scholarly journals Review of Electronic Decision-Support Tools for Diabetes Care: A Viable Option for Low- and Middle-Income Countries?

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed K. Ali ◽  
Seema Shah ◽  
Nikhil Tandon
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Abrahams ◽  
Lucy Gilson ◽  
Naomi S. Levitt ◽  
Joel A. Dave

Abstract Background The burden of non-communicable diseases is growing rapidly in low- and middle-income countries. Research suggests that health interventions that aim to improve patient self-management and empower patients to care actively for their disease will improve health outcomes over the long-term. There is, however, a gap in the literature about the potential role of the inpatient setting in supporting chronic care. This is particularly important in low-and-middle income countries where hospitals may be a rare prolonged point of contact between patient and health provider. The aim of this small scale, exploratory study was to understand what factors within the inpatient setting may affect patients’ feelings of empowerment in relation to their chronic disease care and provides recommendations for future inpatient-based interventions to support self-management of disease. Methods This study was based in a public, academic hospital in South Africa. Eighteen qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with multiple participants with experience of diabetes care: inpatients and health professionals such as nurses, endocrinologists, and dieticians. Findings were analysed using a broad, exploratory, thematic approach, guided by self-management and chronic care literature. Results Interviews with both patients and providers suggest that patients living in low socio-economic contexts are likely to struggle to access appropriate healthcare information and services, and may often have financial and emotional priorities that take precedence over their chronic illness. Younger people may also be more dependent on their family and community, giving them less ability to take control of their disease care and lifestyle. In addition, hospital care remains bound by an acute care model; and the inpatient setting of focus is characterised by perceived staff shortages and ineffective communication that undermine the implementation of patient empowerment-focused interventions. Conclusions Patient and provider contexts are likely to make supporting patient engagement in long-term chronic care difficult in lower income settings. However, knowledge of these factors can be harnessed to improve chronic care interventions in South Africa and other similar countries.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josefien Van Olmen ◽  
Ku Grace Marie ◽  
Darras Christian ◽  
Kalobu Jean Clovis ◽  
Bewa Emery ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Rios-Zertuche ◽  
Alvaro Gonzalez-Marmol ◽  
Francisco Millán-Velasco ◽  
Karla Schwarzbauer ◽  
Ignez Tristao

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 548-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Dikomitis ◽  
Trish Green ◽  
Una Macleod

AimThe purpose of this evaluation was to obtain views from general practitioners (GPs) who piloted the electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for suspected lung or colorectal cancer. We wanted to find out whether GPs were able to integrate these tools into their everyday practice. We were also keen to identify facilitators and barriers to their more widespread use.BackgroundCancer remains one of UK’s biggest health problems, in terms of morbidity and mortality. Comparative European data show that five-year survival figures for many cancers are lower in the United Kingdom than in comparable European countries. eRATs are intended to aid recognition of symptoms of lung and colorectal cancers in patients aged 40 years and over.MethodsThis was a qualitative study; telephone interviews were conducted with 23 GPs who piloted the eRATs. A systematic qualitative analysis was applied to the data. The normalisation process model was used after data collection. This theory-driven conceptual framework was used to examine the operationalisation of this intervention in Primary Care.FindingsElectronic decision-support tools appear to be useful additions to the resources available to GPs in order to assist them with recognizing potential cancer symptoms. However, the tools need to be refined in order to integrate them into GP practice. The tools raised GPs’ awareness about cancer because of the prompt facility of the software, although this also raised the potential of ‘prompt fatigue’. GPs constantly receive alerts via their clinical system, particularly related to the Quality and Outcomes Framework. The integration of eRATs into routine practice could be engendered by improvement to the training packages that accompany them, and by its delivery via a platform compatible with all GP clinical systems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masih A. Babagoli ◽  
Ramfis Nieto-Martínez ◽  
Juan P. González-Rivas ◽  
Kavita Sivaramakrishnan ◽  
Jeffrey I Mechanick

Diabetes prevalence is increasing worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), posing the need for improved detection and management strategies. Chronic disease models and lifestyle medicine provide structures for action. Community health workers (CHWs) can significantly contribute to chronic disease care if they are trained and integrated into low-resource health systems. Although most current CHWs worldwide are performing maternal/child health and infectious disease-related tasks, other programs involving CHWs for noncommunicable disease prevention and management are increasing. In this article, we discuss the advantages, challenges, and questions regarding possible roles assigned to CHWs in the prevention and management of diabetes. These roles include performing simple screening tests, implementing lifestyle/behavioral interventions, and connecting patients with alternatives to biomedicine. Specifically, CHWs can aid diabetes epidemiological surveillance by conducting risk score-based screening or capillary glucose testing, and they can facilitate diabetes self-management by delivering interventions described in the transcultural diabetes nutrition algorithm. Furthermore, while this role has not formally been assigned, CHWs can leverage their intimate knowledge of local practices to provide decision-making support to patients in environments with pluralistic health systems. Ethnocultural differences in CHW functions and transcultural adaptations of their roles in diabetes care should also be considered. In summary, CHWs can improve diabetes care by screening high-risk individuals and implementing lifestyle interventions, especially in LMIC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-219B
Author(s):  
Jorge César Correia ◽  
Hafsa Meraj ◽  
Soo Huat Teoh ◽  
Ahmed Waqas ◽  
Maaz Ahmad ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document