The impact of transverse components on resistance and ultimate strength of 6-strand tendon repairs

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110183
Author(s):  
Ya Fang Wu ◽  
Jin Bo Tang

We assessed the effects of tendon core sutures' transverse components on the tensile resistance of two commonly used 6-strand tendon repairs. Tang and Yoshizu #1 repairs (6-strand) were tested and compared with 4-strand rectangular and double Kessler sutures (4-strand). A total of 40 pig flexor tendons were tested under cyclic loading. We recorded the number of tendons that formed a 2-mm gap between two tendon ends during 20 cycles of cyclic loading test, stiffness at the 1st and 20th loading cycle, and gap distance at the repair site and the ultimate repair strength at the 20th cycles. We found that the Yoshizu #1 repairs were more prone to form gaps and their ultimate strength was significantly lower than that of the Tang repair. The transverse components in a 6-strand repair affect gap formation and failure strength.

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110183
Author(s):  
Ya Fang Wu ◽  
Wei Feng Mao ◽  
Jin Bo Tang

We investigated the effects of the transverse components of a tendon core suture on tensile resistance and strength of 4-strand repairs. Forty-four pig flexor tendons were repaired with one of the following four methods: double Tsuge, U-shaped, 4-strand cross and 4-strand rectangular repairs. We recorded the number of the repaired tendons that formed a 2 mm gap between the tendon ends during cyclic loading for 20 cycles, stiffness of the tendon at the 1st and 20th cycle, gap distance at the repair site and ultimate strength of the repair at the 20th cycle. When transverse components were added to the core suture, a greater number of tendons formed a 2 mm gap during cyclic loading. The stiffness gradually decreased, and the repair site's gap distance after cyclic loading increased with the presence of transverse components of the sutures. We conclude that the core suture's transverse components negatively impact the tensile resistance of 4-strand tendon repairs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 345 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yidong Xia ◽  
Zhengshou Lai ◽  
Tyler Westover ◽  
Jordan Klinger ◽  
Hai Huang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 840-847
Author(s):  
Shaobo Nie ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Hui Ji ◽  
Zhirui Li ◽  
Wenwen Li ◽  
...  

Aims Restoration of proximal medial femoral support is the keystone in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. None of the available implants are effective in constructing the medial femoral support. Medial sustainable nail (MSN-II) is a novel cephalomedullary nail designed for this. In this study, biomechanical difference between MSN-II and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-II) was compared to determine whether or not MSN-II can effectively reconstruct the medial femoral support. Methods A total of 36 synthetic femur models with simulated intertrochanteric fractures without medial support (AO/OTA 31-A2.3) were assigned to two groups with 18 specimens each for stabilization with MSN-II or PFNA-II. Each group was further divided into three subgroups of six specimens according to different experimental conditions respectively as follows: axial loading test; static torsional test; and cyclic loading test. Results The mean axial stiffness, vertical displacement, and maximum failure load of MSN-II were 258.47 N/mm (SD 42.27), 2.99 mm (SD 0.56), and 4,886 N (SD 525.31), respectively, while those of PFNA-II were 170.28 N/mm (SD 64.63), 4.86 mm (SD 1.66), and 3,870.87 N (SD 552.21), respectively. The mean torsional stiffness and failure torque of MSN-II were 1.72 N m/° (SD 0.61) and 16.54 N m (SD 7.06), respectively, while those of PFNA-II were 0.61 N m/° (SD 0.39) and 6.6 N m (SD 6.65), respectively. The displacement of MSN-II in each cycle point was less than that of PFNA-II in cyclic loading test. Significantly higher stiffness and less displacement were detected in the MSN-II group (p < 0.05). Conclusion The biomechanical performance of MSN-II was better than that of PFNA-II, suggesting that MSN-II may provide more effective mechanical support in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(12):840–847.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document