100 mg capsule twice a week for three weeks. Following dosing, subjects were followed-up for a further three weeks. Overall health and presence of symptoms of either ARVI or influenza were monitored daily in all subjects. The level of sIgA in saliva was baselined before treatment and measured at the end of the follow-up period.Results:Most subjects did not exhibit any change in overall health status during the dosing and follow-up periods. The first two cases of illness in subjects receiving Cytovir-3 were diagnosed at the end of the third week after completion of dosing. In those subjects receiving Arbidol the first cases of illness were reported at the end of the second week following the end of prophylactic dosing. All patients displayed a significant increase in sIgA level at the end of the dosing period, but this was more pronounced in the Cytovir-3 group. Conclusion:The results of this comparative randomized clinical trial confirmed the safety and tolerability of both medications, and that the prophylactic efficacy of Cytovir-3 is equal to that of Arbidol.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e0156471
Author(s):  
Anete Trajman ◽  
Betina Durovni ◽  
Valeria Saraceni ◽  
Alexandre Menezes ◽  
Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document